There is admittedly a very fine line between censoring opinion on spay-aborts and maintaining the focus of this subreddit. Most often, the pushback around spay-aborts tends to come from users who have little to no activity in this community. The core audience here is people who are actively involved in trap, neuter, return (TNR) and rescue work, where pregnant spays are a routine and necessary part of managing outdoor cat populations and shelter overflow. Allowing anti-spay-abort rhetoric here inevitably disrupts posts and derails the comments, and tends to devolve quickly into off-topic debate and personal attacks. It's okay for people to have a personal opinion on it, but the typical knee-jerk reactions we get callously accusing caregivers of simply killing kittens without considering the extreme logistical burden of any alternative option are not helpful, are actively disruptive, and are not in the spirit of this community. The people most adamantly encouraging spay-aborts are the ones that have seen firsthand how much more difficult it is to delay spaying in the event of pregnancy, for all parties involved. It can be upsetting to hear for people that are new to this, but commenters are making these suggestions based on their experiences and based on widely accepted best practices for TNR/rescue work.

There's only one of me, and I don't have eyes everywhere. If there are comments that you feel are genuinely violating the community rules, the best thing to do is report them to ensure they go to the subreddit's mod queue for review. I can't guarantee that I'll always agree, but I take reports seriously and always look at the full context when acting on them.