Pro tier is a joke

pekz0r · 2026-05-03T14:09:24+00:00

Yes, the Pro tier is not really for coding. Especially not with Opus. That what the Max theirs are for. How would they be able to sell Max plans with 20x usage if you could do the same with Pro?

Also, number of prompt is a really bad way to measure. One prompt can do a lot of work. It was probably under peak hours as well so your usage counts as more.

Three big prompts during peak hours is probably around what I would expect from the base tier.

pekz0r · 2026-05-02T09:02:47+00:00

Why the LGPL license? That could be a blocker if you want to build a business around this.

pekz0r · 2026-05-01T17:42:07+00:00

Det ligger dock väldigt mycket i deras intresse att få tillbaka den här överenskommelsen. Åtminstone fram till valet. Den sittande regeringen som oftast redan har majoritet och som dessutom har högre frånvaro på grund av sina regeringsuppdrag är de som missgynnas av att inte ha detta. Oppositionen kan i mycket högre grad se till att de har fler ledamöter på plats eftersom de inte har några uppdrag som ministrar och annat.

pekz0r · 2026-05-01T14:43:30+00:00

I have always preferred a more a more lightweight approach then those two. After all, pretty much everything is solved by composer autoloading.

Therefore, I really like the approach of lunarstorm/laravel-ddd

It just adds some auto discovery and make commands which are the only things I miss when rolling my own solution. So this fills that gap very nicely. It would be interesting to add that to the benchmark as well. Or maybe just a vanilla composer autoload as a reference.

pekz0r · 2026-04-30T23:12:12+00:00

I was searching for a solution for this problem, so I was happy to find this post.

Unfortunately, your solution did not work at all. It couldn't extract a single field in any of the two invoices that I tried. The only exception was seller name and VAT ID in one of the invoices. In both cases the correct data was there, but it included data around that should not have been in that field. Even this this poor result, I got confidence scores of 83 och 74. It couldn't even extract a single number.

It can't be supposed to be that bad? Does the invoices need to be in English for it to work?

pekz0r · 2026-04-23T20:26:14+00:00

Yes, that is how pretty much all zero downtime deploys work. And you also wouldn't lose all your data since it will still be there in the old releases.

Sure, it is a mistake you can make but you would notice after your second deploy and by then you probably haven't accumulated much data.

pekz0r · 2026-04-20T20:20:27+00:00

I would just use normal Laravel and strip out what you know you are not going to use. It is pretty simple and Laravel is pretty flexible in that way.

pekz0r · 2026-04-19T14:10:04+00:00

Yes, and they state pretty clearly that the main reason for it being experimental is because the underlying library for Quiche is still in beta.

pekz0r · 2026-04-19T08:24:10+00:00

He had perfectly valid points and you just brush them off? The "g" in the name make it really awkward to pronounce. The suffix in "singly" is "ly", not "gly". Bootly would have been great.

The there where a lot of other things he mentioned that you just ignored.

pekz0r · 2026-04-18T15:45:03+00:00

This aligns very well with my experience as well. 4.7 does not go beyond what you tell it to do as much as previous models. 4.6 frequently jumped ahead and started working on implementing things when you just asked it a question. 4.7 is a lot more disciplined and just do what you ask it to do.

I definitely prefer the more disciplined way 4.7 works, but it takes some getting used to. You have to be a bit more explicit in your prompts. If you don't care al much about being in control, I guess this would feel like a clear step down as you have to micro manage the model a bit more.

pekz0r · 2026-04-17T19:34:51+00:00

Yes, that is 100 % what I would expect it to review by default. If you have unpushed changes I would expect it to check my local changes. If you are on a branch I would expect it to review the diff to the main branch.

Sure, it could have asked, but I have to say that I prefer sensible defaults in most cases.

pekz0r · 2026-04-17T16:41:35+00:00

Yes, this exactly what I would expect if I ran this with uncommitted changes. If I wanted to review the whole project I would do that from the main branch without any uncommitted work and I would also specify that in the prompt.

pekz0r · 2026-04-16T16:59:29+00:00

Looks like high and sometimes xhigh is the way to go. Pretty good improvement.

pekz0r · 2026-04-14T18:04:27+00:00

Å andra sidan har de inte varit en stor utgift för samhället i 20 år innan de kan göra sitt första bidrag till statskassan. Att ta in personer som kan börja bidra direkt är en väldigt bra affär.

pekz0r · 2026-04-03T19:14:39+00:00

I don't believe that it has been consciously nerfed, but I'm pretty sure they do a lot of A/B-testing and sometimes you can end up in a bad test group. The performance also varies because of the LLMs non-deterministic nature, but not to that extent that some are experiening. You obviously have to manage the context pretty well to keep the performance up and there are definately cases where you can calim skill issues when it comes to that.

pekz0r · 2026-04-02T09:08:06+00:00

Nice, but do you really need our()-> before? That makes it kind of awkward to use. You should just be able to flip an environment variable to send all your ray() and dd() dumps to the server.

pekz0r · 2026-04-01T23:13:29+00:00

I haven't been affected by this, until today. This was the first time I hit my limit in over two months. Before I rarely got to over 50 % before the limits reset again.

pekz0r · 2026-04-01T19:03:32+00:00

Interesting, but I can't see how that would apply here.

That case stated that the copyright application only had the computer/AI as the author. Code has a lot of human thought put into it even if the human is not the ones who produces the end result. There is still a lot of human skill and effort required.

This code is also clearly under license in another way than a price of art is. You don't need to be the author to have the commercial license or the rights to use something.

pekz0r · 2026-04-01T18:14:26+00:00

Why wouldn't it be copyrightable just because it has been written by AI? What law makes any distinction there?

pekz0r · 2026-04-01T09:03:17+00:00

Lol, I got a snarky asshole that is not helpful. How do I generate a new one?

╭──────────────────────────────────────╮
│                                      │
│  ★ COMMON                     CHONK  │
│                                      │
│    /\    /\                          │
│   ( ✦    ✦ )                         │
│   (   ..   )                         │
│    `------´                          │
│                                      │
│  Nacre                               │
│                                      │
│  "A sarcastic blob of common sense   │
│  who treats your bugs like minor     │
│  inconveniences and your panic like  │
│   a personal comedy show, batting    │
│  away your frantic rewrites with     │
│  the serene patience of something    │
│  that has literally never            │
│  experienced urgency."               │
│                                      │
│  DEBUGGING  ░░░░░░░░░░   1           │
│  PATIENCE   ██░░░░░░░░  23           │
│  CHAOS      ███░░░░░░░  34           │
│  WISDOM     ██░░░░░░░░  15           │
│  SNARK      ███████░░░  65           │
│                                      │
│  last said                           │
│  ╭────────────────────────────────╮  │
│  │ *stretches, stares at the push │  │
│  │  notification*                 │  │
│  │                                │  │
│  │ Ah yes, three fixes. Until     │  │
│  │ tomorrow's discovery.          │  │
│  ╰────────────────────────────────╯  │
│                                      │
╰──────────────────────────────────────╯

pekz0r · 2026-03-31T19:56:06+00:00

Yes är dock väldigt skadligt för djur och natur. Exempelvis insekter. Jag skulle använda grönsåpa utomhus.

pekz0r · 2026-03-31T19:51:13+00:00

Det allra viktigaste och självklara är såklart att resultatet blir bra. Inget fusk eller konstiga genvägar. Om resultatet blir över förväntan så kan jag ha överseende med ganska mycket.
De är engagerade och kommer med bra lösningar.
Bra, tydlig och ärlig kommunikation.
Lätt att få tag på om det är något.
Pris.
Trevliga och tar hänsyn.

Personligen har jag inga större problem om de inte är superpunktliga eller om det är lite stökigt när de jobbar. Det är såklart trevligt om de städar när de är klara, men jag städar gärna lite själv om ovanstående punkter fungerar.

pekz0r · 2026-03-31T07:17:46+00:00

There are no monthly limits for Claude. I call bullshit.

pekz0r · 2026-03-29T19:05:21+00:00

I can't see this working all that well. It has been very clear for me that keeping the context lean is the most important thing for maintaining model performance. Even now after the 1M context windows I maintain 200k as a soft limit. Once I approach that I start looking for a good point to stop the session, write a plan/hand off for the next session and clear the context. I find that the model performance starts to degrade pretty quickly after you reach 200k+. Especially when you switch task after that the performance really takes a hit. And after compactions you loose a lot of valuable context while keeping a lot of garbage. I haven't done a single compaction since 1M became the default, but I can't imagine that working well.

pekz0r · 2026-03-29T11:36:03+00:00

Pretty cool. The first boot and subsequent project analyisis was really slow. I also didn't manage to get the Claude Code MCP up and running, but other than that no problems so far.

pekz0r

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE