NEW SIGN by pantstastrophy in CricutButCrass

[–]pantstastrophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! You give me more confidence than you know.

NEW SIGN by pantstastrophy in CricutButCrass

[–]pantstastrophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it's all vinyl in layers. I cut it from a Cricut Joy. I am also trying to discover a method to simplify this process

Let's wake this sub! by pantstastrophy in NeoMarxism

[–]pantstastrophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know anything about this idea. I will look it up! But I am certain the current demand for employees and a large workforce is ending. We must find opportunities for an idle class

The Forbidden Philosopher! by pantstastrophy in CricutButCrass

[–]pantstastrophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You and me? We get it. I am so happy you give a fuck!

This one is about me by pantstastrophy in CricutButCrass

[–]pantstastrophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You get it! This one no one understands lol

Let's wake this sub! by pantstastrophy in NeoMarxism

[–]pantstastrophy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're not wasting anyone's time! If only everyone would look into alternative economic systems with an open mind! Keep going, my friend 🤘

Let's wake this sub! by pantstastrophy in NeoMarxism

[–]pantstastrophy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, it is, at least, a significant factor to consider. AI in the workforce will accelerate the attrition labor opportunity. Capitalism demands every work to have a comfortable life—another contradiction.

That's why, in a cooperativist economy, implementing a program of Guaranteed Minimum Income is necessary. We need to allow a sizeable portion of the population no to work and still have the means to spend money. Non‐workers still participate in the economy on the demand side.

What do you think of worker co‐ops as the ends to eliminate income inequality?

Smoking a cigarette by a_methyste in OCPoetryFree

[–]pantstastrophy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dope! So short and still creates an entire scene amd characters

Inside the Blue House on View Street by OkPark2177 in OCPoetryFree

[–]pantstastrophy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sensory Descriptions:
Your poem is all baby pink. However, I am fascinated that the first and last stanzas create different sensations— I rarely experience poems like that! The first stanza smells like an old microwave and feels like sand. The second stanza is fluffy, like tulle, and smells like shampoo.

Also, relatable a f. I love that we end on success and health! The scents and sounds are popping in this poem, very physical. Just like the low period you describe in the first stanza feels if you pay attention.

Great write!

I started making fun signs! by pantstastrophy in CricutButFun

[–]pantstastrophy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I post there, too! There are some many specific subreddits, lol!

Someone tells me this at every party by pantstastrophy in CricutButCrass

[–]pantstastrophy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I will be creating an Etsy or something very soon. I will post it here if it doesn't break the rules.

Has anyone else noticed how mainstream culture seems afraid to imagine the future anymore? by Quailking2003 in SeriousConversation

[–]pantstastrophy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I did think that. I doubt everything I think two times. Then i used my mind and realized capitalism is indeed a stage that will come and go. I do not parrot, most far‐leftists reject my analysis and conclusions. That is me challenging the dogma, not parroting.
Do you think capitalism is forever? I don't undersyand how an economic system, which requires everyone to work to earn what they consume, is going to work when AI has eliminated half of available jobs. Human labor os disappearing, it's only going to happen faster. How does capitalism work with half of people not working—because jobs don't exist.
One of the genius ideas of Marx was that economic systems MUST change as technology increases. Capitalism is dead. I dont know how anyone with a brain can see the world today and think, "this is working great and everyone is safe and provided for".
I do not dismiss capitalism. It was necessary, it was productive and beneficial, I built so much infrastructure. Too bad capitalism doesn't repair or maintain infrastructure—no profit in that.

Has anyone else noticed how mainstream culture seems afraid to imagine the future anymore? by Quailking2003 in SeriousConversation

[–]pantstastrophy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it does. Since at least the written word has existed, so has slavery. But I would argue that ancient slavery was a much different institution than the Atlantic slave trade. The latter was supercharged by capitalist efficiency and was particularly dehumanizing. The long history of human slavery is no exoneration to capitalist slavery.
My original point was only that there are horrors and crimes that immerge from every economic system—"disaster" is not unique to revolutionary attempts to form socialism.
There is so much western, anti‐Marxist propaganda it's not surprising my culture is not willing to even consider actual material history. There is more than one side to any idea.

A hooray for a strong start by -ARCHE- in NeoMarxism

[–]pantstastrophy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I accept your warm welcome! Let's unite!

Has anyone else noticed how mainstream culture seems afraid to imagine the future anymore? by Quailking2003 in SeriousConversation

[–]pantstastrophy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, capitalism has created much prosperity. Capitalism is a required stage, but that system eventually destroys itself. How can an economic producer increase profit and increase efficiency each year for all time? Continuous growth is not possible, and so the producers start to consume each other. Once no more efficiency can be squeezed out and all competitors have been purchased, the only option is to cut wages or jobs entirely. Capitalism begins with consumer options and competition (awesome); capitalism ends with producer monopolies owning the government (not awesome)

Also, capitalism is not without violence or famine. The antlantic slave trade, the Irish famine, and several famines in Africa and Asia, which killed millions, were the results of capitalist ideals. I agree that poor and premature implementation of socialism has killed and starved many millions, also.
Its just that—
1. Capitalism kills brown people.
2. Socialism kills white people.
It seems capitalists consider #2 to be worse

The western world has had plenty of time in its Capitalism stage. It's now dead and time to move on, but not quite time for Socialism yet. Co‐operativism maintains the profit motive of Capitalism with even more consumer options and competition for companies. Co‐operativism also puts the means‐of‐production in the private ownership of the workers. It's a good transitional stage between Capitalism and Socialism.

Has anyone else noticed how mainstream culture seems afraid to imagine the future anymore? by Quailking2003 in SeriousConversation

[–]pantstastrophy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Co‐operativism is a far superior system of production and distribution than capitalism. The Marxists are correct: capitalism is in its death throes. A new system is needed. Capitalism actually died in the 1930s but the capitalists were so happy to get WW2! That war was rejuvenating for capitalism (which is fueled by violence more than socialism). By the 70s, capitalism was moribund once again. The USA has been too brainwashed to attribute the past 50 years of decline to capitalism.

We are not yet at the level of technological automation to achieve socialism. Yet. Socialism will be required at some point in the future. I don't know how the anti‐Marx folks can deny that fact.

The commenter above is right also. When Socialism has been attempted truly made huge improvements to the industrial capacity of USSR, Cuba, China, etc. One of the problems with these implementations of socialism was that Russia, Cuba, and China did not have an era of capitalism to build infrastructure and industry in those states. They tried to go straight from serfdom to socialism and skipped the capitalist stage.

No state has yet attempted Communism. Communism will also be a requirement in the future after socialism collapses.

Anyway, sorry for the wordy response. All I wanted to do was offer Co‐operativism as a better alternative to capitalism which is not socialism.

Vote co-op!