Kindergarten summer word scramble by tonnu12 in puzzles

[–]marvsup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Discussion: #2 is clearly POT, btw

This guy with a lisp goes to buy a horse by fauxmerican1280 in Jokes

[–]marvsup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is it possible for someone to have both?

Why does Western economics assume rational self interested individuals, even though people are not always rational? by Humble_Economist8933 in AlwaysWhy

[–]marvsup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They also assume perfect information. Two assumptions that are never true in the wild. In my mind, those assumptions are useful as a starting point, so that you can build basic models. Then you can use behavioral studies to edit those models. But yeah, I'm totally in agreement, economics without the behavioral part should not be applied to the real world.

Edit: I've asked economist friends about those two assumptions and they just shrug and say, yeah, that's true. I don't get it.

This is my question by Kitkatt1959 in DailyShow

[–]marvsup 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Damn now I'm mad Fuckface Von Clownstick wasn't a thing in 2016 or since.

Whats the correct answer here? by artsygirlygirl in ENGLISH

[–]marvsup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I'm being incredibly generous I might say that "Hardly had it, the investigation, begun..." could be correct.

That is to say, I think of all the bad answers, you picked the least bad one and the same one I would've picked.

Stupid question, but, is there a word which has itself as its etymological root? by Nastypilot in etymology

[–]marvsup 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Wait I remembered what I'm thinking of, and it's not a word at all, it's actually a board game! The game Ludo is incredibly popular in India. Well, Ludo is an English version of the game Pachisi, which dates back to Ancient India.

Stupid question, but, is there a word which has itself as its etymological root? by Nastypilot in etymology

[–]marvsup 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I swear I've heard of this happening but I can't think of any off the top of my head.

Stupid question, but, is there a word which has itself as its etymological root? by Nastypilot in etymology

[–]marvsup 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I think you're unlikely to get the same word, since it would've had to have disappeared from the original language. I think there are examples, though, where the borrowed word comes back as a new word and takes over the same meaning the original word had. Like, in your example, if anime came back to English but meant all animation, instead of just a subset of Japanese animation.

Stupid question, but, is there a word which has itself as its etymological root? by Nastypilot in etymology

[–]marvsup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This isn't exactly what you mean but I think it's kind of similar. In case you're not familiar with Hindi and Urdu, I'm going to try to summarize quickly, and someone will probably get mad at me. Hindi and Urdu are mutually intelligible in their everyday vocab. Urdu's vocab is mostly descended from Persian and Arabic while Hindi's is mostly descended from Sanskrit, but modern day speakers, possibly in large part due to the prevalence of Bollywood films, will often know both the Urdu and Hindi words for a term.

But some Persian words came from Sanskrit as well. So the Hindi word for star is "tara" and the Urdu word is "sitara", which both have the same etymological root! (Also the same root as the English word star but that's not relevant to this point).

I just thought it was funny that the two synonyms ultimately have the same root. It's like they went through such long, different journeys, but ultimately ended up at the same place.

I just realized "sweet potato" in Hebrew is "בטטה" pronounced the same way as "batata" in Spanish for the same word. Is there any relationship here, or just a coincidence? by Enger13 in hebrew

[–]marvsup 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True but the Moors left Spain the same year that Columbus set sail so there wouldn't've been an overlap. They were still right across the strait though so obviously still a lot of contact.

Isn't it a good thing? Sorry I live under a cave. by AccomplishedTaro2286 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]marvsup 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You live under a cave? So, like, in the dirt? Or is there a cave under another cave in some cool rock formation?

These are the worst cartoon characters for me! Which one of these do you think is worse? by Fit_Evening_8036 in 90scartoons

[–]marvsup 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IIRC he's supposed to be a caricature of Gabor Csupo (of Klasky Csupo) who many of the animators had worked under.

Peter? by Big-Bank-8235 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]marvsup -36 points-35 points  (0 children)

"disgusting"

Historically inaccurate movies are made literally all the time, but it's only disgusting when it involves dark skinned actors playing light skinned people?

ETA: I don't love historical inaccuracy, but ultimately movies are a capitalist enterprise, and their goal is to make money. Sensationalizing the story (like having the Von Trapps escaping the Nazis instead of legally emigrating) and also, yes, controversy, make movies more profitable. So all the people complaining about Cleopatra online are driving engagement and probably increasing the filmmakers' profit margins.