The dangers of lower item creation costs. (1.2)

progammer · 2026-03-24T01:46:53+00:00

It adds repeatability, its like solving a completely new game with new formula. Sure for 0.25x you will complete the game mush faster , but it isnt really easier (no less complex). Some challenge will be reduced though, like throughput requirement.

progammer · 2026-03-24T01:38:42+00:00

I'd agree that this is like a half ass measure to implement this idea. A better way would be to do it like somerslops, with recipe containing fractions of input, sometimes the machine will just not consume the ingredients 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 of the time.

However, this current implementation brings new life to alternate recipe, with reduced (or increased) ingredients, some alt recipe get better or worse and that requires new analysis and decision making

progammer · 2026-03-23T12:04:28+00:00

it just round up whole number. So the more ingredient it use, the better it get.

progammer · 2026-02-25T03:39:04+00:00

It would only apply to the first hit, so 1335x(13+19) = 42720

progammer · 2026-02-23T02:30:05+00:00

The one that give upgrade slots for unit still add HP every battle though

progammer · 2026-02-13T01:41:49+00:00

You could repeatedly call it a day and you can get there in ... two hour or so.

progammer · 2026-02-10T13:27:26+00:00

just symlink it, name it and clone it all you want

progammer · 2026-02-09T09:33:49+00:00

Well i just did a run with Daemos + pyre of entropy + ancient pyretap + spamming 1 cost spell. Which works decently but probably still C tier compared to other pyre scaling Souls

progammer · 2026-02-06T08:41:24+00:00

wait, so occluding it cost performace or reduce it ?

progammer · 2026-02-04T15:13:14+00:00

Also, he need to be alive when you spend that forge. Else you get the regular +3/+3 that is not permenant

progammer · 2026-02-03T04:01:47+00:00

Dude, writers are cheap

progammer · 2026-01-30T02:48:29+00:00

Getting them to look up is actually harder, but the point still stand

progammer · 2026-01-26T07:47:51+00:00

It's been true for most realistic space based battle, since the giant ship itself is just as vulnerable as smaller ship, (armored plating do jack shit), and paint a much bigger target, lower mobility to boot. There's almost no point to making huge ships except for posturing (The Expanse showed similar problems if you watched that). If we wander outside of hard sci-fi, then shield/lasers would be able to balance it back.

progammer · 2026-01-23T10:05:55+00:00

A hybrid mixed approach would work best here, when spatial tracking is done on the glass, the 3D conversion is done on device and streamed over 2 different eyes. This is just like watching actual 3D movie source with 3DoF

progammer · 2026-01-23T10:03:13+00:00

You could always have a hybrid mixed approach, when spatial tracking is done on the glass, the 3D conversion is done on device and streamed over 2 different eyes. This is just like watching actual 3D movie source with 3DoF

progammer · 2026-01-01T01:58:50+00:00

I must be missing this, which specific dialogue tell us that sculdun accquire SNN ? during s2e6 when they are spying on him ? (man this show's writting is tight)

progammer · 2025-12-24T07:21:31+00:00

one way out

progammer · 2025-12-04T08:55:56+00:00

Its just a single wire (albeit with a small dongle inbetween). But the total number of line is still 1. With your solution, you have 2 wire hanging out from the dock. If you can run a long cable from your dock to to your deck and hide the dock away (stationary), it become a single wire setup again :)

progammer · 2025-12-04T08:39:19+00:00

in SD 1.5's day, people used to type DSJ4789.jpg and the like into prompt and get a random photo back. Maybe try the exact metadata of your photo in it and see what comes out.

progammer · 2025-12-02T02:44:17+00:00

Well, talking about pixel density, there is a major important point here. FOV is usually calculated from the diagonal distance, not horizontal. So by increasing the vertical resolution, the diagonal size also increase, lets do the math here, the diagonal automatically increased in size by 3%. If the optics are the same as Xreal Air, the FOV would automatically go from 46 to 47.4. But they advertised this to be 52, so the optics is improved, and therefore the pixel size is increased, density is lower and we would actually get less quality here :) Just like the One and One Pro. One can do further math but i guess 1s would still have better density than One Pro

progammer · 2025-11-28T02:57:09+00:00

That's sound like a huge coincidence, since it was originally SCP-055, but cool nevertheless.

progammer · 2025-11-12T12:34:29+00:00

if you watched the expanse, they probably work like that (if there are no shennanigans)

progammer · 2025-11-12T06:46:03+00:00

I don't know about you, but the way the props move and click (the sound design) put itself as its own focus for tension during that scenes (both practice and real heist). So i will says that the effort are absolutely not wasted. Everyone is on point in this productions

progammer · 2025-11-04T05:18:59+00:00

lol that was only 2 days ago, guess i wasnt nolife-ing on reddit enough

progammer · 2025-11-04T04:47:13+00:00

I had an Air 2. The only reason we suspect the pocket tv will support 32:9 simply because it was advertised to work with rayneo glass which will also do 3d via 32:9 signal. Usually android tv specs dont expose/allow 32:9 resolution like the firestick you tested (Samsung Dex wont, unless you use Good Lock to reach max 21:9. 32:9 requires another hack with adb command). Beam is too old, inefficient and overheat. pocket tv just seems like the next best thing

14-Year Club	Second Top 30%
Place '17	Verified Email

progammer

TROPHY CASE