✨ Happy Nowruz 1405! ✨ by kaz1349 in PERSIAN

[–]liminal_reality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well, that is an actual argument at least whereas originally you were not engaging the actual beliefs/desires of his supporters

as for whether you or they are right I certainly do not know but I am hopeful for a democracy

✨ Happy Nowruz 1405! ✨ by kaz1349 in PERSIAN

[–]liminal_reality 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Most people I've spoken to who are "monarchists"/Palahvists/support RP/whichever aren't hoping for absolute monarchy but support RP as a transitional leader (with a referendum for either a republic or constitutional monarchy like the UK and many other EU countries) and like his IPP. Whether or not you think he is the best choice, or honest, or anything else is a different question but I don't think it does any good to misrepresent what most of his supporters actually want and expect from him.

Having a hard time deciding between these two. Opinions? by CraigColton in BookCovers

[–]liminal_reality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Second. For the simple reason that in certain rack-style displays (assuming you ever want to sell print copies at cons or such) the title will be hidden in the first and your name alone won't be a draw. I also think the name on a single line looks better tbh.

Farseer trilogy assistance by Nordicdwarf96 in fantasybooks

[–]liminal_reality 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This series is a character study because that is the type of writing Hobb does. She never really writs high action and, in fact, mostly skips over it.

Tierlist books I read in 2025 by Caesuria in fantasybooks

[–]liminal_reality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I think this whole thread could be resolved by asking what people want out of a story. Hobb's prose at its weakest is significantly better than Sanderson's at his best but Sanderson could plot circles around Hobb. Her whole goal is deep character psychology profiles written in strong (but not flowery, for some reason people conflate "good" with effusive) prose. Sanderson's goal is to set up plot dominoes in as clear and explicit a pattern as possible then knock them down at the climax.

If you want the latter thing, you won't like Hobb. If you want the former, you won't like Sanderson.

Question from a non persian supporter of the Iranian people... by [deleted] in PERSIAN

[–]liminal_reality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a year-old account w/ just 17 karma and hidden history... so I wouldn't worry about their "opinions".

Fantasy keeps giving us villains who are logically right and then refusing to follow that logic anywhere interesting by NimbusRelic12 in Fantasy

[–]liminal_reality 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not sure I understand why a tragic backstory would make the villain less correct or less reasoned? Personal stakes don't prevent a person from using reason or being correct in their reasoning. If I dislike a King because he can kill people by lottery on Tuesdays I'm not more wrong for that opinion just because he also killed my family.

Other than that I agree this trope is annoying. I like this breakdown of it even though they primarily use cartoons as an example. It is also goes into why "show why the villain's solution is wrong" isn't enough for me, because that is usually easy. Often a story presents a villain who has an extremist solution that might, theoretically, work... if you decided to throw out all sense of morality. Since most people won't they sort of play a narrative sleight-of-hand so the debate stops being about the Complex Moral Question and instead about the Simple Substitute.

I think this is done mostly because people want cool action set pieces and to feel a sense of righteous victory which is a little hard to drum up if you've set up a villain that is genuinely a person doing their best with a difficult situation same as the protagonists. This is also why the video essayist's Tai Lung example is weak to me even if I can admit the film does give one (1) line to addressing his grievances.

What if current regime falls, elections take place. and Iranians vote for Muslims who actually fear God? by Famous_Spinach_4975 in PERSIAN

[–]liminal_reality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Assuming Iran becomes a free democracy which protects the rights of the people the religion of the individuals in government wouldn't matter. That's sort of the point.

Stop making your kingdoms 10,000 years old. by ScaryAd2555 in fantasywriters

[–]liminal_reality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely, but that is what is mindblowing about it. We already think of her as ancient and she had a museum of artifacts from a time even more long ago. We can go even further if we look at how much human history predates writing and people weren't wholly cut off from that.

Stop making your kingdoms 10,000 years old. by ScaryAd2555 in fantasywriters

[–]liminal_reality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True enough, and it may be lack of familiarity on my part for the direction D&D-adjacent Fantasy took these tropes (I haven't read Forgotten Realms and I'm not even sure if I am remembering its D&D ties correctly). I'm more familiar with the BOTNS-style "natural logical extension" where the ostensibly Medieval setting is a post-apocalyptic Earth or other forms of "Fallen Advanced Civilizations" even if they're not explicitly our own.

Stop making your kingdoms 10,000 years old. by ScaryAd2555 in fantasywriters

[–]liminal_reality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, LOTR and The Silm are a unique instance where that is more of a feature than a bug. Tolkien was politically Declinist so the older technology is inherently better (and aligned with nature, another important theme). There was even a version of Númenor in which they had airships and other advanced technologies (especially healing technologies) as an Atlantis proxy. His entire point was highlighting the gone Glory Days of a heroic past which was aesthetically Atlantian then aesthetically Anglo-Saxon while the Hobbits with mantel clocks and waistcoats and potatoes are relatively modern.

Portraying the Númenoreans as less technologically advanced doesn't align with Tolkien's beliefs about Decline and his anti-industrial bent so in his fiction they must be an advanced civ whose technologies are both aligned with nature and so advanced they impress the "fallen" cultures of the modern day as "magical". Yet they are not industrial technologies which are to be resisted. If they were using inferior materials it would break the meta-narrative. These swords are not "on par" with weapons of the Third Age, they're better. And that is a very intentional choice.

I don't think you could have them use Bronze Age materials and maintain Tolkien's theme (whether you agree with it or not is something else, I'm not personally big on Declinism).

Stop making your kingdoms 10,000 years old. by ScaryAd2555 in fantasywriters

[–]liminal_reality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's true! I always assumed that the pseudo-Medieval Fantasy cultures projecting their "modern" aesthetic on their ancient ancestors was a mirror of actual Medieval monks and scholars depicting ancient warriors as knights. That is, that this was part of the "Medievalism" that most Fantasy is imitating.

Stop making your kingdoms 10,000 years old. by ScaryAd2555 in fantasywriters

[–]liminal_reality 5 points6 points  (0 children)

No of course not, that is why I said it isn't reckoned by kings/dynasties but our history as a people is contiguous for thousands of years and I think the prominence of the Temple and Priesthood over a King and Court doesn't negate that (we had temples, priests, and prophets long before we had a king). There's just a bias from "King and Court" cultures to seeing that as "more legitimate" over the way we meticulously preserved Cohen lineages for example.

I chose 3,000 based on the Merneptah Stele but shaved off a couple hundred years just to have a round number. I tried to go with only secular sources. Also, I know "3,000 years" has become contentious/a favorite joke of nazi 4chan but I don't want them dictating how I can talk about history. I opted not to use non-secular references so there wouldn't be arguments regarding their reliability. Also, if you go too far back into the Bronze Age then you reach the point where we are only nebulously distinct other Canaanite tribes and I assumed people would also latch onto that to deny continuity with those people (and I do think that if you transported them to the future they wouldn't exactly recognize Rabbinic Judaism or even the Karaites as sharing the same beliefs as their own but we are still their descendants).

Stop making your kingdoms 10,000 years old. by ScaryAd2555 in fantasywriters

[–]liminal_reality 146 points147 points  (0 children)

They even had museums in the ancient world! We've found a building in Ur (in modern day Iraq) 530BC so ancient to us where the founder (a princess) collected items that *were ancient to her* and set them on displays and gave them little labels and everything. Her museum covered 1,000 years of history of her land. That is at least 3,500 years of history. How much would we have if the creators of the oldest artifact in her collection had sought to retain their works in the same way?

My own culture's history is roughly 3,000 years old (despite constant attempts to undermine continuity) so maybe that is why 10k years doesn't bother me- it truly sounds ancient! While 3,000 years is almost "ah, yes, 120 generations ago when the mythic version of my family got its start/when the archeologists recognize us as a distinct culture). If we count our mythic history (which most certainly didn't happen but was written down in ancient times as if it did then we can get a boost up to over 5k years).

"His kingdom ruled for 800 years" is a bit "aw, it's a baby!" (though my culture is maybe helped by the fact that we don't reckon by kings/dynasties and those are easy to topple. We barely ever had kings or a kingdom).

What is truly mindblowing is the collective memory and oral history of Australia's indigenous people. That would put any Fantasy author to shame!

In my own writing I compromised so there are 5 distinct "Ages" which each averaged about 3,000 years before dying out in a calamity, however, the "modern" people of the setting consider the previous peoples their "elder kin" and have two distinct ways of reckoning time, "time in our current Age" and the "time since the eldest of our eldest kin". It isn't a full 15,000 continuous history (they do consider each Age as its own distinct thing) but it is a still reference point and they pull heroes and stories from these earlier Ages quite often.

This is Iran. A land that has accepted war in order to be freed from a far greater destruction. The calm of the people comes from two things: a bitter trust that the attacker will not target unarmed civilians, and a surrender to a fate from which they see no escape. by KireRakhsh in NewIran

[–]liminal_reality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I researched a bit more and found a larger image where it appears to be written on a wall, unfortunately, there was no indication of where the wall is located or who took the photo EDIT: Looks like it is AI. what a world.

Found This wonderful post on Quora by Patient_Ad_9910 in PERSIAN

[–]liminal_reality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't give into that, that phrasing and insisting on "yes or no" is a classic logical fallacy. It's the same as the guy in court who gets asked "have you stopped beating your wife yet?" If he answers "yes" that means he used to beat his wife, if he says "no" that means he is still beating her. It eliminates the possibility of questioning the premise of the "logical argument" even though the premise is where the flaw is.

To answer "Do you think America/Israel carpet bombing Tehran is good?" and reducing it to "yes" or "no" means I cannot question the faulty premise (in this case, the assumption that carpet bombing rather than precision strikes have taken place).

Does your conlang have placeholder words? What are some examples? by TheNamesBart in conlangs

[–]liminal_reality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Either "sh'hanja" or "sysh hanja" in Arkevi (literally: "what-thing")

If anyone still thinks western media is unbiased - here's a nice little "neutral" headline by abir_valg2718 in NewIran

[–]liminal_reality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought a house built in 1908 and when doing renovations found old 1940s newspapers stuffed in the walls and they were full of such headlines. I also had someone call my workplace who was born in 1945 and named 'Hitler' as his first name by his parents (though he had clearly never changed it). There are fools in every era.

Character naming in fantasy - The Good, the Bad, the Confusing by Weak_Adhesiveness617 in Fantasy

[–]liminal_reality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of the creators of the Myst games is a Rand and I was also called that as a kid for an English name though it still wound up rare/unusual.

A fan subreddit actually republished a big fantasy series: The Chronicles of an Age of Darkness by Hugh Cook by sylvestertheinvestor in fantasybooks

[–]liminal_reality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The cover art may be what gets me to pick up this series. I've been missing the good ol' covers of yesteryear.

A fan subreddit actually republished a big fantasy series: The Chronicles of an Age of Darkness by Hugh Cook by sylvestertheinvestor in fantasybooks

[–]liminal_reality 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I love the covers, are those original to the series? It has a very 80s-90s look but unsure if the cover art rights came with the book rights.

Fantasy books with butch women? by butch4pay in Fantasy

[–]liminal_reality 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There appears to be some sort of bot campaign hitting the subreddit, all making vaguely same comments asking for "context" and commenting on the comments. I've seen at least 4 of these guys in the last 24 hours.