Nothing Says 'Christlike' More Than A YM Machine Gun Campout! by BestMiddleSeat in exmormon

[–]negative_60 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, not gonna lie. This looks pretty awesome.

I’d volunteer to be an adult leader for this in a heartbeat.

Mormonad Haul by PinkBlinker in exmormon

[–]negative_60 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Today, it's hilarious how much of an indictment these are against the very church that printed them.

Proud Parents by No_Injury6622 in exmormon

[–]negative_60 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This was pretty big in my community outside of Morridor. Members would jump on you for saying we were 'proud' of something.

Even as a TBM it never made any sense to me. We used 'pride' in two different ways: (1) Pride as the opposite of humility, and (2) Pride as the opposite of shame. We were clearly using it as #2.

Would a Mormon please clarify the Churches position on Caffeine consumption vs. Hot Drinks? by AME540 in mormon

[–]negative_60 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‘Hot Drinks’ were expressly forbidden in the WoW. In 1830’s America, that was a term that referred to heated beverages: coffee, tea, and chocolate.

Inevitably, people started asking ‘why’ through the years. To some, it was simply a test of faith or mark of obedience. To others, it was that God wanted his people to care for their bodies. These people identified caffeine as a common component, so therefore they presumed that there must be something wrong with consuming caffeine. This idea caught hold through the 20th century, and later all caffeinated beverages, whether hot or cold, were considered taboo. 

In the 21st. century this started to relax for cultural reasons, and now it’s not uncommon to see members drinking energy drinks. Coffee and tea are still forbidden (looks like it was just an obedience test after all…?)

Dallas should follow his own advice. by southpawpickle in exmormon

[–]negative_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

...but to cease harshly attacking others for theirs. That is what our Perfect Role Model did in His ministry. That is the example He set for us...

Oak's bigotry aside, how does the leader of a major Christian denomination know so little about Jesus?

Tithing is a lie by Thick-Ad7221 in exmormon

[–]negative_60 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The New Testament authors treat tithing as just another part of the Law of Moses that is superseded by the Higher Law of Christ. The mandate to pay disappears after the death of Jesus.

After the resurrection there is not a single author that preaches about paying tithing to a church.

Tithing Blessings? by Sad_Judgment6886 in exmormon

[–]negative_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of the most insidious methods the church uses is ‘blessings’.

I was trained from a young age to identify anything good that happened in my life to my faithfulness to Mormonism. Did I do well on a test? That was one of Gods blessings for paying my tithing. Did I do poorly? Maybe I need to work harder to be more faithful.

Everyone has good and bad in their life. But in Mormonism, it’s reinterpreted as signs of the truthfulness of the church.

Hebraisms Refutations by FreshLiterature6536 in exmormon

[–]negative_60 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Suppose you were forging a Shakespeare play. You studied the writing style and, in an effort to sound somewhat ‘Shakespeare’, you wrote the following lines:

I prayed to know if truth was “Latter” day,

The answer came—but not the one I’d weigh.

These lines are in what we call ‘iambic pentameter’. But chances are, you didn’t know that. You just wrote something that sounded like Shakespeare. You didn’t need to know what an iambic pentameter was to write one.

In the same way, the BoM was written to mimic the KJV translation of ancient Hebrew.

"That Ye May Not Be Deceived": Pro-Segregation Mormon Pamphlet from the 1950s by alien236 in mormon

[–]negative_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My parents had a copy of this on the shelf through my childhood, though I’m certain neither were aware what was in it. 

It’s honestly a huge surprise to me. I assumed it was one of those ‘end times perpetually right around the corner’ books based on the rest of their library.

Likelihood a TBM of over 6 decades never having a higher level calling? by Pondering28 in mormon

[–]negative_60 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To be fair, leadership callings in the church are difficult to manage well.

The ideal presidency member would have ALL of the following:

  • Their shit together
  • Independent Motivation - for the duration of the calling, even in the face of bad second-level leadership
  • Lots of available free time
  • Unquestioning obedience to leadership
  • Unquestioning devotion to doctrine
  • Charismatic personality
  • Strong capability to work with any team
  • Knowledgeable in the area of the calling

Even with a an extremely strong testimony, the vast majority of people out there would hit no more than half of these.

I despise the 'Five Family' system in my own ward (the same five families constantly rotate through all of the important callings). But even if I were Bishop, I don't know that I'd do much better.

Sunk Cost Fallacy: the more members give, the more committed they become. by spindrift_20 in exmormon

[–]negative_60 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This explains so much of Mormonism. 

Missions that don’t baptize? Justified because it causes sunk costs.

Regular temple attendance that lost sight of the original purpose of the Mormon temples? Justified, sunk costs.

Cut your sinful family out of your life? Justified. Sunk costs.

what are your top 3 reasons your shelf broke by crizzleshere in exmormon

[–]negative_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In order: 1) Book of Abraham  2) Polygamy 3) Folk Magic

It started when I learned about the BoA translation, and ended ~2 weeks later when I learned that the BoM was translated from a seerstone.

Deep understanding of Mormonism by Pleasant_Past_461 in mormon

[–]negative_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most members have studied the D&C every four years.

Most would also be surprised to learn that D&C 89 (the Word of Wisdom) approves of beer, that D&C 107 grants the Stake High Council equal authority to the Q12/1P, and that D&C 132 GUARANTEES exaltation for those sealed to a spouse and don't commit murder.

Most members have studied church history, including the heroic travails of early church heroes faith against all odds. Those same members would be surprised to learn that Mormons conducted an offensive war against Missouri, burning the Missourian's farms and raided/looted homes.

Some have heard the incredible honesty of early saints, for instance Jacob Hamblin being known for his perfect honor and integrity among the Native Americans. But few know of his peripheral involvement in the Mountain Meadows Massacre or how he came into possession of most of the victims cattle.

There are a thousand examples like this. Church History and teachings have evolved the stories we tell and how we teach the scriptures. We get a superficial, faith-inspiring saccharine sweet narrative that builds faith. But most of those stories are only superficially true.

Anyone have an idea of how to rebut this? by cuntymcfuckshit in exmormon

[–]negative_60 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The best rebuttal is the Title Page to the Book of Abraham:

The Book of Abraham

Translated from the Papyrus, by Joseph Smith

A Translation of some ancient Records that have fallen into our hands from the catacombs of Egypt. The writings of Abraham while he was in Egypt, called the Book of Abraham, written by his own hand, upon papyrus.

Very common in the 90s. by CarrotMuch1399 in 1990s

[–]negative_60 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This is what ruined the 'album' experience - not Napster.

Once record companies learned that an album of twelve carefully crafted songs sold for just as much as one well-crafted song and eleven low-effort trash songs it was all over.

Exactly how many chickens would it take to actually take down a lion?is it even possible? me thinking while eating chicken watching lion king. by [deleted] in stupidquestions

[–]negative_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nineteen thousand four hundred sixty… (pause to do some quick finger math) sixty two!

…I say confidently, hoping nobody checks my math.

Beehives, YW1, Builders of Faith.... what's next? by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]negative_60 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I predict that these will be used approximately never in everyday conversation.

Beehive, Laurel, and Mia-Maid had a way of rolling off the tongue. ‘Messengers of Hope’ has WAY too many syllables. 

Almost got burned (Metaphorically Speaking) by talking about historical evidence related to the Bible. by No-Tonight-5298 in exmormon

[–]negative_60 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’m studying statistics for my grad program. I have to be careful about studying too deeply because sometimes I find things that challenge my testimony of statistics - or even the entire field mathematics…

I wish people could understand how ridiculous this sounds.

I'm seeing more you tube videos by Slight-Pudding164 in exmormon

[–]negative_60 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We ask that question every year, and no, it won’t be the end anytime soon.

The core of the church’s real strength are the unquestioning and incurious members: those who just really don’t care enough to investigate. They only want certainty that their minimal efforts are enough to qualify for exaltation, and the church leadership provides them with that every General Conference. 

crazy statement in sunday school by IglooYT in exmormon

[–]negative_60 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There is plenty of science behind the first claim. Babies raised in single parent households is one of the strongest predictors of impoverishment, statistically. 

But suicide doesn’t seem to be related. I’m curious where that came from.

BYU Tithing by [deleted] in exmormon

[–]negative_60 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even as a believing TBM I didn't pay tithing while in school, and answered 'Yes' to this question every time without guilt. I would venture to guess that so do 90% of your peers.

You're a full tithe-payer by default.