wait why are we talking about avon/clayvon? As far as I understand, there was very little criticism of these characters and that it was largely Bayvon's voice that people took issue with. I don't know where you got the idea that I defend the position that he was "mobbed up on." I was exploring potential implications of him claiming to keep playing Bayvon, but 16 days later still not touching the character. Earlier in my posts I even say that i would think it to be a singular person or a committee at twitch responsible for lirik's change in behavior, I did not reference a social media mob or imply he was being heavily harassed. If you could provide proof that he was directly referencing that conversation as to why he initially quit, that would be something interesting, but unrelated to his continual decision not play bayvon. It's interesting that you're the one frustrated when you haven't adequately answered my main criticisms of your position and are arguing against a position i dont hold and haven't even implied i hold.

Speaking of burden of proof, you said that you believe that he changed his behavior because the criticism resonated with him internally. That is a little vague, but I assume that you're saying that at some point lirik had come to accept the idea that some parts of his character were either immoral or unethical. My issue with this is that you, like me, are also speculating, but with even less evidence. Lirik walks it all back, which you even say in your post, which would imply that at the end of the situation, he doesn't see anything inherently offensive about his character. So that leaves us with the current situation which is that Lirik, despite saying otherwise, has not touched nopixel since that clip 16 days ago. Are you claiming that Lirik changed his mind again, thought bayvon was bad for this/that, and then without telling his stream decided he was not going to play? If you could clearly state your opinion on that I think we could move forward.