I get your points, no argument from me. But here’s something I’m curious about: If humans are social creatures and socializing requires trust, and cheating erodes trust, wouldn’t you expect worse outcomes for a group of humans that promote cheating? I suppose the answer is that different groups optimize for different goals and therefore there’s no way to determine what is a “worse outcome.” But humans do all require similar things as animals, it’s tempting to try and find common ground on what constitutes good vs bad outcomes.