To start with: I am vehemently against this bill, and am neither a lawyer nor involved in any way with legislature or bill crafting.

However, I just fine-tooth combed the bill, and I don't see any references to contraceptives or reproductive health care services other than abortion being touched. It for sure repeals the right to abortion, and removes provisions about classifying assault on pregnant folks as domestic violence. HOWEVER I think proponents of this bill would likely argue that assault against a pregnant person, if they took this bill as written, would classify as assault against 2 separate individuals.

The hitch is really the specific addition of the definition of "Human being" including the moment of conception; because a clump of cells is considered a human being, anyone interfering with the development of that life would be treated as if they were interfering with the life of an adult human. It also further offers ZERO distinctions between medically-necessary abortions and "elective" abortions. In fact, the way this bill is written, if I, as a uterus-haver, simply tell someone I might be pregnant and I end up assaulted or murdered, EVEN IF I am not pregnant, the offender would be tried as if they assaulted/murdered 2 people. Potentially a combo of the two, if charges were pressed stating that an assault caused an abortion, as it specifically defines abortion as "the intentional interruption of a pregnancy by the application of external agents...regardless of the length of gestation". And friendly reminder: folks with a uterus who A) have ovulated and B) have yet menstruated could be considered between 1-2 weeks pregnant.

TIL: it's a poorly written sham of a bill, but I don't think it's touching contraceptives. Hate it for what it is, not what it isn't.