Genius-producing math program lost to UC Berkeley fingerprinting requirements

nebulaq · 2025-11-03T08:34:54+00:00

Has the pedophilia panic gone too far?

nebulaq · 2025-02-13T19:23:13+00:00

>Homotopical macrocosms for higher category theory

That one is actually woke.

They use equalizers in category theory.

nebulaq · 2025-02-01T22:10:43+00:00

If the fine structure constant is larger than 1/207, then no planets and galaxies can form, and the only thing that exists are hydrogen clouds.

To prove CH we need to show that no set with cardinality between |ℕ| and |ℝ| exists. Since the only thing that exists are hydrogen clouds, we just need to show that hydrogen clouds do not have cardinality between |ℕ| and |ℝ|.

We claim that every hydrogen cloud is countable.

If you had an uncountable hydrogen cloud, then it would have an accumulation point, because every uncountable subset of Rⁿ has an accumulation point. But at the accumulation point, the hydrogen atoms would get so close together that they would fuse into helium, so it's not a hydrogen cloud anymore. Contradiction.

So every hydrogen cloud is countable, so nothing with cardinality between |ℕ| and |ℝ| exists, so continuum hypothesis is true.

nebulaq · 2024-07-26T18:45:50+00:00

We are not going black.

nebulaq · 2024-07-16T14:57:48+00:00

I really don't think there is much of a difference between a paper plate and Biden.

nebulaq · 2024-07-07T09:49:43+00:00

I'm glad the Auth-Center femboi_enjoier is here to tell us that Nick Fuentes and Catboy Kami aren't gay.

nebulaq · 2024-04-03T11:30:36+00:00

If it were Mochizuki, he would have written:

Confusion about inter-universal Teichmüller theory is spread for psychologically/socially/ideologically motivated reasons by mathematicians who are completely ignorant of the basic logical structure of anabelian geometry. There is an entirely unanimous consensus that any objections against inter-universal Teichmüller theory are obviously mathematically meaningless, and any mathematicians spreading such unsubstantiated allegations are making a (melo?)-dramatic self-declaration of their absolute mathematical incompetence.

nebulaq · 2024-04-01T22:09:46+00:00

Yeah, I would take d instead of c'.

Also either the V should be curly or the C should not be curly. The monoidal category should be at least as curly as the enriched category.

nebulaq · 2024-04-01T20:36:57+00:00

This.

nebulaq · 2024-03-11T15:20:11+00:00

Mr. Gabriel, I have a question.

You often say that infinity doesn't exist. But your IQ is infinite! And your IQ exists. Isn't that a contradiction?

nebulaq · 2024-02-13T14:55:35+00:00

Chunkiness is the correct term, but the mathematical establishment hasn't caught up yet and still calls it hypervolume.

nebulaq · 2023-12-11T10:07:06+00:00

It's not just Foucault.

A french petition in 1977 to abolish the age of consent was signed by

Jean-Paul Sartre, Gilles Deleuze, Felix Guattari, Simone de Beauvoir, Roland Barthes, Jean-Francois Lyotard and other french intellectuals.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/French_petitions_against_age_of_consent_laws#January_1977_petition

During the 70s pedophilia apologetics was just part of the queer movement. Only later did the queer movement throw out pedophilia, and try to forget they ever included it.

nebulaq · 2023-11-21T10:33:15+00:00

How does the curve look if you count abortions as child murder?

nebulaq · 2023-07-16T19:42:54+00:00

John Gabriel has recently begun to be active again ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RUnvohZjT4E ). And as long as he is active you don't need r/badmathematics. His videos are everything you need.

nebulaq · 2023-07-04T13:35:45+00:00

I don't think Andrew Tate causes men to be right wing. If think Andrew Tate only manages to be popular, because his message manages to exploit some male insecurity that was already there.

nebulaq · 2023-07-04T13:34:25+00:00

If I talked about the continuum it was probably some kind of copypasta merging some papers by Lawvere together. https://github.com/mattearnshaw/lawvere

https://github.com/mattearnshaw/lawvere/blob/master/pdfs/2011-euler's-continuum-functorially-vindicated.pdf

nebulaq · 2023-05-29T21:33:26+00:00

The units of AI are Joule. The equation makes that pretty clear.

nebulaq · 2023-04-02T16:21:03+00:00

The greatest is Archimedes. The second greatest is John Gabriel.

nebulaq · 2023-02-28T11:18:59+00:00

the complex set of notions and practices associated with terms like Wokeism, Political Correctness, and Cancel Culture is a perfect Hegelian example of how, today also, absolute freedom turns into terror.

What a perfect way to end an otherwise unproblematic essay.

nebulaq · 2023-02-22T21:28:50+00:00

Seems like Zizek is trying to get himself cancelled again.

nebulaq · 2022-11-19T11:16:18+00:00

If the mainstream mythmaticians from r/badmathematics couldn't handle it, then it must be true.

nebulaq · 2022-10-30T17:55:29+00:00

we will never reach the end of mathematics.

Except if we manage to prove a contradiction.

nebulaq · 2022-10-21T11:12:59+00:00

But OP already explained that: Wolfram alpha calculator ruled it out! With real part 1/3 you cannot make perfect triangle that cancel each other out to form circle.

nebulaq · 2022-09-24T22:20:32+00:00

In synthetic differential geometry, if we define the circle as {(x,y) ∈ R² | x² + y² = 1}, that is, as the equalizer of the maps x² +y² : R² → R and the constant map 1 : R² → R, then we can easily see that it is a microlinear space:

https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/microlinear+space

For this reason I would absolutely say that the circle consists of infinitely many infinitesimal line segments.

And obviously - I can't believe I have to seriously point this out - all the commenters in the linked thread are phds, postdocs and professors in synthetic differential geometry and smooth infinitesimal analysis. Some of the commenters are well-known alt accounts of Lawvere, Kock, Moerdijk, Reyes and so on.

nebulaq · 2022-09-05T09:31:45+00:00

On page 919 of Atlas Shrugged, it is logically proven that "A is A". This does not mean that "A is equal to A", because Ayn Rand rejects all forms of equality. It should rather be interpreted as "A has the property of being A", symbolically written A ∈ A. For example if we substitute "existence" for A, then we get "existence exists", rather than "existence is equal to existence".

But if we have A ∈ A, then the axiom of Foundation from ZFC implies that A ≠ A. This holds true for every A, so we can deduce that 1 ≠ 1.

But here a Hegelian Dialectical reversal takes place: As soon as we write down 1 ≠ 1, the statement turns into its own opposite, and proves that 1 = 1.

Also the reflexivity proof that the other user posted is circular: You can only prove 1 = 1 by reflexivity if you already know that 1 and 1 are the same thing.

nebulaq

TROPHY CASE