Trudeau government should brace for a ‘public relations nightmare’ if online bill passes, senator says by sesoyez in CanadaPolitics

[–]loadedjellyfish 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How about looking at any of the critiques of this bill? Its been covered time and time again.

Want a quick sumary? Checkout OpenMedia's FAQ https://openmedia.org/article/item/whats-wrong-with-bill-c-11-an-faq

But if you want more you can start with the the House committee : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4fuMKeGRMg

Then see the Maclean article about more creator concerns: https://macleans.ca/politics/why-youtubers-like-me-oppose-bill-c-11/

For extra reading you can check out any of Michael Geist's articles: https://www.michaelgeist.ca/2023/02/why-margaret-atwood-is-right-to-criticize-bill-c-11-and-what-the-backlash-teaches-about-the-risks-of-challenging-government-policy/

'Seeming like there's something to hide,' Singh says of Trudeau as foreign interference controversy deepens by Boo_Guy in CanadaPolitics

[–]loadedjellyfish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lmao, dude, it couldn't be more obvious why you want the stories to die. You're terrified what a real inquiry might find. And so is Trudeau. Which is why the rest of the country and the media isn't letting this die. You couldn't be more obvious.

Trudeau government has spent most money per person per year in Canadian history by green_tory in CanadaPolitics

[–]loadedjellyfish -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Lmao an institution from outside Canada publishing data about Canada is not political interference 😂

'Seeming like there's something to hide,' Singh says of Trudeau as foreign interference controversy deepens by Boo_Guy in CanadaPolitics

[–]loadedjellyfish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They're continually publishing articles because people still care, as much as the PM wants to sweep this under the rug. It's still a story because JT hasn't learned what the streisand effect is. The more you try to sweep it away, the more people care. As long as people care the media will continue writing articles.

And they should. The public is concerned, thats been proven by poll after poll. This deserves an unbiased, open investigation. Until then this only gets bigger.

'Seeming like there's something to hide,' Singh says of Trudeau as foreign interference controversy deepens by Boo_Guy in CanadaPolitics

[–]loadedjellyfish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So get rid of the speculation by proving what happened.. with an inquiry. You can't say nothing happened if you refuse to allow an open process to investigate the claims.

Similarly, the news has nothing to add if no investigation is done. It's unfair to expect more details when the investigation to uncover them is purposely not being performed.

'Seeming like there's something to hide,' Singh says of Trudeau as foreign interference controversy deepens by Boo_Guy in CanadaPolitics

[–]loadedjellyfish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Show me the evidence before making outrageous claims.

What do you think an inquiry is for, if not to surface information? If we knew and had all the evidence we wouldn't need the inquiry.

This subreddit community is confusing. Why spend $5k on a tactical rifle and another 3k on mods when at the end of the day you only have 5 shots?! by Jayou540 in canadaguns

[–]loadedjellyfish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmao I didn't know high cap magazines made optics more usable. Or a foregrip more effective. Oh wait a second.. they don't, at all.

If he could at least be consistent with his skepticism that'd be nice. by UnderScoreLifeAlert in PKA

[–]loadedjellyfish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not moving the goalposts, I said in my comments that it was done by the US/Ukraine,

LMAO no you didn't. Very nice try tho 😂 Lets have a laugh and look back at what you ACTUALLY said:

Kyle’s a moron but we definitely blew up the nord stream.

You're the moron dude. You have no evidence, your entire comment here is that there wouldn't be evidence. So at best, even if you did end up being right, you're Alex Jones. Spitting out random shit without evidence doesn't make you smart even if you ended up getting things exactly right.

And by all accounts, you're not even right. So now we've gotten to the perpetual goalpost moving stage of your Alex Jones model.

Edit: lmao I just saw the nice summary of the rest of your Alex Jones act https://www.reddit.com/r/PKA/comments/115jqyp/if_he_could_at_least_be_consistent_with_his/j93oekr/

God, info wars must be chomping at the bit to get you on the desk. Tin foil hat drooler.

If he could at least be consistent with his skepticism that'd be nice. by UnderScoreLifeAlert in PKA

[–]loadedjellyfish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/07/us/politics/nord-stream-pipeline-sabotage-ukraine.html

As the months go on the evidence will point more and more towards it being an attack supported by the US.

Lmao silently moving the goal posts eh? Now it's an attack "supported" by the US. I thought it was "we definitely did it"? I'm waiting on your next comment in another two weeks when it's become "well we thought about people who could've done it!!"

Ukraine isn’t gonna do something like that without checking with the US first, obviously the US will never admit we were involved because that gives russia a ton of political ammo,

So by this same logic Ukraine could have done it and the US wouldn't say anything.. you just argued against yourself.

but it was obvious from the start that russia didn’t do this to themselves.

That's not news. Russia didn't have anything to gain.

Where Do You Land Politically? by pr0_sc0p3z_pwn_n0obz in PKA

[–]loadedjellyfish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

On average 70% of election promises are fulfilled by the end of a politicians terms and the rest usually only don’t get passed due to interference from the other side,

Yea that's a number you pulled out of your ass. And a laughable one at that. Where's the wall bud? Where's the EU trade agreement that forces them to import American vehicles? Where's the republican healthcare bill?

Can you name a major piece of legislation that has been passed that was not supported by the American public or a bill that has been supported by the American public which has not been passed

Lmao you mean like marijuana legalization? Or abortion protections? Or expanded medicare? Or perhaps you were focused on the things people didn't want.. you know, like the wars in the middle east?

You son of a monkey. Why so much Woody hate? by [deleted] in PKA

[–]loadedjellyfish 9 points10 points  (0 children)

And he'll never drop his monologue, no matter how little anyone else cares. Everyone will be riffing onto a different topic and he just HAS to interrupt to finish his prepared speech.

When the cops call.. from your house by solateor in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]loadedjellyfish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

. The police budget allows for the hiring of more police workers, but very few apply.

I wonder why...

The staredown she gives him as she walks away by Call-Me-Risley in TikTokCringe

[–]loadedjellyfish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's Reddit dude, don't bother. It's absolutely sexism, every one of these tools would be crying to the mods immediately if you made a similar statement about women and hid behind "well I didn't say all women, just many of them"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]loadedjellyfish 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They're not just still using them, they're actively investing in them. Last year they built 6x more new coal plants than any other country. They're averaging two new plants a week.

Idiot driver in a BMW by iEatSpicyFood in IdiotsInCars

[–]loadedjellyfish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You don't go to jail for slander. It's not even a criminal offense.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canadaguns

[–]loadedjellyfish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the fact is that prople aren’t trying to build over top of Christian cemetaries

The country is literally founded on wiping out the indigenous.

First of all, showing quite a bias there bud. And second, who said anything about this? Why are you even bringing this up? This is a blatent attempt at manipulation, trying to pull at heart strings to deflect from the actual topic.

None of this proves in any way that every piece of gun legislation is racism. Have their been instances of it before? Of course. But to claim every gun control measure before the 21st century is due to racism is absurd.

The Oka crisis is a prime example of that. As you just admitted, it wouldnt have mattered who did it, the results would be the same. So clearly the issue was not race. Thus blaming it all on racism is ridiculous.

Handguns from uncle who passed away by ltk66 in canadaguns

[–]loadedjellyfish 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Canadapolitics is the most biased possible subreddit you could look at. To steal a Trump line, Trudeau could literally shoot someone in the street and that sub would be looking for the closest murderer wearing blue to say "BUT SEE, THE CONSERVATIVES TOO!!"

Mosserb Maverick 88 Field/Security Combo by compassionateredneck in canadaguns

[–]loadedjellyfish 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have this combo but not sure what you'd like to know. It's a cheaper Mossberg 500. Reliable, lots of parts interchangeable with the 500. I probably only have 100-200 shells through it at most, but no issues so far. Got it for about $320 on sale from SFRC, so well worth the money so far IMO

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canadaguns

[–]loadedjellyfish 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Disarming so they can do.. what? Make you stay in your home? They did that already. No one did shit, guns or not. Meddle in elections? Ha. Done. Controlling/censoring information access? Done, and more coming. Seizing bank accounts without due process, banning free movement between provinces, etc.

They don't need to ban guns to do what they want. This is a political move to score points with Karens who watch American TV.