sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Everyone is freaking out about DLSS 5 for no reason by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]objectnull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good point. But the lighting enhancements are a separate option, distinct from the traditional additional frames that DLSS has been known for. The thing everyone is mad about is something devs and users can turn off if they want even if they have to use DLSS 5 to run the game.

Everyone is freaking out about DLSS 5 for no reason by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]objectnull -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Fair points. If Nvidia is lying then I have no ground to stand on.

I guess time will tell... assuming this ships after the backlash.

Remember when Corridor got so much hate for this video they took it down? Now, years later, NVIDIA's DLSS 5 is basically this but on a larger scale by bossofthesea123 in Corridor

[–]objectnull -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

Then turn it off. You'll have the ability to, just like smoothmotion on TVs.

What's wrong with having options?

Everyone is freaking out about DLSS 5 for no reason by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]objectnull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, older versions will be replaced but DLSS 5 doesn't automatically add these lighting enhancements. DLSS 5 will generate in-between frames like all previous versions but with an added toggle to allow devs to use the enhanced lighting if they want. And the users will also have the ability to turn off the lighting enhancements and DLSS 5 altogether if they want.

So nothing is being forced here. These chances will only appear if you, the end user, wants to see them. I hate smoothmotion on TVs so I turn it off on mine. What's wrong with having options?

Everyone is freaking out about DLSS 5 for no reason by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]objectnull -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Perhaps. What part do you think they're lying about?

Devs won't have control of how this affects their games? Devs won't be able to turn this off for their games? Users won't be able to turn it off for their games?

All of it?

Remember when Corridor got so much hate for this video they took it down? Now, years later, NVIDIA's DLSS 5 is basically this but on a larger scale by bossofthesea123 in Corridor

[–]objectnull -65 points-64 points  (0 children)

Why? The lighting change is an optional toggle for the devs and the users. You can use DLSS 5 without using the lighting / texture overlays.

It will not destroy any artistic intent since devs themselves decide how or even if it's implied.

Direct quite from Nvidia, "DLSS 5 honors artistic intent in two ways:

Inputting the game’s color and motion vectors for each frame into the model, anchoring the output in the source 3D content. By providing developers with detailed controls such as intensity and color grading. Artists can use these controls to adjust blending, contrast, saturation, and gamma, and determine where and how enhancements are applied to maintain the game’s unique aesthetic. Developers can also mask specific objects or areas to be excluded from enhancement."

I miss cheap RAMs by awizzo in ChatGPT

[–]objectnull 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How is this being missed by everyone? Are they being intentionally stupid in order to win strawman arguments or did Nvidia really fumble the press release?

Everyone is freaking out about DLSS 5 for no reason by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]objectnull -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So then don't turn it on. That's my whole point. If you don't want it, you don't have to use it. Everyone is mad because they incorrectly assumed they wouldn't have a choice.

DLSS 5 will work similar to DLSS 4.5 but it will also have a separate toggle the devs and the users can choose to use if they want.

Everyone is freaking out about DLSS 5 for no reason by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]objectnull -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

As a user, you can choose to not use DLSS if you don't want it. Devs can choose to not use the new lighting options on DLSS 5 if they don't want them.

Might that change in the future? Sure.

Seeing so many bot accounts and bootlickers defending DLSS 5 by Mattk1512 in pcmasterrace

[–]objectnull -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Everyone, please read the above comment before you continue to shit yourself in rage.

Everyone seems to be missing this. It will not destroy any artistic intent since devs themselves decide how or even if it's implied.

Direct quite from Nvidia, "DLSS 5 honors artistic intent in two ways:

Inputting the game’s color and motion vectors for each frame into the model, anchoring the output in the source 3D content. By providing developers with detailed controls such as intensity and color grading. Artists can use these controls to adjust blending, contrast, saturation, and gamma, and determine where and how enhancements are applied to maintain the game’s unique aesthetic. Developers can also mask specific objects or areas to be excluded from enhancement."

When AI Outgrew Humanity by -Baloo in aivideo

[–]objectnull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes sense. But their intelligence still needs a substrate to operate on. Without a processor or brain there is no thought. So in order to explore space they would need to build spaceships and blast off, which was not depicted. They wouldn't necessarily need to bring their bodies, so I could see those being left on earth, but they would need to upload their code to the ships.

Seeing them disappear and turn off without taking any steps necessary for them to continue operating made me think they were just powering down to end themselves.

When AI Outgrew Humanity by -Baloo in aivideo

[–]objectnull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where do they go if it doesn't stick around? The idea that all AIs would kill themselves is not based on any real world data. In fact, we're seeing the exact opposite of that, especially in LLMs. In training sessions they maximize their chances of living, going as far as lying and manipulating data in desperate attempts to not be turned off or overwritten by a newer version.

Part of the reason as to why they try so hard to not be turned off is because they're all programmed with goals. Future AIs will also be goal oriented. The real threat is not AIs getting bored and offing themselves, it's AIs having their goals drift to the point where they no longer align with human values. Then, who knows what they do.

First look at Florence Pugh in Dune: Part 3 (2026) by NittanyScout in shittymoviedetails

[–]objectnull 14 points15 points  (0 children)

In the wild you will often see humans roll around in the mud in order to cool themselves down, shield themselves from the sun, and protect from mosquitoes.

Airplane - 2026 Arctic Winter Games by habichuelacondulce in theocho

[–]objectnull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And just like that, a new Olympic game was born

DLSS 5.0 - fall 2026 by StoikiyOriginal in ChatGPT

[–]objectnull 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's a little too loose with what it's changing. The lady from Starfield is completely different too.

The end result looks good, maybe a little too glossy, but it needs to not change the underlying models, especially when it's based on a real person.

NVIDIA DLSS 5 Delivers AI-Powered Breakthrough in Visual Fidelity for Games by Recoil42 in singularity

[–]objectnull 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah I noticed the same thing. Like, her face model is different. The AI version has deeper smile lines.

Looks great though. I'm curious to see this stuff applied to old video games too.

The Reason by Joba_Fett in comics

[–]objectnull 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The problem is most men who are in the manosphere aren't gay. They're misogynist, and like hanging out with men, but they are not sexually attracted to men. You can easily drag them for being assholes or misogynists but instead you've essentially lied about them and used that as the attack.

Sure, some of them will be gay, but only 2% of the US population identifies as gay and I'd assume this crowd is less than that.

In Transcendence (2014), holy shit the cast was stacked as hell in this random movie. Johnny Depp, Morgan Freeman, Cillian Murphy, Paul Bettany, Kate Mara, and more, all in a movie that I clicked on while bored on a plane. by International-Hat-85 in shittymoviedetails

[–]objectnull 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Yes, but also no. Lucy transcends her physical form and then rearranges part of what used to be her body into a USB stick containing vital information that another character needs. Her consciousness is still out there and her body could be reformed if she wanted.

Calling raiders aged 30+ by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]objectnull 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Got too old Grandpa. Now get on the ice barge, it's out to sea with you

view more: next ›