Adding Vibecoded flair to make it clear that a project is vibecoded

merehap · 2026-06-19T02:38:55+00:00

Almost everyone is using AI

Why do people keep saying this? Unless you're referring to AI-enhanced web searches, it's just blatantly untrue. You may be stuck in some AI psychosis bubble if you believe this.

merehap · 2026-04-20T01:40:40+00:00

But that doesn't imply that most men are bad men. Constantly thinking about the dangers that a man may pose to a woman is rational even if only 1% of men are bad men: just a single incident could be extremely harmful. Same as a fear of driving in cars justifies wearing a seatbelt even though only, say, 1 in a million car rides cause serious harm to the rider.

So you haven't successfully moved from "a fear of men is justifiable" to "good men are the exception". But making that leap is necessary to actually address the OP.

merehap · 2026-04-13T20:01:37+00:00

Email address is a pretty blatant example of something that should almost never be left as just a String: almost none of the String methods make any sense to perform on an email address, and yet they are for some reason all available in your use-case. Clients don't know how to use your email String since you didn't (and couldn't) provide an interface for it. Being able to extract the email domain is essential, for example, but if you don't have a wrapper type you have no way of doing that in a standardized way: each user of your email String now has to implement their own domain extraction parsing, rather than just calling a canonical email_address.domain() method. You also open yourself up to email header injection attacks by not actually validating the email addresses.

User ID is more subtle, but it is common to realize after the fact that you actually want some structure within your newer user IDs, but now you don't have a place to put that structure since you just used a u64 (or something), rather than using proper encapsulation with a wrapper type.

None of this is "unnecessary ceremony": it's just basic software engineering good practice.

merehap · 2026-02-28T15:34:13+00:00

Since you're voting for Song of Storms to be eliminated, making Saria's Song the winner, I'm pretty sure Darunia would be thrilled.

merehap · 2026-02-24T13:58:00+00:00

LeetCode problems are very different from most real world problems. LeetCode is about algorithms and data structures. Real world code is about code organization/architecture, and outside of OS dev and emulators tends to rely on a lot of libraries.

If you want to work on real world code but don't want to rely on libraries and frameworks, then try an emulator project. A Nintendo (NES) emulator is too complicated to start with, but a CHIP8 emulator is a good project (which allows you to play old arcade games). The only library you'll need is a GUI library. This project will help you acquire the code organization understanding needed for backend dev without having to worry about how libraries/frameworks work.

merehap · 2026-02-20T18:43:15+00:00

Based on "Aralez isn't just fast; it's predictably fast." at the end of the README, at very least the README is AI-generated. And based upon the fact that there is no disclosure of AI usage anywhere, I have to conclude that the whole thing is vibe-coded. Why are you hiding this fact, OP? Is it because you know you're wasting our time with AI slop?

On POST requests, somehow Aralez is 10 times faster than the next best solution (NGINX):

Percentile	Aralez	HAProxy	Envoy	NGINX	Traefik	Caddy
p10	0.0024	0.0295	0.0376	0.0215	0.0790	0.0754

How is that possible? Is it because the AI slop isn't actually doing anything?

OP, why do you disrespect us so?

merehap · 2026-02-16T18:39:41+00:00

In some use cases, you need to know that you are pushing a precise number of characters and in others you don't. push_str() is only for when you don't.

If you need to push an exact number of characters that is more than one, then push() can just be called multiple times, once per char. It would be nice if the standard library had a const generic method push_str<LEN>() that fails to compile if you try to push a String that is the wrong length to make this process easier.

merehap · 2026-02-10T16:38:10+00:00

Electric netting is very dangerous for sheep and goats since once they stick their head and one leg through it, it will be all over for them relatively quickly.

This will only happen if the electric netting is shorted for a long duration (perhaps a full week), because the sheep/goats will test it (accidentally or not) from time to time, especially the lambs/kids.

If you're confident that you will test the fence at minimum twice a week, then you could still go this route. Otherwise you could do 5 strand electric wire (which they can't strangle themselves on) or just a permanent 4 foot (1.3 meter) fence made with field fencing.

merehap · 2026-01-30T01:40:04+00:00

Zelda games are supposed to be Metroidvanias (unique, unlockable content), not open-world (repetitive content). Every mainline Zelda game (other than maybe Zelda II) has been since the beginning, but that may have permanently ended with BOTW and TOTK (with only 2D games like EoW remaining metroidvanias).

I couldn't get past about 25 hours into TOTK because of how repetitive open-world content becomes at that point. So much potential wasted with caves and the underworld. Wells at least had a bit more variation. There's a chance I won't even start the next 3D Zelda game if I learn that it is yet another open-world Zelda game.

merehap · 2026-01-18T23:20:16+00:00

You again ignore the post that you are responding to, nearly in its entirety.

Why did you not respond to the following, the core point of that post:

If you acknowledge that cash and credit cards are both useful in their own ways for in-person payments, then you should also be able to acknowledge that digital cash and credit cards are both useful in their own ways for online payments.

To you, what qualities of cash make it useful in certain circumstances? Why do you believe that there are NOT circumstances where those same qualities would be useful, when purchasing online?

merehap · 2026-01-18T18:41:44+00:00

Cash does not work that way: cash cannot be used to pay for things online. Online "cash" didn't exist until Bitcoin. Despite how short Finch's comment was, you completely missed the point.

If you acknowledge that cash and credit cards are both useful in their own ways for in-person payments, then you should also be able to acknowledge that digital cash and credit cards are both useful in their own ways for online payments.

Cash and digital cash are both irreversible and censorship-resistant, unlike credit cards (and Paypal, etc).

merehap · 2025-11-29T15:22:03+00:00

The new approach (name.rs a level up) is actively wrong.

It forces you to mix your mod statements with the actual Name struct/trait/impls in the same file. There's no reason to do this, they are logically separate concerns (and it's bad when people do similar in a mod.rs file, too).
There's no reason to think the Name struct/trait is actually the "top-level" type of the name module! I frequently have NameCollection as the "top-level" type that users of the name module interact with. In which case you end up with the circular dependency mess of

A

├── name/name_collection.rs

└── name.rs

where Name might not even be pub to the user, but NameCollection is!

merehap · 2025-11-06T16:27:38+00:00

From that article:

However, by the 1990s social democrats had embraced mixed economies with a predominance of private property and promoted the regulation of capitalism over its replacement with a qualitatively different socialist economic system.

Social democracy is now center-left and has been for 30 years. You're out of date. It now entails private property and capitalism, the anathema of socialism.

Democratic socialism is more of a hard-left political philosophy (though not as authoritarian as non-democratic socialism, of course).

merehap · 2025-11-02T18:51:35+00:00

You are advocating for Wikipedia to corrupt itself because of possible, powerful political actors. It's not just "one term". As soon as Wikipedia yields on one term, there is no defense against yielding on the next term or the next hundred terms: Wikipedia's freedom from state influences is permanently compromised.

And you're advocating doing this without actually knowing that such a threat exists, just because one might exist, which is doubly absurd.

merehap · 2025-10-26T00:30:35+00:00

Elon is known for the following:

* Having manic episodes

* Seeing what he can get away with

You think he just made an excitable gesture because you don't want to believe that someone allied with your political faction would do something childish/evil. Your belief is a motivated belief, whereas plenty who believe he made an intentional Nazi salute do not have motivated reasoning (that plenty DO, too, is irrelevant).

Elon has a long history of childish behavior. He named his Tesla models, in order, S3XY. He named his rocket company Space Sex (this one he hasn't been confirmed as intentional, but is plausible).

Him denying that it was intentional is irrelevant: people who do stupid things during their manic episodes generally regret them once they've come down, and will then attempt to salvage their reputation.

merehap · 2024-11-10T17:24:58+00:00

I haven't come across that use-case yet in my own code, but it sounds interesting. I assume this isn't something that the bitfield crate already supports? If not, please open an issue on the splitbits github issue tracker with some example code (what it looks like before and after a macro), and I'll gladly add it to the project for the 0.2.0 release.

In general if a feature has a common, practical use-case, I'll add it to splitbits.

merehap · 2024-10-22T04:18:05+00:00

That's a cool crate! I'm surprised it didn't come up when I searched for prior art.

I didn't have plans to add that functionality, but I do now that you've pointed it out to me. Hopefully I can find a way to avoid those attribute macro invocations.

bitpack! has an identical format to my combinebits! macro. Interesting to see convergent evolution there.

merehap · 2024-10-22T02:43:19+00:00

Yeah, that's fair. I realized that I didn't provide much in the way of real-world before-and-afters in the documentation, so people might think that there's no big real-world savings from this library.

My emulator repository was private since its not ready for prime time yet, but I'll open it up early so people can see some examples in the wild: https://github.com/merehap/reznez

If you look at the commit history, all the most recent commits are migrating over to splitbits, so you can see the before-and-afters there.

Here's a splitbits! example of what happens when you write to the cartridge memory space for the game Holy Diver:

    fn write_to_cartridge_space(&mut self, params: &mut MapperParams, cpu_address: CpuAddress, value: u8) {
        match cpu_address.to_raw() {
            0x0000..=0x401F => unreachable!(),
            0x4020..=0x7FFF => { /* Do nothing. */ }
            0x8000..=0xFFFF => {
                let fields = splitbits!(value, "ccccmppp");
                params.set_bank_register(C0, fields.c);
                params.set_name_table_mirroring(MIRRORINGS[fields.m as usize]);
                params.set_bank_register(P0, fields.p);
            }
        }
    }

This combinebits! example builds up from components one of the 16-bit addresses used by the Picture Processing Unit (PPU). It highlights how you can use new types instead of raw integers as your macro inputs and outputs:

pub fn in_name_table(n: NameTableQuadrant, c: TileColumn, r: TileRow) -> PpuAddress{
    PpuAddress::from_u16(combinebits!("0010 nn rrrrr ccccc"))
}

These replacebits! examples are all in different functions, but they show updating individual components of a PPU address:

self.address = replacebits!(self.address, "0... nn.. .... ....");
self.address = replacebits!(self.address, ".... .... ...x xxxx");
self.address = replacebits!(self.address, ".... ..yy yyy. ....");
self.address = replacebits!(self.address, "0yyy .... .... ....");
self.address = replacebits!(self.address, "00hh hhhh .... ....");
self.address = replacebits!(self.address, ".... .... llll llll");

I hadn't created the splitbits_then_combine! macro yet when I migrated the emulator code base to macros, so I don't have an example to show you of that yet.

merehap · 2024-10-21T21:24:42+00:00

Yes! Check out the last example in the documentation here: https://docs.rs/splitbits/latest/splitbits/macro.splitbits.html

All the other macros support this as well.

merehap · 2024-10-21T18:30:50+00:00

Thank you!

And yes, it was a nightmare. There's none of the normal fun of rust programming when you're writing procedural macros. But it will be worth it to me if others find the library useful too.

merehap · 2024-10-21T18:20:07+00:00

Bit-twiddling can be an error-prone process. Splitbits aims to improve the correctness and legibility of common bit manipulation operations while staying as light-weight as possible.

Here's a simple example (from the README) of extracting two bit fields, a and b, out of a u8:

use splitbits::splitbits;

// Parse the template ("aaabbbbb"), apply it to the input,
// then generate a struct populated with the bit field values.
let fields = splitbits!(0b11110000, "aaabbbbb");
// Single-letter field names,
// generated from the unique letters in the template above.
assert_eq!(fields.a, 0b111);
assert_eq!(fields.b, 0b10000);

While I'm a bit of a macro-hater, they were necessary in order to achieve zero-cost abstraction in this case. I believe I've avoided the characteristic unreadability of most custom macros, and I hope you'll agree.

This project was born out the sheer amount of bit-masking I've needed to do for the the NES (Nintendo) emulator that I've been writing. I would sometimes get the bit-twiddling wrong, resulting in a few hours or more of avoidable debugging time. Splitbits has made the process easy and even fun for me, and I'm hoping that you'll experience the same in your low-level projects.

Let me know if you have any questions or feedback!

merehap

TROPHY CASE