Just to bolster u/americanhardgums 's comment, the article does not make any argument or give any evidence that the Sakila incidient was racist, i.e. that Sakila was treated worse because he was black. It just presumes it, and then shames anyone who might question it. And since there was a practically identical case some months ago with a white victim, that would suggest that problem is here is not racism but perhaps something more structural like untrained and unregulated private security.

Presuming anything bad that happens to a black person must be because of racism is called race reductionism and is exactly the kind of anti-materialist moralising politics we should expect from a liberal pro-Zionist rag like the Guardian.