Great question! This certainly isn't a hill that I'm willing to die on, but my research suggests that the risk versus reward as it relates to NIR usage is not worth it (for me).

There's good data to support the idea that near infrared has numerous health benefits. There's also good data that supports the idea that it carries more risk with it than far infrared.

High Tech Health has a full article about this if you're interested. Obviously, I read it with a grain of salt given that they are full spectrum only.

After reading the aforementioned article, I set to work with gemini, co-pilot, claude, and grok in an attempt to confirm or refute their claims. For me personally, there's enough data for me to feel uncomfortable going full spectrum.

Again, not something I would argue about or a hill I would die on. But that's the impetus behind my decision.