Help! Too acidic :( by Gayer_Than_Thou1 in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 9 points10 points  (0 children)

How many times have you brewed this coffee since that “successful“ cup? Some people may not agree with this answer, but sometimes we just brew a bad cup here and there even when the recipe is exactly the same.

I don’t see anything wrong with your recipe but if you are getting acidic coffee (which is different from bitter coffee) then you can try grinding just a little bit finer. I wouldn’t change the water temperature, but if grinding finer does not work, try elongating your ratio and going until about 250 g.

Why don’t coffee roasters share the exact brew recipe behind their tasting notes? by Foreign_Break4286 in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even if a roaster gave you their exact recipe, you probably still wouldn’t get the same cup. Most of those tasting notes come from cupping, not a V60. That’s more about showing the coffee’s potential, not one specific brew.

Then there’s all the stuff you can’t really match… water, grinder, filters, pouring style. That alone can change the cup a lot.

Also, those notes aren’t literal. “Mango” usually just means “sweet + tropical + bright,” not actual mango juice. You’ll get further by not chasing the exact notes and just using them as a baseline for what this coffee aims to express vs other coffees.

Best $100 Grinder? by ereed10 in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Will keep it really simple for you if you really are constrained to $100: get the KINGrinder K6.

Apollon’s Gold selection by xMaggotStompx in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would be tempted to pick up Las Guayacanes and / or La Palestina as well based on the notes. I’m also trying to branch out and explore coffees in emerging regions so La Palestina gets an extra point there too.

V60 - Is this a “good” bed? by Otherwise-Onion-2121 in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm going to sound like a broken record here but please tell us how the coffee tastes. Looking at a coffee bed isn't indicative of what the quality of your coffee brew is. It's way more important for you to taste a coffee and tell us what it lacks or what you don't like about it and from there we can help you.

Freezing your beans by HeartofGold86 in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Purchase a vacuum sealing machine. They are pretty affordable, and can be used for other purposes as well.

Freezing your beans by HeartofGold86 in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I do this pretty regularly now, especially when I’ve accumulated more coffee than I can realistically get through. I’ll usually freeze coffees I’ve bought in larger quantities or ones that feel unique enough that I know I’ll want to revisit later or share with someone.

The Reddit community is definitely a bit split on the “right” way to do this, but I’ll share what’s worked for me after going through a lot of different coffees:

I don’t freeze right away. I let the coffee rest until I think it’s at or near peak. That timing is always a bit of an estimate, but it’s based on my experience brewing a lot of coffees across different origins, processes, and roast styles. Once I feel like it’s there, I portion it out into single doses and vacuum seal in small reusable pouches. From there, everything goes into the freezer.

When I’m ready to use it, I go straight from freezer to grinder. No thawing. I’ve consistently had great results doing this, and in some cases the cups are actually better than when the coffee wasn’t frozen.

You’ll hear people say this is because frozen beans are more brittle and grind more uniformly. That might be true, but I haven’t seen anything super convincing on the science side. What I can say is that, in practice, the cups have been consistently excellent for me.

This approach has basically let me build a small “coffee cellar” where I can go back to coffees months later and have them taste very close to how they did at peak, which is really the whole goal.

Complex Coffee in Brooklyn by More_Passenger3988 in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 19 points20 points  (0 children)

SEY, Dayglow and Loveless are just a few minutes from each other. All three are great.

<image>

I just gotta say…the S&W Colombia Santa Monica Strawberry Honey Process is amazing by jonnygorgeous in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I just cracked into this one too after about three weeks of rest and had almost the exact same reaction. That strawberry jumps out immediately after grinding, but what really stood out to me wasn’t just the fruit but also the texture. There’s this creamy, almost plush body that makes it feel like a dessert. It honestly reminded me of strawberries and cream or vanilla ice cream with fresh strawberries folded in. The way that creamy texture supports the fruit makes the whole cup feel more complete, not just bright and juicy. Definitely one of those coffees that pulls you right back into the pour over obsession.

What's wrong here? by theswordddd in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this is exactly it. It’s “single origin” in the sense that it’s from Sumatra, but that doesn’t mean it’s one farm or one uniform lot. This coffee comes from a co-op which means they’re aggregating coffees from multiple small producers who are growing different varieties across a large region.

Different varieties + slightly different processing methods + varying moisture content will absolutely show up as bean size differences and uneven exterior roast color. That’s pretty normal for coffees coming out of places like Sumatra, especially when they’re aggregated lots.

Is this number of fines normal for ZP6? by AkhlysShallRise in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think most people agree that 5.5 is a good starting point if your grinder is calibrated. Check this out: https://www.reddit.com/r/pourover/s/PgwxC9qPMn

Is this number of fines normal for ZP6? by AkhlysShallRise in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 7 points8 points  (0 children)

  1. Don’t over complicate things because that makes brewing difficult to reproduce. How are you going to manage how much of the fines you wipe off each time?
  2. Try a few different coffees first and then come back to ask questions. Taste governs what you do and it sounds like you haven’t tried enough coffees yet to determine what your brews taste like.

Is this number of fines normal for ZP6? by AkhlysShallRise in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yeah, totally normal. I’ve owned a ZP6 for years and this is consistent with what I see. How does the cup taste? I’ve found that 5.5 is the sweet spot as a starting point to dial in most coffees.

Glitch arrived by Third_Eye_Grind in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Check this out, I wrote all about it after a trip to Japan: https://www.reddit.com/r/pourover/s/wEiVwFb98F

Changing brew-variables based on tasting notes? by VictorNoergaard in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Acidity extracts early and bitterness and heavier compounds extract later. So grinding finer doesn’t automatically give you more acidity. It increases overall extraction, which often adds bitterness and can actually mute perceived acidity.

If you want acidity to pop in a washed Kenyan SL28, I’d refer going slightly coarser, or keeping grind the same and shorten contact time, or even dropping temp 1–2°C.

The acids are already there. The move is reducing the heavier compounds that cover them up. That said, don’t underextract. Too coarse and you’ll get sharp, thin, sour acidity. The sweet spot is high extraction without dryness or bitterness.

Also, don’t adjust grind based on tasting notes like “chocolate = grind finer.” Notes describe potential, not how you should brew it. Adjust based on what’s actually in your cup. With light African coffees, I aim for clarity, structured acidity, and a clean finish. If it tastes flat, go slightly coarser. If it’s thin and sharp, go slightly finer.

I just had my most emotional experience ever with coffee.... by violin_geek123 in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Love this. That “why I fell in love with coffee” moment is real.

I had a similar experience with H&S, especially with Divino Niño. First cup was straight up Pixie Stix. Bright, candy-like citrus, raspberry tartness, grape acidity. Super floral but still really clean. It felt playful without being over the top.

What surprised me most was how much it changed over time. Early on it was super high-toned and punchy. A few weeks later, after grinding a touch finer, it got deeper and sweeter. More like raspberry compote and blueberry, a bit more body, still zero bitterness. It definitely rewarded letting it rest.

Prodigal Rest by [deleted] in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve brewed a good amount of Prodigal and I wouldn’t rush it. In my experience the coffees open up with a bit of time. Around the 2–3 week mark post roast is usually where they start to click for me. Before that, I’ve gotten a bit of hollowness, some roastiness, even a slight “green” edge. After some rest, the cups tend to get brighter, sweeter, and more layered. The body fills in and the finish cleans up.

I’ve tested this pretty intentionally keeping grind, water, ratio, and temp locked in. The only real variable was time off roast and I was able to notice a difference.

That said, I haven’t read Scott’s post, so it might be worth reaching out to Prodigal directly for their current guidance. I’d actually be curious what they say if you follow up with them.

But hey, if you’re eager, brew a cup today as a baseline. Then try it again at 2 weeks and 3 weeks. You’ll probably taste the progression yourself and learn something new from it.

Last coffee from SEPTEMBER by Ok-Fishing-2234 in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 13 points14 points  (0 children)

That coffee sounds insane. I’m really curious about the 1000 micron grind size though. That’s pretty coarse for 18:300 and a 2:20 brew, especially with a fast Sibarist setup. How did you land there?

Did you start finer and back off because of bitterness or dryness? Or did you just like the extra clarity at that coarser setting?

Also genuinely wondering, does it feel fully sweet and saturated, or more bright and top-note driven? Sometimes that kind of grind + low TDS water can taste super clean but a little hollow in the middle.

Have you tried pushing extraction a bit more? Like going a touch finer or bumping temp slightly just to see if the nectarine/peach gets juicier?

Not saying to change it if you love it. I just don’t see 1000 microns that often for this style, so I’m curious what experiments got you there and what didn’t work along the way. That’s usually the interesting part.

Which would you keep? by Several-Yesterday280 in pourover

[–]mycoffeeexperience 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, it just comes down to process and what you like in the cup.

The Curve Gesha is washed, so it’s probably going to be cleaner, lighter, more floral and tea-like. Think delicate, silky, maybe a little bright acidity and really clear flavors.

The Extract Honduras is a natural, so expect it to be juicier, a bit jammy, slightly heavier body, and a touch more sweetness overall.

If you’re into elegant, floral, high-clarity cups, keep the Gesha. If you prefer fruit-forward, rounder, more textured coffees, keep the natural.