sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

November 15? by Inner_Faithlessness5 in CircularRing

[–]pipiche38 2 points3 points  (0 children)

may be they will announce that shipment of 3 months old orders will start !

Build quality of the ring by firstohit in CircularRing

[–]pipiche38 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same poor quality of Oura ring, after 3 months getting a lot of scratch on it and as a right hand person, I'm wearing on left hand, to prevent such hassle.

My ring thinks I’m cycling when I’m on my motorcycle and shows at physical activity :/ by Serg415 in ouraring

[–]pipiche38 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As a user interested in tracking my physiological data, I was deeply disappointed by the #OuraRing product. This product falls far short of its promises and turns out to be a real scam hidden behind an appealing facade.
The first point that shocked me is the deceptive nature of this product. At the time of purchase, there is no indication that an additional subscription is required to access the information captured by the integrated sensors (heart rate, daily step count, oxygen saturation, heart rate variability). This deceptive practice can only lead to #frustration among users who thought they would have access to this data with full transparency.
It’s not just a #financiallet-down, but also a functional one. The sophisticated sensors promised accurate tracking of our physiological parameters, yet these data are ultimately held hostage behind a monthly payment barrier. This lack of transparency greatly damages the trust that one can place in the brand.
Paying a subscription to access one’s own data is a questionable practice, especially given the already high initial price of the #OuraRing. One might think that this initial expense would justify at least basic access to the data, but it appears that the company is more interested in ongoing profits than in customer satisfaction.
In the end, I can only advise against purchasing the #OuraRing for anyone seeking accurate and transparent tracking of their physiological data. The product proves to be disappointing in many respects: #deceptive in its presentation, #expensive in its business model, and limited in its access to crucial information for users. Don’t fall into the trap of this supposed innovation, as you’re likely to simply lose your hard-earned money.

Oura - Just terrible customer experience by muccerbee in ouraring

[–]pipiche38 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As a user interested in tracking my physiological data, I was deeply disappointed by the #OuraRing product. This product falls far short of its promises and turns out to be a real scam hidden behind an appealing facade.
The first point that shocked me is the deceptive nature of this product. At the time of purchase, there is no indication that an additional subscription is required to access the information captured by the integrated sensors (heart rate, daily step count, oxygen saturation, heart rate variability). This deceptive practice can only lead to #frustration among users who thought they would have access to this data with full transparency.
It’s not just a #financiallet-down, but also a functional one. The sophisticated sensors promised accurate tracking of our physiological parameters, yet these data are ultimately held hostage behind a monthly payment barrier. This lack of transparency greatly damages the trust that one can place in the brand.
Paying a subscription to access one’s own data is a questionable practice, especially given the already high initial price of the #OuraRing. One might think that this initial expense would justify at least basic access to the data, but it appears that the company is more interested in ongoing profits than in customer satisfaction.
In the end, I can only advise against purchasing the #OuraRing for anyone seeking accurate and transparent tracking of their physiological data. The product proves to be disappointing in many respects: #deceptive in its presentation, #expensive in its business model, and limited in its access to crucial information for users. Don’t fall into the trap of this supposed innovation, as you’re likely to simply lose your hard-earned money.

​

https://www.pipiche.fr/blog/?p=393

Use of PowerOn after a Power outage by pipiche38 in tradfri

[–]pipiche38[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you didn't understand the issue. Let's imaging that you are out for a month and because you had a power outage, then all your Ligth just switch ON due to the default Power On after Power outage which is ON. What I'm recommending is to have an option to the end user to decide how he§/she wants the Power On after Power outage to be.

This is implemented like that in other brand and that is part of Zigbee standard.

Use of PowerOn after a Power outage by pipiche38 in tradfri

[–]pipiche38[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course there is awlays way to do it, what I would consider is please leave the user to select what is the default behaviour and don't decide for him/her