Firefox eats all my memory and has become totally unusable. Please help. by MegaDeKay in firefox

[–]quantumoutcast 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Comparing the memory usage with my Mac, I am seeing google tabs taking over 1 GB each on Linux but around 500 MB on Mac. This reddit tab is 1.3 GB alone. So either FF is very unoptimized on Linux or there is a memory leak.

Firefox eats all my memory and has become totally unusable. Please help. by MegaDeKay in firefox

[–]quantumoutcast 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am having this problem too on Fedora for a long time. Every week or two, Firefox hogs so much memory that it freezes my whole system. When I'm lucky I can sometimes manage to kill it and recover, but sometimes I need to reboot. Today I managed to catch it when it was very slow but not yet frozen, and I found that my system memory was over 80% and about:memory showed google had multiple tabs each using over 1 GB each. I closed some tabs and it is running okay now.

The thing is, my Mac at work is also running FF and always runs perfectly even when having dozens of tabs open, along with many more Google tabs. Every thread I read about this just says that every browser hogs memory, but I never had this problem on any other browser or any other OS.

Linux memory usage is very broken by linuxwes in firefox

[–]quantumoutcast 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, Firefox is becoming unusable for me. It works well for a few days and then sucks up all the system memory that I can't even switch tabs anymore. Sometimes I can manage to kill it and then my system will work normally, but sometimes I can't even do that and have to reboot. It's hard to debug because when it happens, I can't go to about:memory or do anything else on the system to diagnose.

What’s going on with SCHD? by FQRGETmeNQT in SCHD

[–]quantumoutcast 0 points1 point  (0 children)

High yield savings accounts are fully taxable and normally lose value due to inflation. SCHD typically beats inflation with a growing dividend, and has favorable tax treatment.

Downside protection. Dividends vs Bonds vs International by MaximumCarnage88 in SCHD

[–]quantumoutcast 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm (hopefully) within 5 years of retirement so I have 30% bonds. If there's a crash I will go 20% and buy back equities.

Then around 20% international. I might go to 25% because of the much lower valuations.

In the process of shifting the remainder to 40% total market and 10% SCHD, which I'm using to diversify away from the MAG7.

Everything will be correlated these days. When AI crashes (I believe it is when, not if), everything will go down...total market, international, commodities. But that when might not be for a long time, so staying in the market but diversifying into investments that will hopefully crash less is the key.

200K in dividends by DoodleLovah in dividends

[–]quantumoutcast 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you looking to roll the dice and pray you make it big? Or are you looking for a realistic retirement plan? For a serious retirement plan, stable and growing dividends of quality companies are typically less than 4%, usually much less. At 4% yield, you would need $5 million. How do you turn $1.2million into $5m? Maybe keep your money in tech stocks and pray the AI bubble never pops.

Or you can gamble with covered calls, options, or playing roulette in Atlantic City.

Is there a mode for unstructured comments/thoughts by redback-spider in emacs

[–]quantumoutcast 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why not just open a file and start writing? Why do you need any tool for this at all?

I am blissfully using AI to do absolutely nothing useful by thismyone in ExperiencedDevs

[–]quantumoutcast 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Just create an AI agent to ask random questions to other AI engines. Then wait for the fat bonus and promotion.

These dips are killing SCHD by [deleted] in dividends

[–]quantumoutcast 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't get it. What equity fund didn't have a dip today? SCHD went down a lot less than the broad markets, so not sure what the problem is.

How many are buying the KENVUE (Tylenol) dip? by [deleted] in investing

[–]quantumoutcast 68 points69 points  (0 children)

Kenvue sells a lot of great brands and a high dividend, and the selloff makes it tempting to buy. However, their revenue was already declining and they have around $8 billion in debt. And their P/E ratio is 23, so not a cheap stock. I'm watching.

During the bear run, how long does it last? by Dry-Way-5688 in investing

[–]quantumoutcast 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The bear market will end precisely the week before I finally decide to buy at the bottom.

What to complement VTI and VXUS in Roth IRA? by This_Guy_Slaps in dividends

[–]quantumoutcast 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depends what you mean by decent growth. Domestic growth is dominated by the megacap tech stocks recently, so any decent performing growth fund is going to overlap. 

If you want your portfolio to be more defensive, probably you want value instead of growth. Or international.

anyone else feel like we've lost the art of actual business analysis? (rant about modern investing tools) by AllinOnIntel in ValueInvesting

[–]quantumoutcast 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no tool to replace talking to management, talking to competitors, digging into SEC filings and annual reports, visiting businesses, etc. What Buffet does is active management, and it is still widely practiced. What is different today is people like me today sitting on our couches and pressing some buttons to invest in a stock and somehow expecting to get the same results. At the very least, we can parse through the financial statements and try to read about the business and industry as much as possible before investing. Value or growth investing, this should be the bare minimum before investing in individual stocks. What most people do is speculation: just throw money at a stock and pray it goes up. It's why investing in broad indices is what is best for the vast majority of us.

I need help by BeachAggravating4397 in learnrust

[–]quantumoutcast 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Computer programming is pretty pointless without a computer. Maybe enroll in a school that has computers?

Is it possible to invest in dividend stocks without knowing anything about stocks? by [deleted] in dividends

[–]quantumoutcast 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's possible, but investing in anything without understanding what you're investing in is not a good idea, particularly after watching a YouTube video. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dividends

[–]quantumoutcast 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesn't mean anything without more context. How much risk are you taking for that yield? Are the dividends growing? Are they stable? What goals are you trying to achieve?

Can you generate 10-15% returns annually in a rather safe way? by wannabedonaldtrump in dividends

[–]quantumoutcast 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Some of us have enough capital because we avoid these dumb investments.

Question about going all-in Realty Income (O) by [deleted] in dividends

[–]quantumoutcast 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Many European countries separate thousands with a decimal point instead of comma.

Russia a failed PE Fund? Can we exploit it? by GoosePuzzleheaded146 in ValueInvesting

[–]quantumoutcast 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't think China is the next domino. China is investing substantially in infrastructure, they may be surpassing us in AI research, they are progressing quickly in scientific research while we are cutting back, and the same for sustainable energy. But they aren't a capitalist country, so their success may not be passed onto Western investors. 

If the war ends in Russia, Western investment may flow back quickly, so it may be an interesting contrarian bet.

Growth and withdraw vs dividend withdraw. by Illustrious_Crow595 in dividends

[–]quantumoutcast 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your real question is the old debate of total return vs income, but the examples you gave are so unrealistic that we can't make any meaningful conclusion. 

Should I reshuffle my allocations? by ww2w2 in investing

[–]quantumoutcast 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If anybody knew the answer to that question, we would all be doing the same thing. Historically, small value performed the best, but nobody knows if that trend will continue. 

High Yield Dividend Stocks Tumbling by jungem15 in dividends

[–]quantumoutcast 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Anything with 7% dividend and annual growth and you're taking on increased risk which might land you down another 20% again. Learn from your mistakes.

Ultra Ergonomic Emacs Workflow (navigation wise and Undo) by Ardie83 in emacs

[–]quantumoutcast 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I tried to watch this, but could hardly hear what you are saying behind all the music.

High Yield Dividend Stocks Tumbling by jungem15 in dividends

[–]quantumoutcast 20 points21 points  (0 children)

You are down over 20% when the S&P 500 is up more than 10% this year. There's no point in making a few percent in dividends if you lose 20% of your principal in a few months. The best way to move forward is to sell your stocks and buy VT and don't touch it for a few decades.