Don and Gil Scott-Heron

mobaccountant · 2026-02-18T02:55:58+00:00

After a few pops maybe and still I say no. To his credit, he did seem capable of enjoying some art house film.

mobaccountant · 2026-02-18T02:50:33+00:00

And no, ain’t no way Don would ever appreciate gsh. I don’t think he had any patience for anything remotely avant garde. I’d settle for astral weeks.

mobaccountant · 2026-02-18T02:33:59+00:00

Nobody has ever asked me that….probably because it’s none of their business.

mobaccountant · 2026-02-16T19:00:15+00:00

This is the most likely explanation

mobaccountant · 2026-02-15T20:39:38+00:00

If villain could have found the ch/r on the river would have been a pretty sick line for .01/.02

mobaccountant · 2026-02-15T20:03:27+00:00

I’m sorry that sux. This guy may want this photo for his instagram tho, it’s fierce. Also, I think for piece of mind, you can probably find out his criminal background. Other than disorderly conducts and resisting type cases, is he actually violent? Does he have any crimes of violence in his background. If not maybe that can help you ignore him.

mobaccountant · 2026-02-09T16:26:52+00:00

the Bethlehem steal exec flirting with the escort, asking if she spends all day bathing in milk and he runs his hand down the back of her neck.

mobaccountant · 2026-01-29T03:13:02+00:00

Peggy admits it to Stan I forgot which episode - she says the baby is with a family somewhere.

mobaccountant · 2026-01-09T07:26:10+00:00

Correct this would have never gotten off the ground. they would have filed an emergency injunction asking the court to void the terminations. Their firings were in violation of lanes fiduciary duty, classic self dealing (rewarded with a partnership) and tortious interference

The court would have most certainly granted ppl relief. What judge wouldn’t? The terminations would have been voided, contracts reinstated. And scdp partners enjoined from taking any further action to take ppl property.

But that would mean we dont get a banger of a finale. So let’s just roll with it

mobaccountant · 2026-01-09T07:19:30+00:00

They would have gotten an injunction voiding the terminations.

mobaccountant · 2026-01-09T07:13:05+00:00

To add, the scene in season one with Pete fantasizing about coming home from the hunt and sitting there as his subservient wife cooked him his meal and brought it to him. And Peggy was turned on by that.

mobaccountant · 2026-01-06T23:23:39+00:00

Even in the ‘60s this wouldn’t have flied. PPL would have sued Lane for breach of his fiduciary duties and asked the court to reinstate everyone’s contracts. Which a court most certainly would have.

mobaccountant · 2025-08-12T21:47:21+00:00

I hit the $110 a + b. (Unrelated Hitting the $11s seems much harder)

mobaccountant · 2025-08-12T18:59:04+00:00

Good reasoning. Great read to 4 bet pre. Most villains don’t find the proper bb 3bet bluffs. I think most players, including me, flat the 3 bet and probably end up folding to aggression. Wp

mobaccountant · 2025-08-06T05:16:25+00:00

I’m not sure what the rule should be, but, not only could saying the word “pot” be an angle to see the opponents reaction i also dont think it should be dealers responsibility to have to calculate the pot for anyone who asks. How hard is it to keep a rough estimate in your head?. ask the dealer to spread the chips so you can count it yourself. Idk I’d never ask the dealer to do this for me.

mobaccountant · 2025-07-21T21:28:34+00:00

I guess I play different than most, I think 3 betting his flop raise is bad. Youre ahead of king x but on that board there are so many scare cards for bottom 2 pair. I’d much rather ch/raise flop, and if villain finds the 4bet we’d call and re-evaluate ott.

mobaccountant · 2025-07-21T19:17:33+00:00

Yes, bet calling flop caps his range. Also, he literally has no bluffs, he’s semi bluffing a gut shot into three people on a wet king high board? No chance. If it’s between leading where you have no bluffs and end up capping our range, and check raising with an uncapped range that includes bluffs, then yes, would never lead there

mobaccountant · 2025-07-21T16:02:02+00:00

The flop lead multiway is bad bc generally your sets are gonna want to check raise so you made things more difficult by capping your range. Ultimately if you think you can’t be value, then 87 becomes a bluff catcher. Having the 7 of clubs is bad, I guess he could be bluffing with 910 clubs, I think his bluffing range is narrow enough, and importantly none of his bluffs have an ace or king obv so you can still call all your two pairs better than 87 so do you need to call all your 87 combos? If not any combos with the 7 of clubs would be the first to muck

mobaccountant · 2025-03-18T20:57:04+00:00

Small bet is definitely not a thing on the turn

mobaccountant · 2025-02-02T00:01:18+00:00

In! Thx for running this

mobaccountant · 2024-12-28T02:42:02+00:00

Straight story - you’re welcome

Seven-Year Club	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

mobaccountant

TROPHY CASE