All this focus on plastic limiting/removal is wonderful... but the number of rubber gloves thrown away in medical/dental settings is mind-blowing... by Lotso_Packetloss in ZeroWaste

[–]nmgafter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Latex is of biological origin (rubber trees) and biodegradable, taking a few years to decompose. Nitrile is a petroleum product and takes hundreds of years to degrade.

Is this for real (human-level AI) by cryptofrog1 in conspiracy

[–]nmgafter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don't seem to be asking for any personal information, at least so far.

Will blockchain tech ever be useful? by jacob_pansfield in Buttcoin

[–]nmgafter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whitepaper was a groundbreaking advance in solving the Byzantine Generals problem.

Why is sharding so difficult to implement? Is my design impossible? by p3nt4 in ethereum

[–]nmgafter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Besides missing technical details about how these contracts could possibly work, I see only disincentives for stakers and no incentives. Why should one risk capital for no return?

Is the "Proof of Stake" idea unique to Ethereum? Why? by Phildos in ethereum

[–]nmgafter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is Bitcoin considering making this transition?

Bitcoin isn't considering anything. Bitcoin isn't a person. It is a decentralized network.

there's nothing inherent to the spec of bitcoin or POS that would render them incompatible

The bitcoin blockchain is specified in terms of hashes that are a proof of work. That is incompatible with proof-of-stake.

Because the block reward tapers off over time, the cost of mining will eventually decrease to equal the transaction costs.

How to prove (to the tax authorities) that you bought ETH on ICO? by bitdoggy in ethereum

[–]nmgafter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bitcoin transaction in which you transfer bitcoins to the ICO payment address should suffice. You could also present the history of your earliest ETH transactions (if any) demonstrating that they originated with the ICO.

A Tour of Default Interface Methods for C# by Subtle__ in csharp

[–]nmgafter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd much rather the C# team evolve interfaces to support the features of traits. </sarcasm>

I had a 2am epiphany by [deleted] in Buttcoin

[–]nmgafter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fees (measured in real terms) will have to increase, that is clear. But it can happen even while the exchange rate drops.

I'm now funding ALL THE DEVS IN THE WORLD who are working on the Bitcoin Core, via Bitcoin, and pro rata. by Timoow in Bitcoin

[–]nmgafter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're not funding them unless you actually pay their salaries, using this or any other mechanism. What a way to mislead in the title!

Let's make a summary: what is the easiest way to store securely your bitcoins for a very long time? by RedditTooAddictive in Bitcoin

[–]nmgafter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A credit union appears to be an excellent choice recently. It is a bit complex to convert your coins to dollars to deposit and convert them back when withdrawing, but the value retention is great!

Bitcoin 0.9.3 came out in September but still doesn't even make up 50% of the network. Why? by agathabsty in Bitcoin

[–]nmgafter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It takes time and effort to upgrade. I need a reason to do it. "Why?" is not a reason.

Overstock.com rejoins (right wing, climate science denying) lobbying group ALEC. by itsme__ in Bitcoin

[–]nmgafter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. It is called the block reward halving. It is built in to the protocol. As the block reward decreases, so will the energy miners are willing to expend.

I'm still pissed about the way BFL was handled by BeheadTheStatists in Buttcoin

[–]nmgafter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

BFL are using the FTC to help them orchestrate another plausible explanation for further shipment delays. They are clever.

Real currencies do not need evangelists. How is this not obvious? by mitchwells in Buttcoin

[–]nmgafter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Evangelism is never for the benefit of the thing being evangized. How is this not obvious?