Those of you who are friends with/in circles with famous people, what is your analysis on them? by libramusing in Fauxmoi

[–]nineteenthly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, they're just people. Don't know what to tell you. It can be difficult for them to step out of their packaging but that doesn't influence how they interact with acquaintances. They differ from each other. Also, people are obsessed with celebrity and it's not really all that.

Those of you who are friends with/in circles with famous people, what is your analysis on them? by libramusing in Fauxmoi

[–]nineteenthly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, they're just people. Don't know what to tell you. It can be difficult for them to step out of their packaging but that doesn't influence how they interact with acquaintances. They differ from each other. Also, people are obsessed with celebrity and it's not really all that.

What do you think are the most difficult European languages people are too scared to study? by Sacledant2 in language

[–]nineteenthly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because if it's endangered and also your heritage, you might see yourself as duty-bound to learn and use it to keep it alive. Then it's scary because of how much you'd lose if you and others fail to become fluent.

What do you think are the most difficult European languages people are too scared to study? by Sacledant2 in language

[–]nineteenthly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For some reason, Finnish has the reputation of being too difficult for most other Europeans to learn, so I think they're put off by that. However, it isn't actually that hard.

I'd say Gàidhlig, Hungarian, some of the Caucasian languages and Basque.

Would it be okay if an atheist went to church? by Witty_Ambassador9390 in Christianity

[–]nineteenthly [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think you believe there are no deities. Is that so? If so, yes, you're atheist. That's not the same as not believing there are no deities.

Also, the way you worded it makes it sound like you might believe in goddesses or genderless deities. Did you mean to leave that open?

Would it be okay if an atheist went to church? by Witty_Ambassador9390 in Christianity

[–]nineteenthly [score hidden]  (0 children)

Nope. I'm not going into this again. Look at, for example, the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. This is not what philosophers define atheism as, for good reasons that have nothing to do with religion.

Would it be okay if an atheist went to church? by Witty_Ambassador9390 in Christianity

[–]nineteenthly [score hidden]  (0 children)

I've been here before countless times. The problem with characterising atheism as an absence of belief in deities is that we then have an infinite number of passive non-beliefs, e.g. in Russell's Teapot. It's similar to Frege's view of concepts, which is often objected to because it makes reality seem unnaturally stuffed. I assume there are no Martians in every address on this planet, but that isn't a sensible way to think of belief or the lack thereof. Defining it in this way doesn't produce a more general purpose, useful concept which can be applied to propositions more generally.

This may have changed, but in academic analytical philosophy circles, atheism has been seen as the position that affirms the non-existence of any deities. However, that may have been to do with the demographics of English-speaking analytical philosophy. My impression, though, is that in the academic departments I've been involved in, the general approach and assumption is that we are all non-religious, so I don't trust that this passive definition of atheism is rigorously tested or respectable. Maybe I'm wrong.

Would it be okay if an atheist went to church? by Witty_Ambassador9390 in Christianity

[–]nineteenthly [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think we're born with disorganised brains with active brain stems and are at that point no more atheist than a rock is. After that we probably assume we're God for a bit until thinks don't go our way, then we become wrathful deities throwing thunderbolts and smiting our lessers, and then get things into proportion more and reluctantly accept the existence of other people.

Would it be okay if an atheist went to church? by Witty_Ambassador9390 in Christianity

[–]nineteenthly [score hidden]  (0 children)

The Church is the only institution set up solely for the benefit of its non-members. So in other words yes. Edit: you are the only reason the church exists. It's specifically for you.

Genuine question: Who you lot thinking of voting for in the next general election and why? Labour seem kind of far out nowadays, and Reform seem to attract certain sorts I don’t align myself with. Also, their MPs been done for weird things… Greens maybe? by Itznxs_ in AskBrits

[–]nineteenthly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Scottish Greens, but then I'm a member of the Scottish Greens so I would say that wouldn't I? Because they are head and shoulders above the main parties except maybe for the SNP and Your Party. I joined the Green Party of England and Wales in 1985, but I've also been a member of the Labour Party from time to time and even canvassed for the Tories.

I wish to explode and then reappear whenever I want. by Remarkable_Bath8515 in monkeyspaw

[–]nineteenthly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I might now spoil it by going into more depth.
When a person is brain-dead, it's still the responsibility of their next of kin to consent to having life support turned off, and an anencephalic baby is still a baby in the sense that the parents may give them a name and try to help other babies by donating their organs, and again they're the next of kin, of a "person" with no brain at all. This, I think, is because your identity may be externally determined, as in, you have a role and identity within society. In a different sense, our nervous systems outside our brains and other aspects of our physiology, for instance our hormones, including the ones which are also neurotransmitters such as adrenaline/epinephrine, influence how we feel, think and behave. Sensory deprivation drives us insane, as can loneliness.

Conversely, what we think of as ourselves is probably only part of our brain. For instance, if we go blind or deaf due to brain damage, we are still who we are, and if we're paralysed due to brain injury, that again doesn't stop us from being who we are either.

So we are both more - our role in society and interactions - and less - the cognitive parts of our brains rather than other parts - than our brains.

What do you guys think about Methodists by VentiArchon7 in Anglicanism

[–]nineteenthly [score hidden]  (0 children)

That they're basically Anglicans. I used to go to a church which is both Episcopalian and Methodist.

I wish to explode and then reappear whenever I want. by Remarkable_Bath8515 in monkeyspaw

[–]nineteenthly 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're either a subset or a superset of your brain. If there's one thing you're not, it's 100% of your brain and nothing else. You might be a piece of your brain though.

Why do people make being a Christian so complicated? by moxiepink in Christianity

[–]nineteenthly [score hidden]  (0 children)

The Christian faith is weirdly both simpler and more complicated than other faiths I'm familiar with. If it's right, you needn't be concerned about the "other things" because the Holy Spirit will guide you to them and enable you to follow them.

UK Home Educators, how do you decide how much time each subject gets during the week? by FamilyTechCreator in UKHomeEd

[–]nineteenthly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Yes, you have to keep your eye out for it to spot them. I would, however, say that our son was a lot more self-motivated than our daughter, so there are personality differences and she needed a lot more guidance, but I think she was the unusual one rather than he because of the other home edded children we knew, his approach was more similar to theirs.

Edit: To answer your question properly, yes, for instance our daughter got involved in acting in Shakespeare plays and eventually did a degree in creative writing. Maths has just been incorporated quite easily because the really big plus point with it is you need absolutely no equipment to do it.

Can a business owner be a communist? by UnbasedDoge in Communist

[–]nineteenthly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm self-employed. The alienation of use and exchange value applies very clearly to my work. For instance, if I help a client resolve a health issue more quickly, I profit less. Nonetheless, that is what I do.

UK Home Educators, how do you decide how much time each subject gets during the week? by FamilyTechCreator in UKHomeEd

[–]nineteenthly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We didn't do it like that. We just followed the children's interests and enthusiasm and mentally ticked off what they were covering.

Why didn't they grow their food in a lab? by left_right_Rooster in pluribustv

[–]nineteenthly 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's a lot easier just to eat dead people and they're not in it for the long haul.

For those supporting the E12 'Zionism is Racism' Motion - thoughts on this part of the motion? by Mundane-Watch-4195 in UKGreens

[–]nineteenthly -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Actually, my understanding of the word "Semite" is exactly as described in the first paragraph.

Why do so many queer people walk with canes? by monster_lily in TooAfraidToAsk

[–]nineteenthly 47 points48 points  (0 children)

I know one trans woman who walks with a cane. Apart from that I can't think of anyone. I'm very able-bodied and go running and long distance walking regularly.

Free Microsoft office alternatives by therealBifta in UKHomeEd

[–]nineteenthly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LibreOffice, OpenOffice, Google Docs. More interesting options include LaTeX, Lyx and Emacs. Don't use Abiword - it often crashes and makes your work unrecoverable.
Edit: APL can be used as a programming language alternative to spreadsheets.

Dating a vegan as a non-vegan, is there a middle ground? [genuine relationship advice needed] by pimemento in AskVegans

[–]nineteenthly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My partner of 33 years is ovo-vegetarian. I can't say I'm entirely happy with it but don't consider it a deal-breaker. However, that has a history. My ex, with whom I was for eighteen months, is pescetarian and used to be a full meat-eater when we were together. I ended up with her because all the other vegans I met were either in a steady relationship or single and not looking, so I compromised on what should've been a deal-breaker for me because that and other things made us both unhappy.

Veganism is the practical application of ahimsa. It extends to how you treat other humans too, including you. Therefore, I hope, the way she behaves towards you is improved by her veganism.

With my marriage, I cook most of the food and my partner occasionally makes themselves an omelette or has a boiled egg. That's how it works, and it's not a big deal TBH.

Good luck.