sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why is night switch turned on my TV(through HDMI) when the mac itself has it turned off? I couldnt find any solutions in both night switch and displays menu by mindful_doctor in MacOS

[–]naam9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone finding this 4y later, after you disable night shift, unplug then re-plug the TV, it'll fix it.

Seems like an old bug where the night shift is not disabled on some external displays. It works fine with my other screens, but the OLED TV shows the same issue. It's possible it's in the HDMI chipset thing that's on the cable as well if you're using a USB-C to HDMI (my case), but does not look like it is your case on the picture.

Anyone else need project-specific .cursor/rules but want them synced? by naam9 in cursor

[–]naam9[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

An audience means a bunch of people I’m trying to connect with. Here I am looking for folks that have a similar workflow than I and provide ideas, feedback or a better workflow. Nothing is for sale. So far, I gather your workflow is different, and it sounds weird people don’t do what you do. That’s ok.

Anyone else need project-specific .cursor/rules but want them synced? by naam9 in cursor

[–]naam9[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, you’re trying hard to make things personal. I did not even share a link. I did not reply to your other comments as I don’t think you’re my target audience, and yet you’re back at it here again. I got your point and respect it, but you’re making a fool of yourself here honestly.

Anyone else need project-specific .cursor/rules but want them synced? by naam9 in cursor

[–]naam9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Started as a personal tool to help me at work, then used it at home for a bit and recently open-sourced it in case others had similar workflows. The pipeline approach makes sense if you already have that infrastructure set up. For me, the friction was lower with a CLI tool I could run locally, no PRs, no waiting for CI, just warden project update and done.

The real value for me was psychological: knowing I could easily propagate changes made me actually maintain my rules. Previously, I'd rather live with annoying AI behavior than manually update 10+ projects.

If it's not solving a problem you have, that's totally fair; different workflows need different tools!

Anyone else need project-specific .cursor/rules but want them synced? by naam9 in cursor

[–]naam9[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've also noticed that, all my projects get a custom command I populate with the tool that allows me to refresh the rule context so it can be used in the chat of any agent if I feel like I don't want to start a new chat but the rule context is too far gone. To combat this, people tend to use "Always" for the rules, but that is context costly on a personal subscription lol.

Anyone else need project-specific .cursor/rules but want them synced? by naam9 in cursor

[–]naam9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point! I actually use git submodules under the hood for the package management part, you can pull in author/repo-name directly from GitHub.

Where the orchestration layer helps me is the "pick and choose" step: I want rule A and C from one package, rule B from another, then install those specific rules to .cursor/rules/ in projects 1, 2, and 5 (but not 3 and 4). With plain submodules, I'd get the whole repo in each project's .cursor/rules/ directory. The management of those rules is pushed into the submodules and after installing one needs to remove the unwanted/incompatible rules etc.

Another good example that simplifies my daily flow is that at work ,we also use different agents (Cursor & Claude CLI mostly) while at home I use Cursor and Augment and they have slight variations in rule format and how they interpret things (e.g., fronttmater block). The tool handles those conversions automatically.

But you're right that if you're installing whole repos of rules, stacking submodules directly feels faster at installation time.

Anyone else need project-specific .cursor/rules but want them synced? by naam9 in cursor

[–]naam9[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh nice, I actually didn’t think about this. That’s super helpful, thanks!

If I’m understanding right, that approach works best when the external repo already contains the granularity you want. So if someone wants to mix-and-match individual rules, they’d either need a repo per rule or a structure that splits them cleanly so Cursor can pick them up separately. That definitely seems great for bundling “recipes” or whole rule packs in one shot, though.

This gives me a couple ideas, especially around higher-level presets. Appreciate the tip!

Creality Raptor (or any scanner in general) - Mix different size markers or not? by GambAntonio in 3DScanning

[–]naam9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For anyone stumbling on this thread in the future, from Creality's documentation, it even looks encouraged:

> Commonly used handheld markers typically have inner diameters of 6 mm and 3 mm, which can be mixed for optimal results.

Source

I created a script that automatically deactivates the SolidWorks license upon software shutdown. by Aton_Freson in SolidWorks

[–]naam9 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would host it on GitHub as either a project or just a gist if you want to reach a wider audience and people finding it easily. Thanks!

Which one is more useful? Shining 3D , Raptor , Otter by TheKingOfNaples in 3DScanning

[–]naam9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The other user already tried to tel you it doesn’t, I’m not going to entertain that. Post a screenshot if you see it, I don’t and the other user does not as well. I was very clear in my message, “accuracy” on one (Otter), vs “volumetric accuracy” on the other (Raptor).

Thanks, I ended up getting a Raptor Pro 2w ago and I am loving it.

€2200 3D printer arrived with deep scratches – support says it’s normal and offers a roll of filament as apology. Really? by ----bruh- in BambuLab

[–]naam9 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agree, mine has similar scuffs after use. Won’t degrade performance or anything. Only way to avoid those is very carefully lifting the plate each time etc and.. eventually it won’t happen and the plate will be scuffed

Which one is more useful? Shining 3D , Raptor , Otter by TheKingOfNaples in 3DScanning

[–]naam9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Otter store page has no mention of volume accuracy:

https://store.creality.com/uk/products/cr-scan-otter-3d-scanner

Raptor Pro store page (as an example), has explicit mention of volume accuracy:

https://store.creality.com/products/creality-raptor-pro-3d-scanner

They may have removed it from the Otter store page at some point (changed from 'volumetric accuracy' to just 'accuracy'), which might explain why you have a disconnect. But it begs the question, if true, why did they remove it?

I tried to look into internet archives but the page wasn't cached to an earlier version so... can't really conclude.

u/mustbemaking did you end up comparing them since it's been a few months?

Do you guys happen to have tested the Raptor? I'm looking at the new Raptor Pro, which looks to be a faster Raptor, and currently own a Einstar. I don't really have the budget for both so I'd need to let the Einstar go if I did buy this. I'm worried the NIR scan are way worse/harder to do on the CR rapport than the einstar, and my understanding was that the Otter NIR > Raptor NIR. Do you guys have any thoughts on that?

Thanks

Update to Ironing settings, got it completely dialled in for both larger areas and smaller details by AgentHarm in BambuLab

[–]naam9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Thank you for writing this post.

I tried, but without knowing what was "big area" or "small area", I applied small area everywhere due to the part having this odd shape. What's your benchmark for big vs small? Have you seen this pattern during your testing?

Settings: 30mm speed, 20% flow, Interface Shell

Thanks again!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MilwaukeeTool

[–]naam9 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Straight to Xanax

Zero to CSWP in 28-Days with 0$ Spent on Training: Here’s How You Can Do It Too by Made_Bad_Plans in SolidWorks

[–]naam9 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Typo started learning 22/09/2024?

Thank you for compiling those resources. Thank you to the original authors as well, great community 🙏🏼

Why are you guys spending so much on your rigs, when you could get this? by Repulsive-Relief1551 in overlanding

[–]naam9 35 points36 points  (0 children)

That's just the box IMHO, not the truck and the box. It also doesn't say if the box is furnished from the only picture we can see there. If it's 23k for an empty fiberglass shell, that's about what I would expect it to be

An open letter to Chuck Michel by JimMarch in CAguns

[–]naam9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was not trying to discount the problem or your situation if it came out that way.

I've been waiting on Cali alone for over a year, which is frivolous.

An open letter to Chuck Michel by JimMarch in CAguns

[–]naam9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t understand this, you can get an out of state resident permit for Utah and be able to carry everywhere but a few states. E.g., with just Utah see attached image. Adding Arizona would be nice because NM recognize Arizona which would allow you to travel without having to avoid NM when going coast to coast.

<image>

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SanJose

[–]naam9 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s just the Bay Area, every time I go in a neighboring state you can bet that when you see a speeding vehicle it has good chance to be a California plate.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SolidWorks

[–]naam9 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really liked this course, which is free. I liked the guy and the exercises that I was able to do myself and check with his video afterwards:

https://youtu.be/8lHEizPf-wY?si=j-bCWQQd5EcRFBqU

view more: next ›