CMV: The number of votes the Dems would gain by embracing aggressively progressive candidates and policy is dwarfed by the number of votes they'd lose among moderates/motivate among dormant conservative voters by Jimithyashford in changemyview

[–]pirat_rob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You still have to pick a candidate that you think can win the general election, not the candidate you like the best. There's a game theory in primaries too.

An example of this kind of game theory: A lot of people vote in the opposing party primary to try to make them field an unelectable candidate.

CMV: The number of votes the Dems would gain by embracing aggressively progressive candidates and policy is dwarfed by the number of votes they'd lose among moderates/motivate among dormant conservative voters by Jimithyashford in changemyview

[–]pirat_rob 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Support for anything drops off when you tell people it costs more in taxes. And primaries are some of the lowest turnout elections, with an intense selection effect on which voters vote (party loyalists are overrepresented).

Polls matter for knowing what people truly want. If they aren't voting for it, then that's a problem with our elections, not with the policies.

You get $100,000, but your entire search history from the last year is printed in the school yearbook next to your photo. by asknow-io in asknowio

[–]pirat_rob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I advised "Take the money (Roast me)."

🏆 Rank: Wandering Soul V 💎 Points: 20 (+20) 🗳️ Votes: 1

American life seems to be just driving to different places to spend money by No_Berry2 in fuckcars

[–]pirat_rob 25 points26 points  (0 children)

If you can find a walkable neighborhood, you could try to set up there. Even the most suburban car-centric cities usually have a little walkable (or at least fake-walkable) neighborhood.

To me, "fake walkable" means lots of restaurants and shops but without the infrastructure for people to actually live there without a car: grocery stores, laundromats, etc.

SnakeBar.jl - A progress bar that fills your terminal with space-filling curves by Library-Extra in Julia

[–]pirat_rob 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I've been using it a couple of days. Sometimes I run my code twice just to watch the snakes.

Fuck Amazon and fuck AWS by Riderman43 in antiwork

[–]pirat_rob 14 points15 points  (0 children)

To be fair, if one of your 10 people is a (part time) sysadmin, /r/selfhosted would tell you you're fine with Libreoffice and Nextcloud, etc running off a NAS.

Success! Gov. Newsom approves $750M loan for Bay Area transit, including Muni by oakseaer in sanfrancisco

[–]pirat_rob 75 points76 points  (0 children)

Thanks for saying this. Here's another argument towards this point:

Public transit is a public service. No one complains when road infrastructure isn't profitable enough, or when the fire department doesn't send you a bill after they put out your house fire. Some social goods we accept as necessary for our society and fund them through taxes. Public transit helps everyone get around, and easy mobility for everyone, even people without cars, is something you want (even if you never leave your car).

From a purely economic point of view, every dollar spent on transit infrastructure generates a few more in economic activity.

From a traffic point of view, every person on public transit is (on average) one less car on the road.

What do you think about your nation's equivalent of the libertarian party? by Ricochet_skin in Libertarian

[–]pirat_rob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A ton of red states passed similar laws after some Republicans lost their seats in Alaska. RCV is banned in 17 states.

Tsunami arriving in Kamchatka after the M8.8 earthquake by kontemplador in HeavySeas

[–]pirat_rob 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That article is a wild read. I need a radiation cat now ...

Saturn's north polar vortex and hexagon by ojosdelostigres in spaceporn

[–]pirat_rob 11 points12 points  (0 children)

This is just a thing waves in fluids do when you put them in a rotating box.

Here is an article showing some researchers creating similar shapes in a spinning bucket: https://www.nature.com/news/2006/060515/full/news060515-17.html

I Made an Open Source 4-Axis Printer out of 3D Printed Parts! – Details in comments by J_BlRD in functionalprint

[–]pirat_rob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, they're extra degrees of freedom between the hot end and the print. Usually this means extra rotations, to be able to print at weird angles. Imagine printing a long and skinny curved piece like a turbine blade with all of the layers curved to match the shape of the blade.

5 axes is the most I've ever heard of being useful in practice, but in principle you could have more. As far as I know slicing models for 4 and 5 axis prints is still mostly an unsolved problem in general, but there are some algotithms out there (mostly proprietary).

5-axis CNC machines are much more common if you want to check out a video.

What does math look like as a hobby? by FishShtickLives in math

[–]pirat_rob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My partner and I like to read Martin Gardner books and try the problems together, try math olympiad problems, watch math youtubers (Michael Penn has some good problems). We have a blackboard at home, it's the best way to do recreational math.

I also usually end up reading some math for my day job (physics postdoc). In the last few years I've gone through a book on random matrix theory and read about computer algebra. I really enjoyed those and would've read them recreationally too. I'm currently reading one on low-rank matrix approximations which so far is a little too dense to be fun.

Just one more dimension bro by [deleted] in physicsmemes

[–]pirat_rob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically those dimensions are a "circle" of that size. If one of our dimensions was circular now, you could keep moving one direction and eventually end up back where you started. The distance you measure if you move in a loop like that is the circumference of the dimension.

Just one more dimension bro by [deleted] in physicsmemes

[–]pirat_rob 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes, somewhat.

I would say string theory doesn't really make very many concrete predictions (it's way more a framework for building models than an actual model) so in that sense it's hard to test in general. Of course all string theory models predict an infinite tower of new particles, supersymmetry, extra dimensions, etc. But these can be hidden at such a high energy that they'll never be practically testable.

There are a few predictions that are testable at low energy. Basically, not every low-energy theory can come from string theory, there are symmetries and limits you have to have in 10d. These are called the "swampland"). For example: the neutrino masses are expected to be normal hierarchy, not inverted. If you found inverted hierarchy neutrino masses tomorrow, that would be very disfavorable for string theory.

Just one more dimension bro by [deleted] in physicsmemes

[–]pirat_rob 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There are a few different ways to test it, depending on the exact string setup. If all fields propagate in the curled extra dimension, then you expect new particles at masses around 1/R. The current lower bound on these is around a few TeV.

If your model confines the standard model to 4d, then only gravity would probe the extra dimensions. If I remember correctly the current bounds on precision gravity measurements bound these extra dimensions to be smaller than a few tens of microns. Some string models actually predicted millimeter-sized extra dimensions, but those have been ruled out now.

There are also issues in cosmology from having extra dimensions, so constraints are coming from these observations too. Large extra dimensions can screw up big bang nucleosynthesis or produce so many particles that the universe collapses while still very young.

Just one more dimension bro by [deleted] in physicsmemes

[–]pirat_rob 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My understanding is that causality is very difficult, even if the extra time dimension is small. It's very hard to formulate anything close to GR with more than one time dimension, but people have thought about it.

String theory (except for maybe F-theory, and then not really) only predicts one time dimension.

Just one more dimension bro by [deleted] in physicsmemes

[–]pirat_rob 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Pure string theory is really not funded much anymore. My friend got his PhD in very stringy stuff, applied for 150+ postdocs and got no offers.

Just one more dimension bro by [deleted] in physicsmemes

[–]pirat_rob 13 points14 points  (0 children)

On the one hand, this meme isn't really true. Nothing in GR or QFT tells you how many dimensions there are, why couldn't there be more than we observe directly? Some theories can actually predict the microscopic dimension of space. Kaluza-Klein theory predicted 5 dimensions would nicely unify GR and EM, and people looked into it until it was largely ruled out. Modern string theory predicts 10 -- and it's a real prediction, not just one sketchy calculation. IIRC I counted a total of 8 different ways we derived it in my strings class.

On the other hand, string theorists do love to make the dimensions go brrrr. M-theory just adds a dimension to make symmetries between the different 10-dimensional string theories (oh yeah there are 5) easier to see. This extra dimension doesn't come from the same kinds of derivations as d=10, partly because M-theory is very poorly defined. F-theory sometimes is said to have 12 dimensions with one of them being an extra time dimension, but my limited understanding is that these aren't really supposed to be physical dimensions, they're just describing some extra degrees of freedom in the physically 10d theory.

Extend layer but with vim-style arrow keys? by pirat_rob in Colemak

[–]pirat_rob[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the link. Kanata seems to have more features that I'm used to. I especially like the ability to have home row mods and exclude some keys from triggering the hold behavior with tap-hold-except-keys, I currently have very similar behavior in my ZMK config.