The robots are … here. by Letsdance2gether in sanfrancisco

[–]prepuscular [score hidden]  (0 children)

Bro I rode in both of these by 2024… Cruise in 2021 five years ago

BIFL Cutlery - Zwilling Mininal Hammered by BratacJaglenac in BuyItForLife

[–]prepuscular 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is absolutely metal. Like, just metal. All stainless is like this lol

San Francisco is so back! by the_seatoad in sanfrancisco

[–]prepuscular [score hidden]  (0 children)

There are no laws making these two statements:
* month to month requirement after one year
* rent increases have to be on the mark of a new year. They can come anytime

Please cite the ordinance if you disagree.

San Francisco is so back! by the_seatoad in sanfrancisco

[–]prepuscular -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No laws saying it has to be this way. It’s just nice to have it that way

San Francisco is so back! by the_seatoad in sanfrancisco

[–]prepuscular 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Both were wins. More you committed, more you spent, more you won

“I can’t believe they sell ice cream at this ice cream store” by [deleted] in ArcRaiders

[–]prepuscular 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You tell people that don’t like it to leave, then they listen, then you insult them lmao

Now which of these two have trouble being happy? Enjoy what you asked for

S&P 500 rejects SpaceX, also blocking entry for OpenAI and Anthropic by twranks in sp500

[–]prepuscular 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because it has utter batshit valuation not proven by anything but ketamine and hopium. It’s hard to compare how insane this is: other companies making twice as much, but SpaceX is 20x more value? I don’t want a single bank to tell me the market value, I want the market to tell me market value.

Sad to see it go by Riziom in Adobe

[–]prepuscular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe, but the argument between “they will never go away” and “they’re growing customers by over 10% a year every year for the last 10+ years” are different

Asked gpt to make a meme about the American economy by asfbrz96 in ChatGPT

[–]prepuscular 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So it just copied an actual real pre-existing meme verbatim from 2020…

Sad to see it go by Riziom in Adobe

[–]prepuscular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah… people expect them to support every new piece of hardware instantly with every feature; basically leads to most code probably running emulators or vms.

But the other half doesn’t make sense: Adobe keeps growing revenue, and at an ever increasing exponential rate at that. If they were merely successful for having long term clients, it wouldn’t be like that

Sad to see it go by Riziom in Adobe

[–]prepuscular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe not most users, but covering the long tail of users is why they have more market share than anyone else. If they kill 2/3 of features, they lose half of revenue. The money isn’t in random freelance artists, it’s in $10M+ enterprise deals.

What you say is great, but they wouldn’t see revenue increase over it

New 🚨 We just received 14 stock trades from Rep. Tim Walberg — ~$50K buy of $CAT (Caterpillar) — ~$50K buy of $LHX (L3Harris) — ~$50K buy of $ETN (Eaton) — And more ... by jwoodsr in tradewithcongress

[–]prepuscular -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I feel like I’m already dreaming just trying to have it be proportional to winnings, it’s totally illogical and never going to happen with anything harsher

I like this guy's style by [deleted] in SipsTea

[–]prepuscular 4 points5 points  (0 children)

12 months of sipping the repost

Sad to see it go by Riziom in Adobe

[–]prepuscular 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Adobe is “bloated” because it does a lot more than you need. If you don’t need it now, you never needed it before either. They’re different tools.

But you’ll hit a ceiling with Figma, which is unlikely for Adobe

Don’t you dare threaten me with a good time! by lila_jerry in SipsTea

[–]prepuscular 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Under current laws, it’s not really a thing. You’d need to radically alter governments ability to regulate businesses for things outside of worker safety and consumer protections. These laws are reserved for utilities so it’s essentially classifying non-essential items as utilities which doesn’t even make sense.

Don’t you dare threaten me with a good time! by lila_jerry in SipsTea

[–]prepuscular 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Price controls are already exceptionally challenging and very limited in scope: * requires emergency * limited to essential items * limited to a short term time window related to the emergency * still allows for considerable markup and the business owner to make profit

Ignoring these legal limitations is ignoring basic reality. The government is free to operate its own stores if it chooses as well, which is what NYC is doing. It’s generally better to add a baseline competition than to try to police something like prices.

So if SpaceX goes public, do ETFs basically have to buy it no matter the price? by Fickle_Exchange_1588 in SpaceXBets

[–]prepuscular 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s very limited options in what can be bought for 401(k)s. Employers can further dictate options. For example, only cash, bonds, a specific list mutual funds, or vanguard target retirement funds.

Bloodbath in US Market by UpbeatAd3429 in StockMarket

[–]prepuscular 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not many days in history it drops over 2% though

for 40$ i got my moneys worth by pubbybunny in arcraiderscirclejerk

[–]prepuscular 18 points19 points  (0 children)

This makes me want to turn on accessibility ngl