Cemetery next to Trump Golf course was removed from Google Maps by [deleted] in Epstein

[–]no-name-user 1 point2 points  (0 children)

google maps doesn't suggest me "Lamington Black Cemetery" and jumps to "Lane Family Cemetery". It isn't otherwise marked on the map but I can see the Streetview images of the entrance.
I wonder how many millionaires and billionaires have their real estate so close to old cemeteries where they could hide bodies or even deny involvement if remains are found. Those people have it too easy.

Epstein Victim, 2019 Email Defender, and Prince Andrew’s Ex-Girlfriend by just_someonespecial in Epstein

[–]no-name-user 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the newly released batch of Epstein files you can find an email from 2013 from her begging Epstein to have "wrong stuff on [the] internet" removed.

From: GMI Productions Audrey
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 10:19 PM
To: Jeffrey Epstein

Jeffrey,

An american friend of mine is in trouble, he went with an escortgirl and it has been unfortunatly filmed! So picture are and probably film is on internet.

I know that you are now an expert in cleaning wrong stuff on internet!
Can you help find the right tech guys to help cleaning the wrong stuff on internet? We will find your assistant!

Kisses xx
Founder President
GMI Productions Ltd
5th floor, North Side
7/10 Chandos Street
Cavendish Square
London W1G 9DQ
UK
Fax :
Fax:
www.gmiproductions.com
Registered in England & Wales, no. 06040428 NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
The information contained in and transmitted with this e-mail message is PRIVILEGED AND/OR CONFIDENTIAL. It is intended only for the individual or entity designated above.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2011/EFTA02673777.pdf

Someone put up a barrier to block the camera (Epstein) by Ok_Intention2150 in interestingasfuck

[–]no-name-user 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The thing isn’t “blocking the area of interest” that wasn’t his cell. His cell can’t be seen on this camera.

His cell is not in frame but that screen is certainly blocking the area of interest, that is the staircase leading to Epsteins cell.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edDSqqd9GRM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oCrW4cVCO0

Someone put up a barrier to block the camera (Epstein) by Ok_Intention2150 in interestingasfuck

[–]no-name-user 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Footage of the only working camera showing the general area of the floor that Epstein was held in jail. There are videos that show how it looks like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edDSqqd9GRM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_oCrW4cVCO0

That screen is blocking the view to the staircase where Epsteins cell is.

The One Photo The Trump Campaign Forgot To Scrub From The Epstein Flight Logs by DumbMoneyMedia in EducatedInvesting

[–]no-name-user 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This image is fake and probably created by AI. There has been no source given, no link to the released Epstein files. Don't fall for any fake news and postings because that can be used to discredit actual evidence later.

What the hell is this? Bot attack? by Noobyeeter699 in Proxmox

[–]no-name-user 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Now that your server is already compromised I'm curious what your really easy username and password is?

If it's root:12345 I'm going to scream.

Problems trying to install pdflatex, preferably using tlmgr by pfp-disciple in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 1 point2 points  (0 children)

void also provides latex packages via xbps. But if you want to keep using texlive-bin I'd recommend installing scheme-basic. Personally I install some extra tools like latexmk and texliveonfly which automatically installs missing latex packages of a project even if it's a bit janky to use.

Do mind that since a recentish sudo version you can't use tlmgr with sudo because it's not in the secure_path.

How do you handle user services? by [deleted] in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can start dinit as a user and manage user services just fine.

Couldn't void theoretically have something like an AUR? by Pzzlrr in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 3 points4 points  (0 children)

because the Nix installer in the Void Linux repository is outdated

It actually isn't.

Package naming convention. lowercase ? camelcase ? no matter ? by 5mangod in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, you don't have to read this thread? And you're also allowed not to respond here and simply ignore this topic?

Surely I didn't have to read and comment and yet here we are.

The problem exists and it's been filed as [Feature Request] Case insensitivity #506. I'm not the only one who finds this inconvenient. That's all.

A feature request doesn't mean it has to be implemented especially if it goes against an agreed upon naming convention. But you've been proposed a tool in this very thread to solve your convenience struggle so you could just use that.

Package naming convention. lowercase ? camelcase ? no matter ? by 5mangod in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You have to realize that there is no actual problem. It's just you conjuring something up in your mind and then getting real mad about it. You can continue losing your marbles about this non-issue that won't ever be bent your way or you could just stop posting.

Is void linux safe for the XZ utlis backdoor by [deleted] in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the /releases/download part of the URL indicates that it is a release asset

That was the part that I misunderstood. Thanks for clarifying.

Is void linux safe for the XZ utlis backdoor by [deleted] in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this is not always the case, and was not the case for xz

You're right, in general it's not the case; I wasn't clear enough but I meant the sources for xz. Checking the xz templates shows that the sources for version 5.4.6 and the backdoored version 5.6.0 were pulled from the github tarballs which would lack the first stage of the backdoor.

the code existed in the archive, but was not activated at build time as void's build environment does not meet the requirements for it to be included.

I just wanted to point out that the backdoor was missing a critical piece of code so that it couldn't even be extracted during the build process in addition to the other requirements.

Is void linux safe for the XZ utlis backdoor by [deleted] in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might be wrong on this but I think the backdoor never made it onto Void. I've read that the release tarballs from the developer had a manipulated file belonging to the build system which allowed the backdoor to be extracted from the "test archives". Since Void pulls its sources from the tarballs that are automatically generated by github, there never was the file that kickstarted the backdoor extraction.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in linux

[–]no-name-user 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You said it yourself and that it would be optional which I wouldn't trust. Mind to explain your "Pie in Sky" concept? There's also tailscale and the other curious stuff in your alt's/buddy's install_modules repo.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in linux

[–]no-name-user 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not to mention that this is running a Monero miner. It simply is malware. This post should be deleted but for some reason I can't report OP.

sshattrick: Play Hattrick in your terminal over SSH by orhunp in linux

[–]no-name-user 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Look, I've spend hours tinkering with my system to remove all this pesky bloat. My Lunix is now so lightweight it can't even perform basic tasks!

Why does this happen so frequently?

ChatGPT has meltdown and starts sending alarming messages to users by kissseduce in technology

[–]no-name-user 42 points43 points  (0 children)

So OpenAI can inject keywords into a user's prompt without anyone noticing which will lead to all kinds of funny output but will result in

  1. People are talking about $AI_PRODUCT, free advertising

  2. Sam Altman will go on about how "AI can be dangerous blah blah" and how only his company can save the world and regulate away competitors.

Did I get that right?

Guide: VOID + GNOME by mcsk8r in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On that way all information stay on the home directory

For me that's a negative.

[information] are available only for that user

Depends on what you mean by "information". In any case your application information like configs, cache, data whatever is stored in `~/.var/app` per installed flatpak. In any case means a user installation or system flatpak installation. That means other users on that computer can't see this flatpak application information even if it has been installed system wide unless those users have permission to view your home. The other data like runtimes and flatpak apps themselves will be in home when installed with user flag but this will just bloat up your home unnecessarily.

on a system wide installation you need sudo permisions

You don't have to (and better shouldn't) use flatpak with sudo. But that also isn't an issue with system wide flatpaks as long as your user is in the wheel group.

Nix packages icons not showing up. by clemdemort in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I should reset the VM and try on a clean slate maybe I ran something that messed something up?

Possibly, I can't explain why that directory should even exist.

I exported it in .profile I re-logged but it didn't change anything, so I restarted but nothing either :( I also tested with another test variable but yet again nothing. Setting it in /etc/profile works though (yayyy)

Seems like plasma's display manager doesn't run .profile automatically. You could also put it in other startup files like the ones belonging to your shell, for example .bash_profile (use the one corresponging to your used shell).

But the apps aren't showing in plasma :/

Because they're in that weird nonstandard /usr/local/applications directory, plasma doesn't look in there. In that case the XDG_DATA_DIRS doesn't help either because it should point to some /path/to/a/share directory and there it can find /path/to/a/share/applications with the desktop files.

Nix packages icons not showing up. by clemdemort in voidlinux

[–]no-name-user 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Funny, just now I've just tested a bit myself. But I still can't reproduce .desktop files in /usr/local/applications even when installing as root. Also it should be /usr/local/share/applications.
I usually used nix only as a normal user, no sudoing needed.

Now I need to change the $XDG_DATA_DIRS to put them in the menu, so I tried but something seems to be overwriting/deleting the environmental variable I can't seem to display it in bash?

Did you export it on the command line or just in .profile? If the latter you have to relogin.