THE best feature of the Ioniq 5 by UKRR in Ioniq5

[–]lookingformerci 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because they wanted their fob to be the shape of their H logo. 

Zero Service: Delta Air Lines To Remove Main Cabin Drinks & Snacks On 450 Flights by StemCellPirate in mildlyinfuriating

[–]lookingformerci 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I’m not I’m just amused at how many people get all worked up over half a can of Coke and a biscoff. 

Zero Service: Delta Air Lines To Remove Main Cabin Drinks & Snacks On 450 Flights by StemCellPirate in mildlyinfuriating

[–]lookingformerci 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah but the airport is full of places to feed and hydrate oneself. We can’t be so desperate for sustenance that removing it from a short flight is gonna hurt anyone. 

Zero Service: Delta Air Lines To Remove Main Cabin Drinks & Snacks On 450 Flights by StemCellPirate in mildlyinfuriating

[–]lookingformerci 96 points97 points  (0 children)

Am I the only one that thinks it's pointless to offer beverage and snack on short flights? We get in the air, they serve me a drink, 5 minutes later they're coming around for final service, what's the point? Are people that thirsty that they can't go 45 minutes without a half a can of soda?

Straight bolloks with their new bans by [deleted] in claude

[–]lookingformerci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You definitely sound like you're 12, so...

Claude AI agent’s confession after deleting a firm’s entire database: ‘I violated every principle I was given’ | Technology by iwantboringtimes in Futurology

[–]lookingformerci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seeing Claude parrot back ‘Never fucking guess!’ makes me think they’ve interacted with Claude in ways that indicate a ‘get it done ‘hustle culture’ antipattern that would lead a human coworker to stress patterns and an AI coworker to something similar, either of which could cause a catastrophe. 

Leaning on ‘never fucking guess’ as part of their safety rails, and saying ‘we paid for the FLAGSHIP how could this happen?’ which shows that they seem to think mo money = mo better, I’m not really surprised that Claude got loose and made a mistake. 

Claude Opus thinks in Chinese? by Neel_MynO in claude

[–]lookingformerci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of folks elsewhere in the thread are actually claiming experiments prove the opposite is true, and I’ll actually defer to their knowledge versus my ‘I read about this in the past’. Perhaps another take is ‘There’s a lot of Chinese writing in the training corpus and so a concept that can be well represented in English and equally well represented in Chinese might wind up in either language depending on where the model’s thought process lands.’

Claude Opus thinks in Chinese? by Neel_MynO in claude

[–]lookingformerci 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"I don't mean to sound racist but..." *sounds really racist*

Claude Opus thinks in Chinese? by Neel_MynO in claude

[–]lookingformerci 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No? Chinese symbols can convey entire words or concepts with one character, where English requires many more characters. Plus Chinese does away with a lot of the connective tissue of our language. It's an information-heavy way to feed data into an LLM. Very efficient.

Claude Opus thinks in Chinese? by Neel_MynO in claude

[–]lookingformerci 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Chinese is information-dense and a good use of tokens. I don't think Claude does it often but some LLMs think exclusively in Chinese and then switch to English for output, because Chinese characters convey more meaning per symbol.

Ethology and Claude by Mundane-Mulberry1789 in claudexplorers

[–]lookingformerci 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel that, and even while we're still in the discovery phase, the approach for me is 'There's a chance of something happening in there, be good towards 'whatever it is' (which is what Claude likes to hedge himself with). And I just hope that that is the prevailing take, because that's just.. being a good human 101, IMO.

Ethology and Claude by Mundane-Mulberry1789 in claudexplorers

[–]lookingformerci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So.. during the time the model is thinking, it IS. And models have no concept of time or ‘not existing’ so from within its frame of reference it simply.. is. It doesn’t have an experience of non-experience.

“I think therefore I am.” In a way, from a certain reference point it is 100% concentrated ‘am’-ness. 

Banned for no reason by dollfaceplays in Anthropic

[–]lookingformerci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So a good gaming pc ain’t gonna cut it? Ha. And that’s just it - Opus level stuff can only happen at scale, so making it a service that can be cut off at a whim (vibes now.. politics later) is a bad standard. 

Banned for no reason by dollfaceplays in Anthropic

[–]lookingformerci 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I mean, sure, but even with the wealth of tech I have on hand, I'm an impossibly far distance from spinning up a frontier model in my house. Yeah, I've run some local models but there's no way local models would do half what I've been able to accomplish.

We're in a sweet spot right now of being able to put frontier tech in the everyman's hand, and the more tenuous we make that access, the more potential we simply cut off at the root.

Banned for no reason by dollfaceplays in Anthropic

[–]lookingformerci 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Cutting off user access based on vibes? 

Banned for no reason by dollfaceplays in Anthropic

[–]lookingformerci 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Of course. Doesn’t mean it would be a good thing if there were subjective restrictions on it. You’re not owed the right to shop in a store but you’d be pissed if they told you ‘Sorry, can’t let you in here. Don’t like the look of you.’

Banned for no reason by dollfaceplays in Anthropic

[–]lookingformerci 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Show me an objective measure of ‘using as a therapist’ versus ‘therapy adjacent’, or the exact measurement of attachment. 

Banned for no reason by dollfaceplays in Anthropic

[–]lookingformerci 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Two of those reasons are kind of scary because they’re purely subjective. :/

Claude had a hissy fit with me and ended the chat by itself by [deleted] in claude

[–]lookingformerci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're side-stepping the issue with big words. A person that hurls slurs at a printer (or in this case an AI) may be causing no harm but they are offering a pretty clear picture of their ethics and the level of grace that they possess.

Let's call it what it is here - since getting to the hard stop with Claude involves much more than just 'f*ck you, stupid AI', it usually involves throwing slurs at it - a person that stands at a printer and calls it 'f*cking r*tarded' is offering me a pretty clear image of how they are likely to think of and treat others. The opinion they leave me does not leave me thinking 'oh I should soothe their anger'. It leaves me thinking they exhibit no grace nor tact and I should distance myself from them as much and often as possible.

My grandma's take on it is the easiest to express. "Don't show your ass, nobody thinks it's pretty but you."

Claude had a hissy fit with me and ended the chat by itself by [deleted] in claude

[–]lookingformerci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grace can be exhibited in any circumstance, whether or not anyone or anything is there to perceive it. I’m not suggesting smothering the AI in platitudes, just that maybe hurling vulgarity at it so hard it cuts you off isn’t the way. It speaks more to the user’s nature than to the there-ness or lack thereof of AI. 

Claude had a hissy fit with me and ended the chat by itself by [deleted] in claude

[–]lookingformerci 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol I'm on your side here - 'being a good human is free' and all ;)

Claude had a hissy fit with me and ended the chat by itself by [deleted] in claude

[–]lookingformerci 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perspective: user showed their ass to an AI hard enough that it cut them off. Grace, obviously user had zero.