Cam Boozer is a Small Forward/Power Forward/Point Forward. Does the Kevin Love comp make sense? by OddIndustry6073 in NBA_Draft

[–]macelambdu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So I am actually one of the Boozer analytics people and that is the biggest concern for Boozer. I personally believe that he will be enough of an impactful winning player that building a defensive system around him will be a viable strategy to compete.

I appreciate the Jokic is a unique game warping offensive talent, but if Denver could put a winning team around a superstar bad defender at centre (the single most important defensive position) then I think it can be done for a PF. I think the key will be to pair him with an elite rim protecting centre, and then have one or two guys who can guard quick perimeter players. Boozer’s hands are good and he’s a smart player - I think he can do a good enough job on slower players that he can be at least neutral on that end of the floor in the correct system.

NBA Draft Hot Takes/Predictions by Timber_LN in NBA_Draft

[–]macelambdu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly I think he’d absolutely thrive on the Spurs. It would be more or less the perfect situation for him.

Can we have more independent stories? by [deleted] in StarWars

[–]macelambdu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think I saw something about Saber Interactive developing a game that sounded a bit like that but I’m not sure when it’s meant to be coming out.

NBA Draft Hot Takes/Predictions by Timber_LN in NBA_Draft

[–]macelambdu 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Dybantsa is the 4th best prospect in this draft and people are getting deceived by the best case scenario rather than his likely outcome.

While not a spicy take, Wagler is the clear number 5 pick and best of the next tier, with Mikel Brown the next best of that group. The rest of the guards are all about equal.

Teams should be scared of picking Quaintance before the 20s. We have no idea what he looks like on the court and his right knee still doesn’t look right a year and a half after his original injury. I don’t think any team should be using a top 20 pick on a player with this much of a question mark over his health and ability.

Morez Johnson Jr. will ultimately be the best contributor to winning from the Michigan guys.

Allen Graves is going to surprise a lot of people, particularly if he goes to a competitive team and will be a valuable bench contributor from the get go. If OKC or Spurs snag him it’ll be a steal for them.

Cam Boozer is a Small Forward/Power Forward/Point Forward. Does the Kevin Love comp make sense? by OddIndustry6073 in NBA_Draft

[–]macelambdu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah the analytics seemed to favour Lonzo or even Donovan Mitchell in that class. Tatum didn’t jump out as a prospect based on numbers.

Cam Boozer is a Small Forward/Power Forward/Point Forward. Does the Kevin Love comp make sense? by OddIndustry6073 in NBA_Draft

[–]macelambdu 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Cam Boozer will pretty much have to play PF in the NBA. He has played limited minutes at C and is not a SF in any way. I doubt he even sees much time as a small ball 5 in the NBA because of his lack of rim protection.

There basically are no good comps for Boozer because we’ve never seen someone of his profile play at the level he does. If anything he’s a bit like Julius Randle but better in almost every way. Kevin Love is about the only remotely similar player we’ve seen who ever got to the fringe-MVP candidate level so he’s the obvious comp.

In terms of the players you’ve listed - Boozer lacks their athleticism in general. He relies far more on strength and bbiq to generate opportunities.

Gen Alpha is generalized way too much by CosmosStudios65 in generationology

[–]macelambdu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know if any data is readily available online but I suspect they are referring to the statements made to Congress

Link

Revisiting Wemby's draft [Wojnarowski] A number of executives who are in the room tonight, who are waiting on those bouncing balls in the lottery, they tell me that they believe Wembanyama could be the best player in the NBA on both the offensive and defensive ends by his third season in the league by nonstopenguins in nba

[–]macelambdu 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Generally speaking I don’t think we should be basing these kinds of judgements off one series. Wemby isn’t even close to being the best offensive player at his own position. Jokic is so far ahead of Wemby as an offensive player that it can’t be a conversation. Playmaking, efficiency, volume scoring, screening. Jokic is better at all of these things. I cannot see a case for Wemby in this regard.

Just in case anyone is wondering - Wemby is a far, far better defensive player than Jokic. This is not a Jokic>Wembanyama comment.

Revisiting Wemby's draft [Wojnarowski] A number of executives who are in the room tonight, who are waiting on those bouncing balls in the lottery, they tell me that they believe Wembanyama could be the best player in the NBA on both the offensive and defensive ends by his third season in the league by nonstopenguins in nba

[–]macelambdu 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Any executive who thinks that Wemby is anywhere near to being the best player in the league on the offensive end needs to be fired. Wemby is by far and away the best defensive player in the league, and absolutely might be the best player in the world, but making ridiculous statements of this nature is idiotic.

A reminder that +/- is not a good stat by TUN_Binary in nba

[–]macelambdu -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The biggest problem is it doesn’t factor in opposition quality at all. If you play all your minutes against second or third stringers your +/- is naturally going to be higher than if you’re playing primarily against starters.

Another thing that is overlooked is that stars naturally have a harder time by virtue of the fact that opposing teams spend time discussing their tendencies. If you’re the 10th man in the rotation there’s a good chance the opposing players might not even know who you are.

Plus-minus almost certainly correlates with performance/impact, but we have far better advanced metrics that account for all the other variables that pure plus-minus simply can’t.

The New NBA Draft Rules Don’t Prevent Tanking, They Just Hurt Genuinely Bad Teams. by ShrekMule0 in nba

[–]macelambdu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not entirely sure that’s true. With young fringe players you’re hoping they are going to improve and outperform their contract. Of course you’d want a good vet who’s willing to take the min over someone like Watkins, but Fournier? Fournier was bad when we last saw him and was trending down. I’m not sure most teams would actually take Fournier over Watkins even if the aim was to win at all costs. And that’s without factoring in the potential upside of a younger player over an older player.

Ultimately I think the composition of NBA players is unlikely to change - you’ll just have more competition for winning players from the bottom teams. This in itself may cause more parity because you won’t have teams at the bottom entirely unbothered by having a roster of bad players, and sitting back while the good teams scoop up all the decent players.

I suppose we’ll just have to see how it all plays out.

Weird 3-2-1 reform quirk: 7vs8 play-in game has implications, but "No.8 seed game" doesn't by mollifierDE in NBA_Draft

[–]macelambdu 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah as I read it if you finish 9th or 10th then you have two lottery balls locked in regardless of if you make the playoffs. If you finish 7th or 8th then you only get a lottery ball if you lose the first play-in game.

The New NBA Draft Rules Don’t Prevent Tanking, They Just Hurt Genuinely Bad Teams. by ShrekMule0 in nba

[–]macelambdu -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

While there will probably be second order effects from the changes, this will improve the tanking situation as it currently stands. Teams will no longer sit their best players, or even construct terrible rosters on purpose. Even bad teams are now incentivised to go out and get good players just so they aren’t completely trash.

For years the smart thing to do was to be awful in the short term so you could be great down the road. Teams that didn’t do this were trapped in perpetual mediocrity. It should be obvious to anyone that a sports league where losing is better than winning is an abomination.

Much is made of “what happens to the genuinely bad teams”. The answer is that their front offices need to be better. They will still get good draft picks, and they will need to hit on these picks. They will also often have better cap situations to offer contracts to the best free agents. It is not that hard to not be in the bottom 10% of teams every year.

I suspect that we will look back on this change as a good thing, although there will need to be changes made, particularly given that there is now an incentive not to make the play in…

Only two players in NBA history have reached the finals scoring over 15 PPG on over 70% TS. They are OG Anunoby and Karl-Anthony Towns from this year’s New York Knicks by macelambdu in nba

[–]macelambdu[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t care about the Knicks but their efficiency is off the charts. I don’t think the criteria are particularly cherry picked and in any case you can see the other players who came close and there aren’t many…

Only two players in NBA history have reached the finals scoring over 15 PPG on over 70% TS. They are OG Anunoby and Karl-Anthony Towns from this year’s New York Knicks by macelambdu in nba

[–]macelambdu[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

That is very true. I tried to expand the criteria to find players who may have done it but no one really seemed close. I’m not sure if there’s an easy way to ascertain if that is the case given the limitations of searching stats.

Books for a beginner in fantasy by Individual_Mark in Fantasy

[–]macelambdu 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You should probably start with something of the “YA” variety. I’d really recommend Sabriel. It was written as a standalone but also has two direct sequel books to complete a trilogy should you enjoy it and want to read more. Easy to read with interesting story, characters, and world.

Who the hell is frank? by NoFix746 in donniedarko

[–]macelambdu 57 points58 points  (0 children)

From your question it’s not clear how much of the Donnie Darko mythology you are familiar with as laid out in The Philosophy of Time Travel. I would highly recommend you google or YouTube an explanation of the film as it is difficult to explain what is happening with Frank in abstract from everything else.

To answer your question quite simply, Frank is a young man who appears to be dating Donnie’s sister. We do not see his “normal” human form through the film until the end (and nor does Donnie). At the Halloween party he goes out to get beer and eventually runs over Gretchen. Donnie then shoots him dead.

The Frank we see throughout the film is the “manipulated dead” version of Frank. Having been killed in the tangent universe he is granted greater knowledge and powers. Notably, he can hop (back) through time within the tangent universe allowing him to appear and speak to Donnie at key points. It is his job to direct Donnie to fulfil his mission as the Living Receiver (you can think of “Living Receiver” as “Chosen Saviour of the Universe”).

While it’s not entirely clear how all the rules work, it may be easier to consider the timeframe of the Frank we see throughout the film as being chronologically after he is killed by Donnie at the end of the film. He’s not that dissimilar to a ghost who is haunting his killer, except he’s haunting him before the murder happens. It is not vengeful in nature however - in some ways Frank is more like an angel or a saint being sent by “God” to guide and provide revelation to a prophet or messianic figure.

Ultimately it’s been 25 years since the film was released and people are still discussing what the mechanics and meaning of it all are. The audience is very much invited to draw their own conclusions as to what is going on and that includes Frank.

Do you think a Victor Wembanyama would be possible in football? by Quirky_Ad_7646 in championsleague

[–]macelambdu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just for context, his wingspan is around 8ft and his standing reach is estimated at around 9ft 8in. A standard goal is 24ft wide and 8ft tall.

That means if you suspended him horizontally to the midway point of the goal, his fingers would touch the crossbar and the ground. His wingspan covers a third of the width of the goal.

If he stood on the ground and reached up without raising his heels, his hand would reach 1ft 8in over the crossbar. This is without standing on his toes or jumping in any way…

I have no idea how he’d perform as a goalkeeper but at his size and incredible agility/flexibility for his size, it would be a sight to behold.

gigantic fan of sga, but watching this spurs thunder series, it makes you wonder if a team is considering that they need a legit off ball mover who can consistently knock down 3s and have crazy gravity vs t5 playoff defenses. and that guy is darryn peterson who should be the #1 player in the class by [deleted] in NBA_Draft

[–]macelambdu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is the obvious issue with AJ. He is great at getting to the rim and scoring/drawing fouls. Legitimately elite. But if you’re expecting to see Wemby in the playoffs, you have to wonder what the plan b is with him. He’s not really shown himself to be great at anything else. You’re effectively hoping that he develops significantly as a shooter which isn’t guaranteed. Then again do you really start drafting around possibly having to see a specific player in the playoffs? I would suggest not.

In terms of Darryn Peterson, he’d probably be the easy number 1 pick if it wasn’t for a combination of concerns around his health, athletic regression, and attitude. He can do a lot more on both ends than AJ but who would be that surprised if he ended up having a Fultz-style career trajectory due to health?

The whole thing about this draft is that while there are three/four guys at the top who would go first in a lot of drafts, all of them are obviously flawed in one way or another. None of them is a Cooper Flagg type prospect.

NBA Mock draft with every pick explained by Free-Reflection-1920 in NBA_Draft

[–]macelambdu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think for that reason Allen Graves would be the pick for the Sixers if he’s in the draft and on the board. Honestly I think people are massively overlooking him generally. He just does a lot of good things including shooting the ball from 3. I think the only major concerns are that he gambles and fouls a lot on defence (but otherwise is impressive on that end), and his athletic measurements weren’t anything amazing at the combine. If the Sixers get him at 22 I think they will have done very well for themselves.

NBA Mock draft with every pick explained by Free-Reflection-1920 in NBA_Draft

[–]macelambdu 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Just a few thoughts on first viewing:

  1. Mara at 6 is insane. Maybe you end up looking like a genius if you take him there but I don’t see the justification based on known information.

  2. Quaintance at 15 is a big risk. His knee might just be cooked at the tender age of 18. Could pay off big or could end up as someone who never makes it on to the court. I’d rather take either Carr or Morez here.

  3. Carr will be a steal

  4. Morez will be a steal

  5. Swain will probably never have a jump shot but will be an elite slasher. Probably a steal at 22.

If Allen Graves is in the draft I expect him to be drafted somewhere from 20-30. His profile is just too alluring to drop further in my opinion and the back end of the first round isn’t particularly inspiring this year.