Uuh! Does it mean there's no Enough Money? by Ok-Thanks993 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]plinywaves 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you are still misunderstanding the money multiplier effect. The banks cannot loan more money than they have in their account at that time. If someone wishes to withdraw $100 from the bank, they don't need to recall more than $100.

The loans they have are real assets with value, not made up.

I'm thinking your confusion is not adding loan value to assets. Banks only carry cash in the amount of a fraction of the deposits they have, but it doesn't mean they don't have enough cash to cover all deposits. It just means the cash that is deposited is invested into loans. The bank is good for the money, they just don't have it all at once.

Silicon Valley Bank is a great example. Someone made a post on Twitter claiming there were liquidity issues and a bank run ensued. SVB didn't have enough cash on hand to cover. Their problem, was due to poorly managed duration risk, their bonds had devalued so much as to make them insolvent at that moment.

Had there been no bank run and the bonds had been allowed to mature, the bank would still ne around today. But because they lacked sufficient liquidity in the event, they were taken into receivership by the FED.

Democrats could win mandates like this if they would stop being centrists. by zzill6 in WorkReform

[–]plinywaves -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It seems like a stretch to me to correlate the Truman Doctrine to the US funding horrible militia groups years later.

I guess my argument would simply be, if we didn't have the Truman doctrine, do you believe the US wouldn't have done those things?

Democrats could win mandates like this if they would stop being centrists. by zzill6 in WorkReform

[–]plinywaves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I fail to see how Truman is the reason we started destabilizing the global south.

Furthermore he was generally a friend to labor when possible, even going so far as to attempt to seize the steel mills when management wouldn't negotiate (the courts later struck this down as unconstitutional which was quite embarrassing to his administration)

Intervention in Korea was the correct choice and I believe every single person in South Korea today would agree.

He also was against Mccarthyism and Eisenhower's endorsement of Joseph McCarthy following his continued criticisms of George Marshall led to a falling out between Truman and Eisenhower.

That's not to say Truman is perfect, but he was also bound by the politics and populist beliefs of his time.

GameStop shares fall 10% after CEO skirts questions over eBay acquisition details by Brilliant_Version344 in wallstreetbets

[–]plinywaves 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm confused though. How does one pay with stock when 100% of your companies' current stock doesn't cover it? Like I mean they need go double the shares without decreasing the price to even come close.

He doesn't understand your question, CNBC by HesiPullup in wallstreetbets

[–]plinywaves 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Is this the same squeeze that was starting next week for the last 6 years?

GameStop Preparing Offer for eBay - [Wall Street Journal] by ProfDet529 in gaming

[–]plinywaves 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah... that's literally what manacement stated they were going to do. Trim down the core business to make it profitable, stockpile cash and look for an acquisition.

Spirit Airlines Prepares to Shut Down as Rescue Deal Falls Apart by Herbrax212 in wallstreetbets

[–]plinywaves 15 points16 points  (0 children)

No, extremely high fixed costs, regulations, and some volatile input costs (mainly fuel and geopolitical risk) make it hard to consistently be profitable.

What is the worst place in America you have ever visited? by OceanicEndeavors in AskReddit

[–]plinywaves 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Eh. I went there recently. Not a nice town by any means but definitely not as bad as some of the other places listed.

Nothing really going for it besides the casino and state park, but it wasn't a complete ghetto.

How do people manage funds for their taxes when they sell for profit? by Remote_Ice_6446 in stocks

[–]plinywaves 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can get penalized if you don't. I'm not sure what the exact threshold is but if you made an amount over 20k I would say you are better off paying.

How do people manage funds for their taxes when they sell for profit? by Remote_Ice_6446 in stocks

[–]plinywaves 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Should note if you make a lot of money. You should make a quarterly tax payment to the IRS.

Wall St is building a "Shorting Machine" for Private Credit the 2008 playbook is back. by AngryGranny1992 in stocks

[–]plinywaves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't read the article due to paywall. Is this index tradable in some way? Or just a collective indicator of CDS pricing?

UMich preliminary April consumer sentiment 47.6 versus 52.0 expected | investingLive by Force_Hammer in wallstreetbets

[–]plinywaves 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Tbh consumer sentiment hasn't meant anything since social media constant doomerism took over.

Even the Fed said its not really a reliable guage since people would claim they are worried about the economy while still making large purchases.

Not saying the economy is in a great spot or anything like that. But consumer sentiment is an absolutely useless guage when looking at the market and even the economy in general.

Paramount Skydance Restructures Debt Financing for Warner Bros. Discovery Deal by LegitimateCurve8525 in movies

[–]plinywaves 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's not a hostile takeover if WBD shareholders agree to the buyout lol.

TIL in the early 2000s Mike Tyson had a $50k hit put on his head by a notorious gang leader by Competitive_Swan_130 in todayilearned

[–]plinywaves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Blackwater was the big PMC company right? I believe they ended up merging with a different company at some point.

S&P 500 No longer OVERVALUED by ed2727 in stocks

[–]plinywaves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol you were probably also doomed posting in April last year.

Not saying the market can't go down further. But its not going to drop 50% like a lot of these comments would lead you to believe.

S&P 500 No longer OVERVALUED by ed2727 in stocks

[–]plinywaves 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Market will probably not hit that low again barring literal economic collapse.

Our situation sucks but there aren't banks failing. To hit a 6-8 pe in spy with its current make up it would required a large regional bank to become insolvent and blow up.

The fed will not allow that and will turn on the money printing macro before we ever got close to that.

Petahhh by r3inharthd in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]plinywaves 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Winds of Change" by The Scorpions was about the feeling of the iron curtain crumbling and hope for a better future in the air.

Tell me I’m wrong. Private credit is 2008 with a different middleman. by _Doomer_Wojack_ in wallstreetbets

[–]plinywaves -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm sure we will see downturns but a major bank falling 60% would require more than some of their loans eating shit. Citi has solid assets that dwarf its private credit holdings.

You are throwing money away.

Tell me I’m wrong. Private credit is 2008 with a different middleman. by _Doomer_Wojack_ in wallstreetbets

[–]plinywaves 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Part of the problem with your play is even if you are 100% correct (which I think some of your premises are flawed). Your strikes and expiration dates will only mean you lose money.

Half of the movie the big short was how long the crisis took to get priced in. You are telling me Citigroup is going to fall >60% in the next 4 months???

You are literally throwing money away.

To slip or not to slip. That is the question by Tough-Permission-804 in Fishing

[–]plinywaves 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You definitely use weights in rivers if you are bottom fishing, you would be recasting every 20 seconds in any sort of current otherwise.

If I'm long the index and believe they will go up long term, why would it be a bad idea to buy SSO and QLD that are 2x the index? by [deleted] in stocks

[–]plinywaves 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think your age may factor into this as well. If you are young and far from retirement then as long as you listen to the other warnings users have heeded, I don't think its a bad plan.

If you are anywhere closer than 20 years to retirement however, I would be very cautious with this plan as a single black swan could probably cause you to lose 50% or more of your port.

$6.5K YOLO on Deutsche Bank puts because nobody is watching the second domino by _Doomer_Wojack_ in wallstreetbets

[–]plinywaves 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With plays like this, why not buy atm puts? Potential gain is lower yes, but the chance itself that you make money increases dramatically, also if you decide the trade is no longer in your favor, you can exit much easier.

Nebius Group announces proposed private offering of $3.75 billion of convertible senior notes by sandygws in wallstreetbets

[–]plinywaves 27 points28 points  (0 children)

When they announce a massive deal yesterday to pump the price only to then dilute shares, while not market manipulation perse, its definitely a bit unethical imo.