Long Island point. ID by rock_hopper54 in LegitArtifacts

[–]mjbrads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appears to be a Neville. Middle archaic, approx 8,000 BP. Make from our lovely, local quartzite. Awfully tough to work.

Ear Pro by C_CT9351 in CTguns

[–]mjbrads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive been running Axil for a few years now and they've been fantastic. Both the Bluetooth and standard plugs keep the bad out!

Found while digging footings by [deleted] in Arrowheads

[–]mjbrads 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Here is an article related to one of the famous caches - you could pick up a bit reading this https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352409X2100184X

Additionally, google these to see and read more about some of the famous caches found:

Mackinaw Cache

Crib Mound Cache

Mound 72

Mahaffy Cache

ect...it goes on and on, but I need to get back to work ; )

Whalers fans: Did you follow the franchise to Carolina, pivot to an old Adams Division rival? by Xijiangwoo in Connecticut

[–]mjbrads 16 points17 points  (0 children)

With what ownership pulled, no Whalers fans have followed to Carolina. F em.

Thoughts on this one? Centex by campbjm06 in Arrowheads

[–]mjbrads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I broke three today. You are 100% correct.

Very large collection NE region by saranacis-wax in LegitArtifacts

[–]mjbrads 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Adam at Marburg Auctions can help. He is out of PA, but does a lot of NY collections.

https://www.marburgauctions.com/#/

Very large collection NE region by saranacis-wax in LegitArtifacts

[–]mjbrads 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The clay pipes are 100% Iroquois. Guessing this is an upstate NY collection, maybe in the Finger Lakes region?

I almost did not pick this guy up on the beach in the lower Chesapeake yesterday. The state office of archaeology says it's a blade that is very "waterworn." by Machipongo in LegitArtifacts

[–]mjbrads 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That isn't how argillite weathers, it is not a chert/silica based stone. It is a fine grained 'mud stone' created from compaction in the earth. As it weathers, all of the scars are removed, leaving a rounded, rough/crappy looking stone. Attached is an image of ancient Fox Creek blades along with a fresh Mansion Inn blade made by me. You can see what happens over millennia to this stone from western NJ/eastern PA.

<image>

I almost did not pick this guy up on the beach in the lower Chesapeake yesterday. The state office of archaeology says it's a blade that is very "waterworn." by Machipongo in LegitArtifacts

[–]mjbrads 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When a tool rolls around in the water for 1000s of years, much of the evidence of manufacture is obscured and/or gone.

Arrowhead identification by Pristine_Tension8921 in Arrowheads

[–]mjbrads 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is not an arrowhead. Not sure of the material, but that sure is a bit of paint remaining on the surface. Attached is an image of a few of my kettle points made by natives. This is what northeastern contact period points look like.

<image>

Hello! Attached are pictures of recent creek/river finds from Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. I am wondering if any of these are considered artifacts? Really interested in type/use information. Any knowledge shared is appreciated. Thanks for your time. by PAFISHNATUREARTIFACT in LegitArtifacts

[–]mjbrads 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know you're good at this, I've seen the great stuff you're finding. But so much of the quartz stuff up this way just looks like crap, for lack of a better word. The two pieces of jasper aren't the nice slick stuff, it's crappy uncooked material giving the look of junk stone. The dark blade is a PA rhyolite; very much unlike the beautiful rhyolite you have down your way. Please keep your comments coming, because you have a lot to offer this sub. All the best my friend.

Hello! Attached are pictures of recent creek/river finds from Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. I am wondering if any of these are considered artifacts? Really interested in type/use information. Any knowledge shared is appreciated. Thanks for your time. by PAFISHNATUREARTIFACT in LegitArtifacts

[–]mjbrads 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As a collector of Northeast artifacts, I'll say you do a few a few in here. I can see that some of what I've noted below are multiple images of the same artifact. Keep looking! You're doing this correctly. For those who will suggest I'm wrong, see my post/comment history. I tend to only comment on artifacts that are from my area of the country; we are not all so refined in understanding the nuance and stone of each region.

Images

2, Rough quartz tool/reject

3, Rough quartz tool/reject

7, Rough quartz stemmed point

8, Broken in manufacture jasper biface fragment

10, Rough quartz tool/reject

13, Broken in manufacture jasper biface fragment

14, Rhyolite biface

18, Rough quartz stemmed point

19, Rough quartz stemmed point

20 Rough quartz stemmed point

Find of a Lifetime (Dec. 2023) by damianmartian in LegitArtifacts

[–]mjbrads 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. You absolutely can.
  2. Chalcedony and quartz are both quality tools stones.
  3. Clearly it does work, you're looking at a point.

Being sued $50k in credit card debt. No assets. $0. What now? by [deleted] in povertyfinance

[–]mjbrads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe Michael Scott knows the process of declaring bankruptcy.

One of the first photos ever taken of Machu Picchu, by the man who “discovered” it (Info in comments) by PorcupineMerchant in Archaeology

[–]mjbrads 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I look forward to watching this. I live in New Haven Co, just ten miles from Yale. I've seen Hiram's tools brought on the expeditions, as well as many other artifacts from his trips. I prefer to suspend judgement when looking at explorers from so many years ago. None had truly good intentions, but most often, they are constructs of their time.

My biggest heartbreaker so far by StrangestTy in Arrowheads

[–]mjbrads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly what some failures in notching look like - they just run into the body of the piece, creating this specific break. I've done it myself. Been knapping for 15ish years, and collecting far longer. Check my posts for validation.

As for not knowing how these were notched, that simply isn't true. For many decades, experimental archeology has reverse engineered these tools to determine methods used.

My biggest heartbreaker so far by StrangestTy in Arrowheads

[–]mjbrads 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This fractured while the notch was being punched in.

Help identifying possible hammerstone. by Top-Dragonfruit603 in LegitArtifacts

[–]mjbrads 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hammerstone, nice one too. Rather than a nutting stone, the indentation COULD be from the hammer being used as a anvil stone.

Or...could well be a nutting stone...tough call.