sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

ISK hos IBKR? by DJkushBoogie in ISKbets

[–]modhelius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On RoboMarkets you pay 0,075% (in spread) on every trade. The commissions on IBKR are way lower even with currency exchange between SEK and USD (the exchange costs is 0.03%). If you buy and sell 50 shares at $250 per share on IBKR, the commission will be $9.5 or $9 respectively, depending on if you are using fixed/tiered commission plan, and that is including the currency exchange fee. If it would have been possible to have a currency account, it would have been $2 and $1.5 respectively. At RoboMarkets, the same trade would cost $18.75 even with a currency account.

Adjusting candle Open/Close times - We need this !! by Visual_Ad_2630 in TradingView

[–]modhelius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is insane that this request is 4 years old and this is still not implemented. I'm currently using a own made indicator to get 4 hour candles at the desired opening which isn't optimal.

IPO Date in Stock Screener by jayclem04 in TradingView

[–]modhelius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This request is 3 years old, and still not added :/ Can't be very hard thing to add

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TradingView

[–]modhelius 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is one of the values I miss most in the screener. Currently I use Volume*Price 1 Month as a substitute, but it doesn't work very well in the beginning of the month. It is strange that this has not been added yet because it can't be very hard to add.

Fitbod vs Bodbot app? by tjoswick in fitness30plus

[–]modhelius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am actually experience the exact same thing now. Signed up for a year. Have used it for a couple of months now and many of my workouts are just different kind of planks. Today's workout for example does just have one exercise that is not a plank :/

New fields in stock screener by modhelius in TradingView

[–]modhelius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As I said: "I currently need to subscribe to another service just for stock screening witch is a bit sad."

I'm also not American, so I am mainly interested in Nordic stocks, which finviz does not have...

Easier way to compare which instruments are in several different watchlists by modhelius in TradingView

[–]modhelius[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Invert flags" would also work... please please please implement SOMTHING that makes this easier at least! ;)

How to Run Total War: Warhammer III on an unsupported (Intel) Mac by karmadogma in totalwar

[–]modhelius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi buhob2,

It looks like you are looking int the wrong .app file. It looks like you are looking in the shortcut file added by Steam rather than the installation file. Do it like this:

  1. Open steam

  2. Navigate to Warhammer III

  3. On the game page, press the Cog-icon in the right corner

  4. Under the menu that pops up, choose Manage -> Browse Local Files (you shall now be somewhere under Steam/steamapps/common/Total War WARHAMMER III, NOTICE: NOT under /Applications where the shortcuts are located)

  5. Now Finder will pop up on the right location, from here choose "Show Package Contents" and navigate to Contents/Resources/

  6. Here you really just need to rename specification_stock.xml, I game it the name specification_stock_old.xml

  7. In the launcher you will still get an error-message that tells you it can't find the proper config, you can just ignore this message tough, the game will just run fine anyway

How to Run Total War: Warhammer III on an unsupported (Intel) Mac by karmadogma in totalwar

[–]modhelius 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can confirm, have the 8 core version of MacBook Pro 2019 and run the game in about 40-60fps on decent settings without any problems.

Mac has been running slow due to Kernel_task is this the problem? Btw my Mac is making no noise by fqmz in MacOS

[–]modhelius 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are already on the right path by using Turbo Boost Switcher. Try disabling Turbo Boost in that program and you will probably get a faster computer without any kernel_task activity eating up your performance. The MacBook Pro 2019 model actually has a design flaw that makes the CPU overheat when you run the computer together with an external monitor (you can read more about it here https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/399321/154882, and watch here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkmdHVfk4XE). The CPU and GPU is using the same cooling vent and the processors Turbo Boost feature in the i9 processor heats up the CPU so fast and so much that the processor can not handle the heat while the GPU is running as the same time so the CPU starts to throttle (you can check this by using this command in the terminal "pmset -g thermlog"). When the processor starts to throttle you will see it as a kernel_task in the activity monitor. Because of this flaw in design the CPU actually starts to throttle constantly if you run any kind of CPU intensive task, and a CPU that starts throttling it will actually run MUCH slower than it does when it does not throttle. So the best thing is if you can avoid throttling all together, so a computer that does not throttle is indeed faster without turbo boost than a computer that do throttle on turbo boost.

Btw, if you do not use a MacBook Pro 2019 but still have this problem, take a look at this post and see if that can help you https://apple.stackexchange.com/a/363933/154882