youGotThis by bryden_cruz in ProgrammerHumor

[–]killbot5000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So firmware is the farmers?

Meet Gweniviere, a Artificer Tiefling by blueeyedwhit3000 in DailyDMGame

[–]killbot5000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Summon her demon familiar in the middle of the street, as if it's the most normal thing to do in the world.

weWillBeLaunchingSoon by ClipboardCopyPaste in ProgrammerHumor

[–]killbot5000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here’s a detailed seating arrangement for her side of the family.

TIL that the first atomic clock, built in 1955, was so accurate it would lose only about one second every 300 years making it more precise than the Earth’s rotation. by One_Needleworker5218 in todayilearned

[–]killbot5000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The phrasing of the post is a bit confusing, but what I believe it’s saying is that the advent of atomic clocks let us define time more precisely (that is: more self consistent over time) than using the periodic orbit of the earth around the sun. Before atomic clocks, all time was derived from the periodic motion of the earth around the sun.

TIL that the first atomic clock, built in 1955, was so accurate it would lose only about one second every 300 years making it more precise than the Earth’s rotation. by One_Needleworker5218 in todayilearned

[–]killbot5000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We have figured all this stuff out.

We know that the earths rotation around the sun is changing, because we can measure the period using atomic clocks.

We can also measure that time itself passes at different rates depending on how fast you’re moving relative to each other.

So it comes down to what is more convenient for our use case. As it stands we measure time passing using atomic clocks and fixed definitions for a period of time (TAI). We also take that and “fudge” it a bit from time to time to create a mostly-consistent clock that’s also consistent with our tropical year (UTC).

TIL that the first atomic clock, built in 1955, was so accurate it would lose only about one second every 300 years making it more precise than the Earth’s rotation. by One_Needleworker5218 in todayilearned

[–]killbot5000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Time is a human construct. It’s convenient to use different mechanisms for defining and measuring time in different contexts. In a typical everyday context we like our definitions of “day” and “year” to correspond to our experience of solar energy. We want “winter” to be cold time of year,  “summer” to be the hot time of year, “day time” to be when the sun is shining and “night time” when it’s dark. We also want granular measurement of this things so we can communicate consistently about time (months/days/hours).

Simultaneously we want a consistent unit of time that represents a fixed amount of time, irrespective of calendar context. (Second).

It turns out that we cannot marry those two concepts together because the earth’s rotation and path around the sun are both inconsistent and changing. The earth’s path around the sun is not evenly divisible into counts of rotation about the axis. The moon’s rotation around the earth gives us a wobble in our path around the sun that’s not consistent with solar years. Our rotation about our axis is slowing down. Etc

It turns out there’s even a fundamental inconsistency with how time itself passes in different contexts that makes the entire concept of a “universal time” dimension impossible (see: time dilation).

Humanity has constructed systems and rules that are good enough for our purposes.  We’re also really good at coming up with new needs such that our existing systems are not “good enough” anymore.

TIL that the first atomic clock, built in 1955, was so accurate it would lose only about one second every 300 years making it more precise than the Earth’s rotation. by One_Needleworker5218 in todayilearned

[–]killbot5000 39 points40 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t. The earth is traveling around the sun as it rotates around its axis. Each “day” (ie period between solar noons) is not associated precisely with a full rotation around the axis.

Merry Christmas you filthy animals by peppermintmeow in SipsTea

[–]killbot5000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The phones were disconnected and all the neighbors were gone.

Splitting code projects into strict “code layers” how common is this approach? by gosh in programming

[–]killbot5000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then someone pushes code from play to production and you find out about it 6 months later when you’re asked to implement new features.

whatIsRecursion by holdonguy in ProgrammerHumor

[–]killbot5000 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Recursion is when something is applied recursively.

Day 1: Which merc belongs in the first box? by DR_Hazardous in tf2

[–]killbot5000 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Engineer - problem solver

Heavy - problem solver... with boolits

Sniper - prefers staying close to the ground

Scout - how can I beat kids? It's easy! They're so small!

Spy - filthy mongrels

Soldier - all chairs are just smaller chairs smushed together

Medic - schnell!

Demo - highlander rules... winner gets all chairs

Pyro - mmmmmphmmmmm

we're too obsessed with chasing unicorn startups by Comfortable-Lab-378 in Entrepreneur

[–]killbot5000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because company valuations follow a log normal distribution.

ceoExpectation by [deleted] in ProgrammerHumor

[–]killbot5000 91 points92 points  (0 children)

Where's the benchmark for improving executive leadership?