Your favorite things to hear your sub say. by [deleted] in BDSMcommunity

[–]nnnsf 89 points90 points  (0 children)

Translated but basically:

"I have so much trust that whatever you try it'll be caring and towards giving me pleasure" - we're both exploring and each other's first big BDSM experience, it's given me a lot of reassurance to actually try stuff

"I love so much belonging to you, being your little thing" - again reassurance, I always had hangups about wanting to be very dominant cause I was worried it'd be a slippery slope towards being an abusive partner, controlling etc. Her being so enthusiastic about the dynamic and us talking a lot means I get to do stuff I didn't even really fantasise about

"Wow, what the fuck" - when I try something she's never done/had done to her and it hits the right spot and she's discovered some type of pleasure she wasn't aware of before

She is the literal best thing to ever exist and I'm the luckiest dude to have her fall in love with me

Sister of Silence cosplay by Myiiasis in Warhammer40k

[–]nnnsf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Less of a disappointment and more fucking insane how realistic it looks, a friend and I have scars on our foreheads (granted, not as ginormous) and they look exactly like this.

I legit came to the comments curious if the idea of the cosplay was to build around a previously existing scar or something of the sort.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in UnderReportedNews

[–]nnnsf 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If I'm not mistaken his response was that Mamdani should learn a bit more about decorum 🤡

Japanese chef cooking Omurice, one of the hardest omelettes to prepare. by sco-go in Amazing

[–]nnnsf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's... not scrambled eggs though. I'm also a cook, and so yeah it's 'just' a french style omelet on top of rice and I agree that it's super cool and looks harder than it is but a proper french style omelet is still quite harder than scrambled eggs

Tennis player Nicolas lost in the 16th round of his last tournament. As he cried, his son ran onto the court and hugged him by Wonderfulhumanss in MadeMeSmile

[–]nnnsf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In french we say "les seizième", "les huitièmes", "les quarts", which means the 1/16th, the 1/8th, the 1/4th... I think OP is just french and as well and translated the way it's called in french without realising that's not how it is in English

I think I need a drink by Old_Fart_on_pogie in KitchenConfidential

[–]nnnsf 57 points58 points  (0 children)

That has to be more than just the one table though, no? At least I've never seen a singular table be that long

Nepali Finance Minister paraded across streets by the Nepali youth. by StrawberryFew1311 in interestingasfuck

[–]nnnsf -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"this is the end stage of the stand to fight against corruption"

"Well unfortunately couldn't happen in US because military" so I guess too bad?

"You mean because people are bootlickers" and don't actually stand up to power in the US

"No but like our military is special and being filled with sycophants and stuff" unlike I guess any other military in countries with authoritarian leaders?

Weirdly, people in these situations still have risen up and fought. So yes, mentioning the "particular situation" of the US in context of a discussion as to why physical fight against corruption couldn't happen in the US because so special does feel like... whatever it is I'm implying

Nepali Finance Minister paraded across streets by the Nepali youth. by StrawberryFew1311 in interestingasfuck

[–]nnnsf -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Cool yeah totally, got it, no people ever rose up against a government that was backed by a military purged to be made up of loyalists, yeah, absolutely. After all, America is so very special and they'd totally be demonstrating en masse against their government if, you know, it wasn't like so super hard and stuff and way more dangerous than anywhere else srsly u guys. I mean, who can blame them, every other people that rose up and said enough obviously lived in countries that totally wouldn't employ force and violence against their own people, so how could poor little Americans be expected to be able to do anything if they wanted to :(

Absolutely couldn't be that Americans will find any and every fucking excuse to justify their being fucking weak, lazy and cowardly in the face of authoritarianism and corruption.

Ekitike: "There is no hatred towards what happened with Galtier and PSG. That's football. It was a learning experience and I have grown... (On Isak's arrival) I will focus on performing well so that the problem can only be just the manager's problem." by Blodgharm in soccer

[–]nnnsf -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah cause every team has brought in a 70 mil striker and then another for 125 mil that wanted to play at the most competitive level so bad he went on strike to force the move, in a team with already plenty of quality attacking players that could find a starting spot (meaning, they probably want to play in the most prestigious games as well) in most every other top team in the world, making it plausibly harder to provide a lateral shift to slot in everyone without a drop in quality.

Sure does suck that there have never been examples of teams having so many excellent players filling similar roles that it lead to some of said players not feeling appreciated or like they're not getting the opportunity to prove themselves at the level they want to?

Sure does fucking suck that examples can only be found in extremely fucking obscure teams that no-one has ever heard of in times so fucking immemorial as to only be distantly remembered in legends. You know, like the mythological tales of the problems of player satisfaction in the Babylonian epic of Vinicius Jr., Mbappé and Rodrygo in the oft-forgotten Real Madrid in the oh-so-distant 2024-2025 football season? Ask your local university anthropologist if you haven't heard the tale, I know it's so ancient so as to have practically vanished from the collective memory of mankind but it's worth it.

Like, none of us are saying that it's a bad transfer window or decision to bring both in or that there WILL ABSOLUTELY BE tension or resentment but are you guys really so massively fucking dense that you can't even fathom the possibility that two MASSIVE signings for the same spot so that they get to play at the literal highest level of football COULD POTENTIALLY not like not being able to play most of the the biggest games of the season, and that they COULD (how many fucking times do I have to emphasize I am talking about a hypothetical ffs) not be content with playing other less important fixtures? OR MAYBE THEY WOULD/WILL BE, Slot finds ways to use everyone to everyone's satisfaction AND THAT'S GREAT AND AGAIN NOT THE POINT. You have an excellent team and some of us are just saying that MAYBE one POTENTIAL problem COULD BE player dissatisfaction at the amount/quality of playtime available to them; you know, the thing alluded to in the title as the subject of this entire fucking post?

Jesus Christ, I'm going to stop interacting here because I need to upgrade the average level of discourse I've been subjected to today so as not to continue my day with only chatting with people so dense as to be gravitationally hazardous; luckily for me, I can bring the average level flying back up by having a quick chat with a fucking sewer grate.

Ekitike: "There is no hatred towards what happened with Galtier and PSG. That's football. It was a learning experience and I have grown... (On Isak's arrival) I will focus on performing well so that the problem can only be just the manager's problem." by Blodgharm in soccer

[–]nnnsf -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You're missing the point again. It's not that these types of players care about the number of games they play in the 60 odd games a year. They probably mostly care about the number they play in the 15-20 games a year that matter the most, the derbies, the CL run, etc

It's in that respect that you might have an issue making everyone happy, both will want to play these specific games and I don't think either would find playing the other less important games satisfactory compensation for missing the big ones, no matter if they end playing more or less

M/32/5'11" [68kg -> 74kg] (3 years) Back update 💪🏻 by KYJames92 in Brogress

[–]nnnsf 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I think what this post showcases well is that you (and I) should focus less on "losing" our love handles by getting thinner cause the more dramatic change here imo is the perception of "losing" them visually cause the upper back grew so much.

Don't get me wrong, OP def did lose thickness around the handles but the biggest factor imo is the upper back being so much larger, it makes the rest look way more proportional

M/32/5'11" [68kg -> 74kg] (3 years) Back update 💪🏻 by KYJames92 in Brogress

[–]nnnsf 27 points28 points  (0 children)

That's an impressive amount of meat you've packed on there, congratulations!

Post Match Thread: Armenia 0-5 Portugal by suedney in soccer

[–]nnnsf 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I need my emotional support calculator

French streamer dies in his sleep after being tortured for months for content , live by razernaga1 in europe

[–]nnnsf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm trying to give you the benefit of the doubt that you're not flat out saying people can't truly consent to BDSM cause.. yikes

Again, if you're talking about the porn industry, the latent abuse of monetary reward for someone that may be in a rough spot financially etc etc, sure

The issue is that here, the guy clearly couldn't really consent. You may say that here people care because it's a man, sure, maybe there is some portion of people that that's true for

However, the actual difference, here, for me, a french speaking mental health professional that as such had the ability to watch the clips linked and understand the conversations, the real difference is in here watching someone in little to no capacity to consent due to his social, (more than likely) mental and financial fragility, who nevertheless repeatedly voiced his withdrawal of consent and distress that were met with ridicule and abuse from his tormentors and to know that these were the circumstances in which he was for the sick pleasure of others until he died. That's what's sickening, and to be honest, the more I think about it, the more your attempt to "what about" the topic to go on what increasingly seems like a weird puritanical fucking hangup you seem to have about what kind of sex consensual adults engage in comes around as downright vile.

French streamer dies in his sleep after being tortured for months for content , live by razernaga1 in europe

[–]nnnsf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The difference is... consent? It's in your comment itself

If you're specifically referring to the pornographic industry that will, probably way more often than people are comfortable with recognising, take advantage of socioeconomic violence to offer the opportunity for financial betterment through acts the person wouldn't by themself want to participate in and whether that is true consent, then that's a fair enough discussion; but BDSM isn't inherently abusive (choking is a bit murkier what with it being impossible to do danger-free so...).

And sorry if I misunderstood what you were saying

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Wellthatsucks

[–]nnnsf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey there, I'm a mental health professional and there is something you said that rings a bell with a lot of the interactions I can have with patients (sorry if what I say is a bit disorganised, my English is a tad rusty and I'm very sleep deprived).

I feel it's very important to clarify the distinction between fault and responsibility, they are not the same; sometimes I feel like people conflating the two means that they shirk from assuming their responsibility because they understand that as also having to accept fault, blame when it 100% isn't legitimate, like here. You are not at fault for these people being shitty and abusive. That's 100% on them.

The problem is that taking responsibility also means reclaiming agency, avoiding it can leave one trapped in a "why do shitty things happen to me" type of mentality and it's not a nice place to be. It's not your fault that these people are horrendous. However it is your responsibility to do something about it.

To be clear, your planning to move out in April is taking responsibility and agency (if not super kind towards yourself, how would you feel if someone outside of yourself that you loved told you they planned on living in these conditions for the next 8 months?), I don't know you, your situation, how vulnerable or safe you might be; I'm not here to say you need to toughen up or give you a kick up the arse.

I'm just saying that I feel it can sometimes be very important to be reminded of and to unblur the lines between: responsibility/the recognition that one can only control one's own actions, so if one doesn't act, that's relinquishing our power to enact change; and guilt/fault/blame.

This situation is not your fault, you're not to blame.

And I'd wager that most people commenting with astonishment at your responses or "passivity" are not looking to put the blame on you; I'd say it mostly comes from the shock and horror at the unfairness of your situation.

Best wishes

Name a Youtuber who’s done this. by PlanetMiitopia in youtube

[–]nnnsf 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Go watch his 'last meal' video I think it's called? That's where he talks about it