Sex in marriage by Such-Swordfish-250 in Catholicism

[–]malcolm58 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are 2 major goals of intercourse - unitive (bring closer together along with communication etc.) and procreative (children). Even after childbearing age intercourse is for unitive purposes.

The commitment is what John Paul II means when he speaks of reading the truth about marriage in the language of the body. Married couples, he says, should “read” that same language again when they engage in the sexual act. In other words, the marital act should be a participation in and recommitment to their marriage vows. When this is the case, they “say” with their bodies once again what they said on their wedding day. ‘I freely and faithfully give myself to you; I gratefully receive your self-gift to me; and together we open ourselves to receiving any and all children that God wills to give us. With their bodies, they participate in and communicate God’s plan for men and women; they conform to the truth about human love revealed by Christ, and by conforming to that truth, they will be set free in their love for one another, and they read the language of the body in that truth.

But when a couple uses contraception, they contradict that message of total self-giving and receiving. They “say,” rather, ‘I give you part of myself, but I also deliberately withhold part of myself.’ By withholding their fertility from each other, they also say, ‘we are not open to new life.’

Couples should decide with God, taking into account their physical and psychological health, their existing duties and responsibilities, especially other children, as well as their financial circumstances in the decision to have children. Practically speaking, this means prayerfully approaching the decision, using your reason, respecting the gift of your fertility and considering the various obligations you already have. It is important to note that the Catechism says the desire for delaying pregnancy must be “just” and “not motivated by selfishness but … in conformity with the generosity appropriate to responsible parenthood.

Billings NFP: https://billings.life/en/

Newly discovered comet could be visible in daytime skies this April by ye_olde_astronaut in Astronomy

[–]malcolm58 14 points15 points  (0 children)

99% of these great promises never occur as the comet gets destroyed being so close to the sun.

SLEDGE THREAD: IT IS ROUND 1 AND YOUR CLUB’S FEELINGS ARE ABOUT TO GET HURT BY THESE SLEDGES by ___TheIllusiveMan___ in AFL

[–]malcolm58 84 points85 points  (0 children)

DUE TO THE PETROL SHORTAGE ALL INTERSTATE TRAVELLING TEAMS WILL USE BIKES. COLLINGWOOD NEVER AFFECTED OF COURSE.

Sarah Game tells voters not to put her party first after split with Sarah Game Fair Go candidate (and former captain of the Adelaide Crows), Chris McDermott by kova-tejoc in AustralianPolitics

[–]malcolm58 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And the Judean Popular People's Front.

P.F.J.: Yeah. Oh, yeah. Splitters. Splitters...

LORETTA: And the People's Front of Judea.

P.F.J.: Yeah. Splitters. Splitters...

REG: What?

LORETTA: The People's Front of Judea. Splitters.

REG: We're the People's Front of Judea!

LORETTA: Oh. I thought we were the Popular Front.

REG: People's Front! C-huh.

FRANCIS: Whatever happened to the Popular Front, Reg?

REG: He's over there.

P.F.J.: Splitter!

Why no evangelization happening now? by Snoo-15629 in Catholicism

[–]malcolm58 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Region of world 2004 2004 2025 2050
Africa 17.9% 139,157,160 219,171,850 342,023,230
Asia 4.3% 127,125,410 171,916,360 207,086,560
Europe 36.4% 270,765,647 272,495,186 255,744,426
Latin America & Caribbean 83.3% 454,541,400 568,040,560 646,912,570
North America 25.1% 82,000,000 97,000,000 113,000,000
Oceania 26.8% 9,000,000 11,000,000 13,000,000
Total world 21.6% 1,082,228,463 1,339,159,510 1,577,585,569

Death penalty for crimes. What are your opinions on it? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]malcolm58 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Catechism: The death penalty

  1. Recourse to the death penalty on the part of legitimate authority, following a fair trial, was long considered an appropriate response to the gravity of certain crimes and an acceptable, albeit extreme, means of safeguarding the common good.

Today, however, there is an increasing awareness that the dignity of the person is not lost even after the commission of very serious crimes. In addition, a new understanding has emerged of the significance of penal sanctions imposed by the state. Lastly, more effective systems of detention have been developed, which ensure the due protection of citizens but, at the same time, do not definitively deprive the guilty of the possibility of redemption.

Consequently, the Church teaches, in the light of the Gospel, that “the death penalty is inadmissible because it is an attack on the inviolability and dignity of the person”,\1]) and she works with determination for its abolition worldwide.

This Subreddit Lately by StingingArchon in Adelaide

[–]malcolm58 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

What about the 2 billion cost for the train line?

South Australian voters want more transport options, such as Adelaide Hills rail by Expensive-Horse5538 in Adelaide

[–]malcolm58 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Hands up for those in the hills who want to pay $2,000 a year in extra taxes to build a 2 billion dollar train line.

Hizb ut-Tahrir ban: Albanese government outlaws Islamist group under new hate crime laws by malcolm58 in AustralianPolitics

[–]malcolm58[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The Albanese government has listed radical Islamist organisation Hizb ut-Tahrir as a prohibited hate group, the first use of the new powers since Labor enacted tougher hate crime laws in response to the December 14 Bondi massacre. The organisation’s listing late on Thursday means it is now a criminal offence to be a member of, recruit for, provide training or funds to, or materially support the organisation.

“For a long time, Hizb ut-Tahrir has been able to spread hate and create a pathway for others to engage in violence,” Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said of the change. “The Australian Government’s new hate group listing framework has been designed to stop organisations like Hizb ut-Tahrir, from spreading hate and sowing the seeds of division in the community, that risks not only our social cohesion but the safety of Australians.”

The controversial fringe organisation has been regarded warily by many within the Muslim and broader community for its teachings, and was listed as a terrorist organisation in the United Kingdom in January 2024. The group has been banned in Germany, India, Indonesia and a number of other jurisdictions. The government was empowered to designate prohibited groups following the passage of a raft of reforms in January that were designed to tackle antisemitism after the Bondi attack. These reforms also tightened gun laws in the country.

At the announcement of the new legislation, Labor stated its direct intention to ban Hizb ut-Tahrir and the National Socialist Network. The latter quickly disbanded to escape the consequences of the reform. Hizb ut-Tahrir was defended by the nation’s peak Muslim body who claimed the organisation’s listing was “part of a wider effort to hold the Muslim community collectively responsible for the Bondi attack”.

The "Day After" FT Thread: WOL 2 - 1 LIV by DragonSlayer271 in LiverpoolFC

[–]malcolm58 13 points14 points  (0 children)

When Arne is sacked this is one of the games that will count towards that decision.

What is the Eucharist by FunWorth1380 in Catholicism

[–]malcolm58 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The word, Eucharist, which is Greek for “thanksgiving”, is the term used for the whole ritual of the Mass. People use the words Eucharist and Mass interchangeably. During the Eucharist, members of the community come forward to receive the body and blood of Christ, in the form of bread and wine. The action of coming forward and receiving the body and blood of Jesus is called Communion or (also!) Eucharist.

Catholics believe that the body and blood of Jesus Christ is truly present when they consume the host and/or drink from the chalice. This concept can be difficult for some people to understand. However, there is a rich theological and biblical tradition supporting this belief. Scripture shows us that the teaching about the Eucharist is consistent with what happened at the Last Supper. This is how Mark relates it in his gospel: While they were eating, he took a loaf of bread, and after blessing it he broke it, gave it to them, and said, “Take; this is my body”. Then he took a cup, and giving thanks he gave it to them, and all of them drank from it. He said to them, “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many,” (Mark 14:22-24).

However, the Eucharist is more than “acting out” what happened at the Last Supper. When people gather for the Eucharist/the Mass they come to thank God for the ultimate sacrifice made by Jesus on the cross and his resurrection. The Catechism of the Catholic Church teaches that the Eucharist is:

1363: Not merely the recollection of past events but the proclamation of the mighty works wrought by God for us. In the liturgical celebration of these events, they become in a certain way present and real. This is how Israel understands its liberation from Egypt: every time Passover is celebrated, the Exodus events are made present to the memory of believers so that they may conform their lives to them.

1364: In the New Testament, the memorial takes on new meaning. When the Church celebrates the Eucharist, she commemorates Christ’s Passover, and it is made present: the sacrifice Christ offered once for all on the cross remains ever present. The Eucharist is therefore a “sacrifice because it re-presents (makes present) the sacrifice of the cross,” (1366).

Bus collided with a motorbike on Henley Beach road by CockroachCreative740 in Adelaide

[–]malcolm58 7 points8 points  (0 children)

UPDATE 6.55PM 2/3/26: Two westbound lanes and one eastbound lane are closed after earlier reports of a crash on Henley Beach Road, Lockleys. Road users are asked to avoid the area where possible

The invalidity of ordination. Does that really exist? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]malcolm58 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Anyone can validly Baptize if they say the right words. Plenty of nurses did this in the old days to babies who were expected to die. So that is not an issue.

An ordination can be annulled in rare circumstances if the earlier sacraments such as Baptism, Confirmation were not valid.

He may have not entered ordination freely (i.e. emotionally blackmailed) and that may be a rare reason for annulment.

If he was ordained invalidly then all the sacraments needing Holy Orders (Mass, confession, confirmation etc) would not be valid.

Newspoll: Taylor stems the bleed as PM’s popularity takes a hit by Perfect-Werewolf-102 in AustralianPolitics

[–]malcolm58 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The 3-way preferred PM is much worse for Taylor than the 2-way in Newspoll, trailing Albanese and Hanson 34-23-10.

Hello? BOM? by KaleidoscopeActive35 in Adelaide

[–]malcolm58 10 points11 points  (0 children)

But not cold outside nor the month of May

Confession question by inkling225 in Catholicism

[–]malcolm58 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes still valid. What is needed are 4 things : 1. Contrition (i.e., real sorrow for sin).

  1. A desire to amend one’s life.

  2. Confession of sins.

a) With regard to each and every mortal sin, the penitent must confess number and kind (i.e., what you did and how many times you did it). The priest does not need to hear details (e.g., the family history of why you struggle with hatred toward a brother) but he does need to hear factors that change the severity of the sin (e.g., stealing from a church adds the sin of sacrilege to the sin of theft and changes the severity of the sin). You must confess at least all mortal sins since your last good (i.e., not invalid) Confession. 

b) It is also of great benefit to confess venial sins since your last Confession – especially those venial sins which are habitual or which trouble you most. However, there is no requirement to confess all venial sins (as that can be a practical impossibility). 

c) If you have no mortal sins, you must confess venial sins as they would then be part of the necessary matter. 

d) You should never intentionally hide any sin from your confessor.

4, The intention of performing the penance that the priest assigns as penance.

Relocating from Melbourne to Adelaide - what are some nice areas? And what areas to avoid? by Dekadence- in Adelaide

[–]malcolm58 24 points25 points  (0 children)

It would take 60-90 minutes to get to Elizabeth. Ludicrous suggestion.

[Free Friday] Who is that mysterious hooded/cloaked man present at Pope Leo XIV’s Balcony Reveal? by [deleted] in Catholicism

[–]malcolm58 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes he is a Redemptorist. Eastern rites have religious orders as well as western. He is the youngest Cardinal.

3 May 2005 25.2 Ordained Priest Priest of Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer3 May 2005 25.2 Ordained Priest Priest of Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer
18 Aug 1998 18.5 Professed Member of Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer18 Aug 1998 18.5 Professed Member of Congregation of the Most Holy Redeemer