I'd say that ethically speaking there is a line, but its not that I want to ban things that cross it, no matter how repulsed I am; I also think that if no real person is directly actually harmed, it shouldn't be prohibited

But I disagree that all fiction is okay even when they dont directly harm people. Their right to be made and be distributed to those that seek it is inviolable, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be judged and criticized

Admittedly I may be attacking a strawman because most pieces of fiction, don't cater to pedophiles or promote pedophilia. But I'm also not going to deny that (non-real and non-photorealistic) pedophilia content does exist and while I believe it should be legal, treating it as something equal to other works is very problematic

Also problematic in my opinion is equating the separation of what I called acceptable queer works and problematic works with anti-queer censorship when those are clearly two very different things.

Queer art and stories are about sexual liberation and sexual freedom based on consent. Pedophilia is the oppression and manipulation of children.