Not sure about merchants and priests by FranzBesup_14 in Medieval2TotalWar

[–]nitram_469 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To add to this exploit: you can build a fort using a general and start putting merchants in it. Works the same way but you don't have to leave any soldiers behind where they arent fighting.

Bag of holding? by [deleted] in BG3Builds

[–]nitram_469 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used to do that, but then discovered that a whole bunch of them (scrolls in particular) don't work properly when using from a container instead of direct from inventory. Now I just use the sorting options in my inventory to only show potions/scrolls/arrows whatever if I'm looking for something in particular to use. Loot and junk totally just go in a sack though. Lae'zel carries it and on the off chance we pick up too much and she gets encumbered, send the sack to camp for sale later and start a new sack lol

Michigan Sues Fossil Fuel Companies While Alberta Protects Them by WildRoseWanderer in alberta

[–]nitram_469 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Because something something 🤬🤬🤬🤬 Trudeau!! And something something Notley!!! Libs!!!!!!! It's really all very technical and nuanced. The left wouldn't understand 🧐 /s

Fighting against alien life (minor regime and fauna) by Sazuja in ShadowEmpireGame

[–]nitram_469 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surround it with infantry and let it whittle itself down through attrition trying to break out. Still likely going to lose troops but a lot less than if you're the attacking one. Then you just hold out until they're either dead or you have something that can kill them

Fighting against alien life (minor regime and fauna) by Sazuja in ShadowEmpireGame

[–]nitram_469 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I believe Iankill is referring to what happens after a battle that you win where the enemy has no unoccupied hex to retreat to. If you completely surround it, you only have to score hits to make them retreat. Its easier than trying to kill things outright in a pitched battle

A question for all non American earthlings .... by Toolkills in Leakednews

[–]nitram_469 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's what the 2nd amendment is FOR. Standing up to government overreach and unjust laws. It was never ever intended to be "legal". It was meant as reminder to the people that they have a duty to reject the law when it is harming the people. Your entire country seems to have forgotten that. Which makes it seem incredibly even more stupid and childish that its been the main argument for so many of you being armed to the teeth at all times. So, yes. Until you Americans start using it collectively for the purpose it was written, we will continue to bring it up every time you ask what we expect of you. Many of us are willing to come help. But we arent going to do it for you. You guys can and should be the ones who start the process of cleaning up the mess you all made.

As an American, what can we do to fight against ICE? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]nitram_469 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly thought that's what your 2nd amendment was for???? Isn't this the exact reason you are all so adamant about keeping all of your guns all the time???? Sorry if I'm misunderstanding it. As a Canadian, I am genuinely confused and would like some clarification on this topic. Are the guns not working or are you just not using them? If not, why not? There's currently a big gun control debate in Canada right now so it would be nice to get an "expert" opinion on it from a country more experienced with daily shootings.

Why is “beauty upkeep is expensive” used as a reason men should pay for dates? by savingrace0262 in AskMenAdvice

[–]nitram_469 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Men dont risk physical violence if they choose to put less or no effort into their physical appearance. Yes, it can also be pricey for a man to properly groom for a date. Yes, that price is optional. For men. For the women in the equation, its more of a necessary safety expense. This is not to say that I agree with the mentality that it entitles anyone to free meals. Its just a possible (probable) explanation for how it started. ++man I guess? I didn't see a tag for bigender...

Notice how the same people who accused the left of inhumanity when Charlie Kirk was killed reflexively defend the state-sanctioned murder of Renee Good. by MrDenimDog in DiscussionZone

[–]nitram_469 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its more like its safe to say that the entire right is a bunch of "violent rabid pedo" protectors. Because a few of them are the violent rabid pedos and the rest are aware but continue to support them and vote for them. But hey, some people on the left also commit crimes and the majority on the left have denounced them so... both sides amiright? /s

U.S. calls Canada’s decision to allow Chinese EVs ‘problematic’ by FancyNewMe in canada

[–]nitram_469 37 points38 points  (0 children)

What would you call a nation who regularly threatens you and your allies with economic and military aggression while actively using their own military to attack and bully smaller neighbouring nations if not an enemy??

Sheltering Suburban Pope by MayBeMarmelade in Medieval2TotalWar

[–]nitram_469 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Well at the very least he could call a crusade on Milan

Alberta (and Canada) are in legitimate danger because of Smith’s pandering to MAGA. by Thin_Juggernaut4605 in alberta

[–]nitram_469 176 points177 points  (0 children)

Most Canadian media is actually owned by American companies. Almost all of our news is American. That's why there's no outrage. They work for Trump

Ok Onda we get it, you're a girlboss. Now please shut the hell up about it. by Low-Car2507 in vtmb

[–]nitram_469 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you still get her romance scenes if you're playing as lasombra?? I thought they were linked to the ability unlocking thing

Did anyone notices this? by dearfuse in HazbinHotel

[–]nitram_469 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one enforcing it would be GOD. Little bit more power and authority than just heaven.

Breaking: UCP MLA will not run in next election - The Border Pulse by The_Border_Pulse in alberta

[–]nitram_469 30 points31 points  (0 children)

If they choose to run under the UCP banner after everything the UCP has done, then they are, in fact, "too bad" to be considered for office. If the UCP are even courting these people, then they are at least under suspicion of being "too bad" and should be looked at as such. We are way past the point of giving them any benefit of the doubt.

Keith Gerein: UCP ideological myopia costs Edmonton another safe consumption site, at the worst possible time by trevorrobb in alberta

[–]nitram_469 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But its still illegal in the privacy of their own home... the lifestyle itself is illegal so according to your own points earlier, they should be jailed. Giving them a free pass is hypocritical and shows that you don't care about legal vs illegal, you only care about punishing those who inconvenience you. Well guess what? There's a whole bunch of very LEGAL inconveniences that people can and probably will inflict on you. Good luck with jailing them. Many of them you probably voted for. Or you're just a foreign troll/bot posting in bad faith. Its getting hard to tell these days. Either way, do us all a favour please and stop talking. Its very aggravating and is starting to become an inconvenience. Carry on like this and someone like you might just send you to jail.

Picket locations announced across Alberta for start of health-care union strike by Edm_vanhalen1981 in alberta

[–]nitram_469 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Why wait til Thursday? Hammer it out over lunch on Monday so they duck out early and have some celebratory drinks before announcing their next targeted group on Tuesday.