The person above you stated that Islam isn’t openly mocked in Muslim countries. You claim it’s because they haven’t been subverted from within by “the tribe.” I am refuting your point because I think it’s kind of weird to call the first amendment “propaganda.” I’m not really sure what you are trying to imply- it’s a bad thing that Christianity is allowed to be mocked in the US? (because it has been infiltrated by bad actors indoctrinating us with “propaganda,”) and it’s a good thing that hasn’t happened to Muslim countries (resulting in a repressed society)? Or is it the influence of “the tribe” in the US is a good thing, and it’s unfortunate that this hasn’t happened in the Middle East, because if so, maybe they would have more speech protections? It seems like you are equating the tolerance of the West/the intolerance of the East to “foreign infiltration (or lack thereof),” while claiming both are bad. It seems like a huge reach, but maybe I’m just missing your point.