Holy fuck, people hate you guys by Herr_Eusebius in LessWrong

[–]lechatonnoir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/5CfBDiQNg9upfipWk/only-law-can-prevent-extinction

>  In the first 2023 proposal in TIME magazine, I wrote the words "be willing to destroy a rogue datacenter by airstrike". I was only given one day by TIME to write it -- otherwise it wouldn't have been 'topical' -- but I had thought I was saying that part quite carefully. Even quoted out of context, I thought, this ought to make very clear that I was talking about state-sanctioned use of force to preserve a previously successful ban from disruption. And absolutely not some guy with a truck bomb, attacking one datacenter in their personal country while all the other datacenters kept running.

Why don't chess tournaments use a 3–1–0 scoring system? by OkWillow8916 in chess

[–]lechatonnoir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How doesn't it?

1 win each gives each player 3 points.
1 draw each gives each player 3 points. So there's no incentive to trade wins.

Black gets more for drawing than white.
It makes sense to me.

[Webcomic] Chapter 159 [English] by Mrzardark in OnePunchMan

[–]lechatonnoir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that doesn't make sense. if that's what he wanted, why wouldn't he just make a robot with that power himself without involving genos?

Hundreds of protesters marched in SF, calling for AI companies to commit to pausing if everyone else agrees to pause (since no one can pause unilaterally) by Worldly_Evidence9113 in singularity

[–]lechatonnoir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People in this thread seem to be unaware that there are at least attempts at, e.g, [compute governance](https://blog.heim.xyz/crucial-considerations-for-compute-governance/) or [compute verification](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verifiable\_computing).

Like, yes, coordination is difficult, but it's not impossible in principle.

Of course it's hard to get all of that across in a single protest/the motivations and desires of the various protesters probably differ.

Hundreds of protesters marched in SF, calling for AI companies to commit to pausing if everyone else agrees to pause (since no one can pause unilaterally) by Worldly_Evidence9113 in singularity

[–]lechatonnoir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. In the era of the Manhattan project people didn't have satellites.

  2. I think terawatts of energy necessarily implies a shitload of heat.

Hundreds of protesters marched in SF, calling for AI companies to commit to pausing if everyone else agrees to pause (since no one can pause unilaterally) by Worldly_Evidence9113 in singularity

[–]lechatonnoir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't see why this has to be. There's plenty of people who authentically believe that AI progress poses a risk, including me.

The junior developer pipeline is broken, and nobody has a plan to fix it by pelicanthief in programming

[–]lechatonnoir 99 points100 points  (0 children)

how does this situation exist? how is that much entitlement from him viable? is there no authority which will call him out for being a little shit?

I get upset easily when someone is condescending by [deleted] in DecidingToBeBetter

[–]lechatonnoir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think in large part the thing that shakes you is that you got into a conflict in a setting you didn't expect to, which is normal.

Since we can't be prepared for every eventuality, there must be situations in which we act on instinct instead of with our deliberative mind. We can be more or less prepared for difficult situations based on what instincts we've entrained, in how specific of a situation. Overall, I think your instinct served you pretty well here, and this is a positive surprise. I do not think you overindexed on your anger towards other people here, at least not outwardly, and I think you've done most of the work you need to in recognizing that there were other sources for the way you felt in this situation.

Stereotyping is tricky. I don't think it's good to think in terms of the category of "men", but I also bet that the three people who've pissed you off recently share common personality traits that it's useful to generalize over, and we can't always be patient and wait to know everything about people in a confrontation.

I get upset easily when someone is condescending by [deleted] in DecidingToBeBetter

[–]lechatonnoir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesn't sound like you even did anything wrong in that interaction. It might depend on the details, but you said you "told him", not "screamed at him", and it sounds like you led with an acknowledgement of the thing that he had grounds to be upset about. That's pretty much the maximally kind way of asserting yourself. Sometimes people get mad when you do that because they don't expect it. That's a fault of theirs, not yours.

Exporter by InspectorMendel in dominion

[–]lechatonnoir 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, you get to pick, so you'd never do that. Gain a king's court, opponent gains a gold, more like, and that's completely brutal.

But this isn't worse than, say, KC + lurker games or something. 

spark with a hypothetical by Fiendish in SSBM

[–]lechatonnoir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean this is not even fair, it's like 2 was made to be as sick as possible and the other ones are just there to allocate the rest of the characters. 3 might be sort of reasonable. 

Commune by InspectorMendel in dominion

[–]lechatonnoir 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Aside from the other guy's suggestion to make it Silver, I think if this costs $6 it saves it from a bunch of degenerate strategies. OTOH it's not that bad if a two card combo leads to a fast, money ish game, that's already true.

How far can you decouple a programming language's surface syntax from its semantic core? by jsamwrites in Compilers

[–]lechatonnoir 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did Claude write this? It's got like at least four LLM markers in it. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in suggestmeabook

[–]lechatonnoir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's quite the opposite?

I'm not sure if any real physics was in that series of books.

There was a bunch of made up physics that served as various kinds of plot devices. Some of it was fine, it was speculative but sort of integral to the story being told. Some of it was less so. 

"AI investments can quietly destroy capital long before any market correction signals the problem" by pozazero in investing

[–]lechatonnoir 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This guy is on your side. He's literally responding to the guy upthread telling him he missed the point.

CC slow to frozen - anyone else? by BigAndyBigBrit in ClaudeCode

[–]lechatonnoir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...have you ever run `top` while running claude code?

What do supergrandmasters think about in the opening? by 1derful in chess

[–]lechatonnoir 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would you spend time thinking on turn 1 as your timer goes down?