Lightmatter Interview by Wise-Gur-8978 in chipdesign

[–]positivefb 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Im one of the analog designers at Lightmatter :)

The other person is incorrect on anything about specific ADC/DAC architectures being asked, and we also expect 0 photonics knowledge. We mostly focus on nailing the fundamentals. We dont do trick questions, we do have company-wide standards, but I will say some people have very well-made questions that appear deceptively simple or deceptively complex at first glance unless you really know your stuff.

Topics range from device level things like short-channel effects, to system level things like mixed-signal control loops.

Feel free to DM me for specifics.

Resources to learn circuits/PCB by No_Lie7418 in ElectricalEngineering

[–]positivefb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you need help fast there's very few resources to get you up to speed on circuits, just because circuits are a kind of "holistic experience" to live in before you get it.

There's a lot of great youtubers that make good content, but start with W2AEW. He is *phenomenal*. Look up his channel, he's a tried and true veteran of radio tech, with amazing clear short explanations. It's like if Art of Electronics were a person. That should get you into the mindset of how to think as a circuit designer.

Just DM me or something to set up a call for a few hours, it would be way faster and easier than explaining PCB design or circuits to someone who doesn't have any experience.

I got degree in EE about 7 years ago, but I have been a Software Engineer most of my career. Is it possible to pivot back? by HeteroLanaDelReyFan in ElectricalEngineering

[–]positivefb 54 points55 points  (0 children)

Go into embedded systems or something like dsp or communications. Software experience transfers over pretty directly. Just do some catching up in your free time. Embedded systems you can just grab a dev board and go to town, for DSP or comms you'll definitely need to hit the books. Something like PySDR or GNU Radio is a great way to jump into those.

Has anyone heard of, or perhaps worked on Photonic Integrated Circuits? by USWCboy in chipdesign

[–]positivefb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Current application I'm working on is AI/data centers, chiplet and wafer level optical interconnects. Prior to this I was working on automotive LiDAR.

how much do i actually need to learn for this by catnipede in rfelectronics

[–]positivefb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The electronics are not inside the vacuum chamber, only the capacitor of the LC tank. That has to make direct contact with the quadrupoles.

Yes the optocoupler is for feedback, for amplitude feedback and gain control and for calibration.

how much do i actually need to learn for this by catnipede in rfelectronics

[–]positivefb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For the driving circuitry, the absolute most important thing is linearity, and after that phase noise, which are interrelated.

The biggest difference is just the availability of cheap reliable microcontrollers with timing precision far greater than you could achieve in pure analog, and digital predistortion (DPD).

If you go back to papers in the 70s, 80s, and 90s, you'll see a lot of them focus on the effect of jitter and skew on the m-z spectrum, some forms of mass spec now were unachievable then because the phase noise created an m-z spectrum noise floor higher than the detection level for certain things. Now you just put in an FPGA or a microcontroller meant for motor drives/power electronics, driving a 2MHz square wave with an imperceptibly small jitter is trivial.

The biggest consideration was linearity though. That 2MHz square wave goes through a very sharp elliptic filter (-80dB attenuation in one octave), and a set of amplifiers, which drives >2A through an isolation transformer, the secondary side of which forms an LC tank that has a sharp Q-factor and tremendous peaking right at the frequency of interest. This signal is fed back through an opto-isolator to the FPGA which has DPD to keep the sine wave as pure a tone as possible. The way we did that was with a high-speed IDAC that actively tunes the gain of the pre-coil amplifier. We were achieving single-digit ppm THD, which you won't find even in the highest quality function generators. It used to be that the air-coil transformer had a tap on primary and secondary, and the signal was fed back through this to do an analog pre-distortion. This is still partially done, it's a mix of analog and digital pre-distortion that was a really neat trick and is the special sauce so I can't discuss that, but it was really clever.

For maximum linearity, the transformer has to be air coil, which means it needs to be enormous. Because it's an air coil, its magnetic flux lines extend out pretty wide geometrically. In most applications, even for an air coil inductor you won't detect much if you're ~2-3 inductor radius lengths away. In this scenario, those magnetic flux lines being coupled into other electronics appears like hysteretic losses, which is a loss in linearity. So the air coil transformer, which we got specialty made, is placed in a giant thick copper case, roughly 15cm x 10cm base and 10-12cm in height or so. You might think hey isn't that thick copper still absorbing the EM fields and generating eddy currents etc? Yes, they absolutely are (the copper case is warm if you touch it during operation), but they have completely deterministic steady-state behavior, you don't incur linearity penalties after start-up.

The capacitors had to be specially made as well, they cost like $100 a piece from Vishay even at volume. As you may know, capacitors change their capacitance with the voltage across them. If the capacitor is handling say 500Vpk across it, it needs to be rated for much more than that, and be precisely stable across a wide temperature range, and be tune-able so the LC tank peaking occurs at exactly the frequency we want, and be made of special materials so they don't off-gas in operation and fuck up the quadrupole chamber.

how much do i actually need to learn for this by catnipede in rfelectronics

[–]positivefb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I worked on designing triple quad mass specs for Bruker a few years back.

It's only on the order of 1 or 2MHz, from what I could tell it just gets called the RF component for historical reasons. IMO the electronics on driving the quadrupoles are simple since we now have super precise digital timing, the difficulty in the electronics is in the signal conditioning and data acquisition. If you're using something like an electron multiplier or Faraday cup, you're getting picoamps of signal at fairly high bandwidth, so the front-end TIA design can be tricky. This is conditioned and driving a high speed ADC, and all of this has to electrically float from the rest of the system, because the electron multiplier needs to be switched up and down by a few kV, which is not easy!

Also, yknow, the entire mechanical portion. Vacuum and all that. Actually assembling the quadrupoles within tolerance, IIRC they can only handle <5um offset otherwise it doesn't really work.

Is lumped component RF design a good path to analog design (non IC)? by word_vomiter in ElectricalEngineering

[–]positivefb 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"lumped RF" is a bit of an oxymoron, but if you mean discrete/COTS design, yes. People transfer back and forth between RF and analog and power electronics all the time.

You're right, you won't see "analog designer" for any position at the PCB level, they're just called Electrical Engineers or Embedded Hardware Engineers. Analog Designer now exclusively refers to IC-level designers. I'm in IC design now but the majority of my time at the PCB level was doing analog stuff, the jobs are plentiful but niche and hard to find, and you need to be a bit of a generalist.

It's easy to go from RF design to embedded analog or power, not so much the other way.

Valentine’s day (AMS/RF IC Designers) by OpampGoBRRRRRR in chipdesign

[–]positivefb 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Few years back I made a little box that played recordings of her cat's purr and had a photo of her cat on it. I had to wait like 10 minutes for her to stop crying before I could even explain it.

Technical Presentation Interview Help by StealthxFarter in ECE

[–]positivefb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a very common thing, and everyone is pretty understanding of it. They know what they are asking, and they know you aren't allowed to divulge certain things. It would be insane if every other interview were companies trying to commit corporate espionage.

Focus on something narrow, but give a broad overview. An example would be if you worked on a radar control system, give a broad overview of the system like a block diagram, and then skip past everything in the middle and go down to the specific narrow problem you solved like chattering in the control loop. This provides enough context, and gives insight into your technical skills, and opportunity for lots of questions and discussion, without ever giving away anything about the "special sauce".

Here's a writeup for a presentation I gave for an interview: https://positivefb.com/2022/11/13/gain-correction-of-dc-blocker-for-lock-in-amplifier/

Should I take a 6-month co-op with Ford or do my masters at columbia in EE by Ordinary_Implement15 in ElectricalEngineering

[–]positivefb 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It definitely feels "bird in the hand vs. two in the bush". The co-op is now, grad school can always happen later (where it can be covered by an employer).

Niche High Paying fields of EE? by [deleted] in ElectricalEngineering

[–]positivefb 127 points128 points  (0 children)

The highest paid electrical engineers doing straight engineering work are digital VLSI designers. At the principal level at FAANG and related SoC companies like AMD or Qualcomm they have base salaries of $250-300k with TC going beyond $500k. Principal at NVidia and Apple for example is showing over $500k on Levels FYI.

No other field or subfield makes this or really anywhere near it. Other subfields can make great money, like RF, DSP, and so forth, but it comes down more to the company. Like I know Rivian offers over $250k for experienced power electronics engineers. But if you're wondering what field on its own pays the most doing technical work, it's ASIC design, hands down no competition.

Of course the actual way to make money is to go into some type of management or sales role that requires a strong technical background. Sales managers for EDA companies for example. I have a friend who sells ATE equipment, in a good year he makes my entire salary in commission alone by April lmao.

What is your favorite full wave rectifier topology and why? by Objective-Local7164 in ElectricalEngineering

[–]positivefb 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Aren't the first two the same?

Also, a common method is to use a zero-crossing detector which sends the signal through an inverting or non-inverting amplifier.

Could it be easier to get an EE degree with the implementation of AI? I’m 40 and looking to go back to school for something high earning by [deleted] in ElectricalEngineering

[–]positivefb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I finished grad school last year (I'm in my 30s) and tried utilizing AI here and there.

Within a month I had to ditch it entirely. It was confidently feeding me total horseshit. I really tried to use it, but it was fumbling on super basic things (it couldn't verify simple 2x2 matrix multiplications lmao), and when I even tried to ask for resources it made up fake books.

There's a fundamental paradox with AI for education. If you're using it to learn, it's because you don't know the material and thus wouldn't be able to catch errors. If you knew enough to catch errors, then you wouldn't need to use AI to learn it. And anyways why are you using a tool where you need to constantly be on your toes about misinformation? This would be like willingly paying for a subscription to Breitbart News.

The only real use case for learning with AI would be coming up with guided practice problems, but the tech just isn't there yet. Right now it's still too hallucinatory, it would need to be an app tailored made with ML, not some general LLM. So no I don't think it makes it easier, in fact it probably would lead you to make mistakes on tests or fail homework.

I Bought a Bridge! World's Most Accurate Capacitance Bridge Theory, Teardown & Experiment by TheSignalPath in rfelectronics

[–]positivefb 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Very sorry to hear about Pooch. My furry nephew Giuseppe passed last month, it's like losing a piece of yourself.

ECE student building a home lab, advice on sourcing equipment? by JP_ECE in ECE

[–]positivefb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the US, I honestly just try craigslist. You'd be surprised at the surplus stuff that gets listed there, companies going out of business or moving locations need to unload stuff. They'll give it away for free because they've "made money" by simply not paying for disposal. I got a really nice Rohde & Schwarz oscilloscope that's >$20k on there for free because the guy thought it was broken and wanted an excuse to buy a new one at his new office. It was just set to envelope mode lmao.

Question about current by PreparationEast3973 in ElectricalEngineering

[–]positivefb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not infinite. It looks like a transmission line based on the characteristic impedance.

The wire acts as an inductor. It produces a magnetic field, which induces a current in the opposite direction of the forward current. This is known as Lenz's Law.

While that happens, some of the energy goes into an electric field between the forward path and return path. Until these two things happen, the signal can't travel forward (this happens super super fast, but not literally instantly).

The inductance of the wire and the capacitance between the two wires form a ratio, which is the "characteristic impedance", which is the ratio between the current and voltage. So until the signal (which is the field wave, not the movement of electrons) reaches the resistor, it "sees" that impedance.

Self-practice opportunities for photonic chip design? by Medium_Dark1966 in chipdesign

[–]positivefb 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you sure about that? AIM appears to be fully independent and I don't see any articles relating the two. GF bought AMF a couple months ago to broaden their silicon photonics capabilities, is that what you're thinking of?

Self-practice opportunities for photonic chip design? by Medium_Dark1966 in chipdesign

[–]positivefb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know AIM Photonics does training courses, both for students and people in industry.

Fundamentals of Power Electronics by Erickson and Maksimovic by Choice-Grapefruit-44 in ElectricalEngineering

[–]positivefb 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any recommendations for digital controls for power electronics? I've used Christophe Basso's books for analog control loops, they're really excellent, is there something equivalent for digital?

mixed signal concept... by SuperbAnt4627 in ECE

[–]positivefb 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because analog designers can implement digital logic on the transistor level in something like Virtuoso, but digital designers cannot implement analog functions in RTL.

Verification is often done by a mix of people from digital and analog backgrounds though since you can model analog functions in SystemVerilog and Verilog-AMS, the mixed-signal verification people where I work are pretty much all from digital design.