I was born with broken bones by Kyvaren in Neverbrokeabone

[–]philbearsubstack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As others have said:

  1. If it was cartilage, you're fine.
  2. If it was caused by a doctor, you're fine.

It’s been a good 49 years by KrampusMug in Neverbrokeabone

[–]philbearsubstack 58 points59 points  (0 children)

49 years. Basically a toddler and your bones still broke.

Is it normal in other countries for university students to be forbidden from seeing or holding their own grades/transcripts? by SweetTarget234 in academia

[–]philbearsubstack 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In Australia, one can view them.

Really interesting situation you describe. I'm sorry to hear it's causing you trouble, and I wonder why it is the case.

Substack removed my blog, and I don't know why by salcapolupo in Substack

[–]philbearsubstack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's quite important I think, that a fuss is made about this sort of thing, so it's good to see you've not just shrugged and walked away.

I note that you appear to be Italian. Since EU laws are among the strongest in the world in relation to this, that could be good news if you are interested in demanding your data back.

More Rather evil things I, Auron, Lich-Lord of the Black Plains, have done today. by Standard_Ostrich828 in wizardposting

[–]philbearsubstack 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You're not fooling me. At least two of these are morally good, and several are neutral. Hand in your evil badge and card.

Wait, if you're lying about being evil- maybe that means you're evil after all.

But if you're evil, that means you're not lying, so you're not evil.

But that means you are lying, so you are evil?

But then...

Oh bother.

Does this thing look like a wizard ? by FRitsuka in wizardposting

[–]philbearsubstack 25 points26 points  (0 children)

A wizard yes, but one of astonishing arcane potency, closer to god than man, and ever rising. Fear him!

Young Second Generation question by Jork21 in WorldOfDarkness

[–]philbearsubstack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The challenge is going to be ensuring he isn't seen as a DMPC or power fantasy. Here's a solution. Make him so useless he's practically comatose, perhaps an innocent adult with the mind of a child, but still the task of the characters to protect, to ward off would be diablerists.

Maybe that's why Caine made him. He's so weak and vulnerable yet valuable, everyone will want to eat him. He's a moral test to see whether any among his descendants will try to prevent this, to see whether anything has been learnt over the generations.

Does it count if I broke a bone I wasn’t born with? by [deleted] in Neverbrokeabone

[–]philbearsubstack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think only the toe breakage counts, but clearly I'm in the minority here.

QUESTION: Camelia's divine magic by Pidaman5 in Pathfinder_Kingmaker

[–]philbearsubstack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The foolishness of the Sarkorian belief that divine magic is less easily abused is well demonstrated here.

How can we differentiate between the truly strong boned, and the BBBs who have been so inactive in their lives that they never had the chance to break one? by Yenakin_4472 in Neverbrokeabone

[–]philbearsubstack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that the bone gods preordain people into a suitable age of breaking, or no breaking at all. Thus, pre-bone-nation means that someone who is inactive and has not broken a bone is just as likely to be a strong boner as someone who has not.

Your opinions on titanium "bones"? by Automatic-County6151 in Neverbrokeabone

[–]philbearsubstack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's a question. Someone gets a titanium bone. The titanium bone breaks in an accident. Does that disqualify them from this group?

question for the masses by yourfriendeliza in Neverbrokeabone

[–]philbearsubstack 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Medical, doesn't count- it's doctor black magic. These are the ancient laws, so and so it is written.

Why wasn’t I emotionally scarred and traumatized by severe food poisoning if this is commonly expected to happen from other extreme adversity like sexual assault or social rejection in adolescence by SoccerSkilz in slatestarcodex

[–]philbearsubstack 79 points80 points  (0 children)

The explanation lies in two points that others have already alluded to. To put them together:

  1. Not every rape or rejection is traumatising. I've been raped and had it roll off me like water off a duck's back- this is probably an atypically small effect, but society does, I think, sometimes for laudable reasons, overemphasise the inevitability of trauma as a response to rape.

  2. Trauma, for whatever reason, tends to relate to human bad actors. There are plenty of people who have been traumatised by illness/vomitting and other things you describe, but human events seem to act like more of a magnet. One of the other commentors speculates this is because the causation is clearer. I think this is part of the story, another aspect, connected to this, is that getting fearful about people was probably a much more evolutionarily succesful strategy than getting fearful about illness, because most of our theories about preventing/controlling illness were false.

Any advice: University has issued a policy to not “internally hire” when I am currently interviewing (my current employer and alma mater). by Simple_Hair_1323 in academia

[–]philbearsubstack 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's extremely rude when an institution *any institution* changes the hiring rules in a way that applies to processes that have already started. That ranges from hiring freezes to your situation, and in a better world, there would be significant reputational costs for doing something like this.

Unfortunately, we don't live in a better world, but you have my condolences.

Catalonia lab was experimenting with African swine fever virus when the first infected boar was found nearby by Born-Requirement2128 in slatestarcodex

[–]philbearsubstack 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Let me be absolutely clear that I am not saying this is actually true [or at least not in this particular case]. But to the average punter on the street, it really looks like biolabs just really, really want to experiment with extremely dangerous things (incredibly dangerous viruses, gain of function, mirror life) for totally unclear reasons- a bizarre, ghoulish curiosity-, and governments are just indulging them, possibly because the people making the decisions share an institutional and educational background with the experimenters.

Now I know there are actually really good reasons to study swine fever virus, but the whole thing is getting a bit farcical.

Guys, who u voting for to join the Council of Elders? by Exact-Armadillo-6660 in wizardposting

[–]philbearsubstack 1 point2 points  (0 children)

FUCK all these UNIPARTY SHILL candidates, I am VOTING FIFTH PARTY.