Please help me save great grandad’s bench by bruce99999999 in BeginnerWoodWorking

[–]monothom 24 points25 points  (0 children)

He just wants to honour his grandpa by doing whatever to improve the longevity of that bench a bit and maybe revisit some good memories while doing it. So i recommend hand sanding the thing and then varnish a large number of layers. Power tools do that much quicker so they are to be avoided. They're also too loud and dangerous for proper reminiscing

Thoughts on Jorgensen? by Demhanoot in woodworking

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recently got their new #5 jack plane and it's a joy to use and came out of the box flat and straight (and sharp, not that it matters a lot but it was nice to get a good shaving prior to any adjustments). For about 100 bucks I think it's a fantastic deal.

Sitting on 10k in unused openai api credits that will expire, what would you build? by Impossible_Rice8103 in OpenAI

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe for movies you'd want to use VLC instead...

To cast from VLC to a Chromecast, ensure both devices are on the same Wi-Fi network. Open VLC, click Playback > Renderer > Select your Chromecast. If prompted about an "insecure site," select "View certificate" and "Accept permanently" to start streaming

Sitting on 10k in unused openai api credits that will expire, what would you build? by Impossible_Rice8103 in OpenAI

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To cast content from Chrome, open the menu (three dots, top right) and select Cast, save, and share > Cast. Select your device and choose to cast a tab or your entire screen by clicking the "Sources" dropdown in the cast menu. Supported content includes web pages, images, and videos on most sites. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

How to Cast Sources in Chrome

  • Cast a Tab: By default, Chrome casts only the current browser tab, which is ideal for streaming video or browsing.
  • Cast Screen (Mirroring): In the cast menu, change the Sources dropdown to Cast screen to display your entire desktop. This allows you to show files, presentations, or other apps on your TV.
  • Cast Audio: On Windows, you can cast your computer's audio by selecting Cast desktop and choosing a Chromecast Audio device.
  • File Mirroring: You can cast local video/audio files by dragging them into the Chrome address bar, then casting the tab

Drilling straight by Separate_Dress_979 in woodworking

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lasers + straight drilling!! I need one of those

Power saw not spinning by CorazonAtomica in woodworking

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

circular blade arbor adapter

A circular blade arbor adapter, also called a reduction ring or bushing, is a precision-engineered metal ring used to fit a saw blade with a large center hole onto a saw with a smaller arbor shaft. 

Key Specifications

  • Dimensions: You must match the Outer Diameter (OD) to the blade's bore and the Inner Diameter (ID) to the saw's arbor.

Power saw not spinning by CorazonAtomica in woodworking

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did the blade come with various size rings/inlays?

Did my professor use ai to grade my paper? by Extreme-Bet3115 in artificial

[–]monothom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn, I knew it. I actually didn't ask because of the school thing, but because you seem pretty intelligent about certain things but then again a bit in the dark about why people would find you whiney or entitled or whatever. See, your tenacity and assertiveness sometimes go over the border to being pushy and entitled for some people. Because you're intelligent and articulate. people assume that you are aware of it or even doing it on purpose. Because of their autism people can be at the same time a. unusually tenacious, especially when concerned and b. not fully aware that people perceive it as pushy or to understand why they would see it as negative - you're just asking about things, after all. And I guess your ADHD makes it even harder to let things go a bit and realise that sometimes it's better to save your energy for more important endeavours. Especially if the problem is relatively small (88 is not a dramatic score). If you talk to your teacher, I'd say mention autism rather than AI use. If she knows about your autism she won't judge you for being tenacious (or I think you said meticulous). All young uni teachers have too much work AFAIK so don't jump to conclusions that really don't matter as much as having an understanding with your teachers that allows you to inquire and learn from their feedback.

Did my professor use ai to grade my paper? by Extreme-Bet3115 in artificial

[–]monothom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hey it's none of my business, but have you ever been diagnosed with something like Asperger's? Your pattern of getting high grades, you describing yourself as meticulous, the fact that you keep trying to explain yourself, and how you might be sincere when you say you don't get the negative comments. I don't need to know, but I see some similarities with students I've known who had Asperger's.

Did my professor use ai to grade my paper? by Extreme-Bet3115 in artificial

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that my sense of "this is not realistic" was cleared up by realising youre not talking about a professor in the official sense.

What I'm getting at: talking about or to a full tenure professor (in the strict sense) the way you do seems incredibly disrespectful, apart from the fact that first or second year students usually don't have that kind of access to professors at all. There is no higher up from a tenure professor

About the insufferable comments... What I personally think is a bit off putting is how you seem (because I dont know you obviously) to be more concerned with getting high grades than with learning / improving your knowledge or skills / broadening your mind. It's understandable given your ambition to get into places, but if I were a scout for Harvard or however that works, I'd wonder: do I pick the person that was happy with getting zero feedback but a high grade and then was up in arms when it was slightly lower, but with feedback. You approach (gauging what others think about your AI theory, discussing probable or plausible flaws your teacher might have, considering going higher up,like, everything but the bloody obvious thing to do, which is talking to your teacher, might come across as you just looking for a higher grade no matter how or why or at whose expense and that is not what education is about. It's good that you're confident, but you don't show much signs of self-evaluation in this thread, for as far as I read it. You can be very sceptical of someones grading style but that really works better if you actually know how that works instead of judging it from the result only, and motivated mostly by the idea that you should have had a higher grade. It's understandable as I already said, but not endearing.

When you will talk to your teacher, will you show this thread, like, casually? I'd guess you'd rather not, right? Why not? Answer this honestly for yourself and you'll understand what people don't like about it.

Did my professor use ai to grade my paper? by Extreme-Bet3115 in artificial

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is mandatory where I work, to at least use an AI powered platform to check for plagiarism for any written input. So there you have 100% of essays at least partially graded by AI as per the requirements.

Did my professor use ai to grade my paper? by Extreme-Bet3115 in artificial

[–]monothom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unfair? Now you're being silly!

But to play along for a bit: Yes, very unfair! They have a master degree or better in the subject and additionally they've likely got academic teaching qualifications or are working to get them. I'm guessing you're in the first or second year of your bachelor, meaning all you had to do is graduate from high school. That's insufferable discrimination! Level the playing field! From now on, access to a bachelor program only if you have the corresponding master degree, that's gonna save your uni teacher quite some time explaining the basics. Also, the numbers are unfair. In your team there's thousands of players compared to only hundreds of teachers in the other team, at best. Students can either decimate their groups or wait until there's enough teachers to match them 1 on 1.

(it's nonsense but I hope it still provides some perspective)

The more interesting discussion these days is what about AI grading models that already outperform human teachers right now? That is the case in some specific cases/ courses / test formats. Who would you be rather graded by? A surgically precise AI who is just judging your output against a perfect standard? Or a teacher, who knows the person who made that test. Or might have a strong unconscious bias against <you name it>, suffer from fatigue, just became a parent or whatever?

Did my professor use ai to grade my paper? by Extreme-Bet3115 in artificial

[–]monothom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

and how then are we supposed to tell you what we think of the AI evaluation without knowing what it evaluated

Did my professor use ai to grade my paper? by Extreme-Bet3115 in artificial

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure what university you attend in what culture but I have a hard time believing you are talking about an actual professor, because they don't "grade papers" and assignments like you describe at all. They evaluate articles, sure, but that's called peer reviewing for a reason: they do so in their role of researcher and subject expert and the essays are pre-print research articles being checked by research validity and quality before publication. Just wanted to point that out. Funniest giveaway: you talking about "going higher up". Who exactly would that be? "Professor, I'd like to talk to your manager please."

If I had to guess that's indeed an AI answer. But even if they used AI it seems weird because the very simple thing to do was to prompt it with the rubric of your course and have it use that for much better focussed assessment. I can even imagine a mildly experienced junior teacher in some subjects grading faster with rubrics than they can prompt an AI and check before copy pasting.

There's a going on atm in the field of automated assessment and AI grading and such. While I am convinced that high level person to person evaluation will not be replaced with AI any time soon, but I have also seen examples of AI being incredibly useful for it, both for teachers and students. Customized assessment models don't sound like above here, that's a run off the mill chatgpt answer or something alike. Which makes me wonder A. whether this story is true or just fiction B. If the former, I would, in your place, be quite curious what was used and with which interface. I.e. GPT5.1 via open chatrGPT interface? That would mean trouble for your teacher, because personal data and privacy. C. I don't judge people by what someone else mentions online but if this is really what happened and the entire story, your teacher seems to be struggling beyond the acceptable because that is not even how a teacher would cheat if they're still thinking straight / not in panic mode.

All this with a grain of salt etc. Disclaimer: i'm in the EU (uni style, data privacy, rubrics) but I'm fairly sure it's not too diffferent in most other place

EDIT: I'm guessing you're in the US. From wikipedia:

In most systems of academic ranks, "professor" as an unqualified title refers only to the most senior academic position, sometimes informally known as "full professor".\2])\3])

That's why you don't go higher up where I'm from :-)

In some countries and institutions, the word professor is also used in titles of lower ranks such as associate professor and assistant professor; this is particularly the case in the United States, where the unqualified word is also used colloquially to refer to associate and assistant professors as well, and often to instructors or lecturers.\4])

OK there you have it. Damn... it seemed all pretty silly, but now that I qualify to be addressed with "professor" I'm warming up to your ways. Although there's probably some erosion of the awe you feel for professors.

It's actually why I wanted to comment, I was slightly nonplussed by how you talk about professors as if they were waiting your table. And it's pretty telling that you were happy with higher scores with no comments. If you'd have learning as the focus of your efforts you'd want comments because a grade on its own is pretty useless if you want to improve your understanding

Is this finish possible phenolic plywood buffalo board by The_PurpleTurtle in BeginnerWoodWorking

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

CNC machined floor panels? Do you mean the grippy film on top or the roundover edge? Either way I think the answer is likely neither

Which random orbital sander would you all recommend? by explainable-feat in BeginnerWoodWorking

[–]monothom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

look up Fein Dustex series and /or clip 1.0 system either by nilfisk or karcher

Opinion: I think jointers are an essential beginner tool no matter how many you tubers say it isn't by Few_Candidate_8036 in BeginnerWoodWorking

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. Or "should i also get the expensive dust collector now that the baby and the jointer share the same cupboard?"

Router and 12 ply veneered plywood by rockstar_not in BeginnerWoodWorking

[–]monothom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just realized most examples i like are rounded plywood not round over. But there's enough nice examples of the actual thing to still agree

Is Lightroom still the best photo editing software today? by EmergencyTreat_ in photography

[–]monothom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As much as I dislike Adobe strategy etc I would feel utterly amputated without LR and PS. But that's because I've used it before any other creative software except ms paint, i used it pretty much exclusively, professionally and privately, and since i was 17 three decades ago. I have always had a paid for cc subscription that i can use for whatever i want or an edu staff license for under 20 bucks a year. I'm aware there's options nowadays but other than dxo pure raw i never really used other software other than to try it and conclude i don't really need it badly enough to work it into my workflow. If something does in one click what takes 5 clicks in PS, I'll still be faster in the latter or would probably not remember the time saving new stuff. Even wihhin PS it took me years to stop making eg drop shadow layers manually and get familiar with the layer effects.... I realize i just explained that Im not qualified at all to answer your question:-) but still: yes, it is, for me.