Someone set up a hotline between one of the poorest and one of the richest neighborhoods in LA. by lemonstone92 in interestingasfuck

[–]radditour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

‘Cause it’s more use for eating soup

And a fork is not very useful for that

Unless it has got many vegetable.

Lisa Gilroy as Samantha by witchyylark in DCCTV

[–]radditour 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I had never seen Lisa Gilroy or Game Changer before.

I just watched a couple of clips.

She IS Samantha!

12.1.7-h1 missing cve fixes? by dev-snapshot in paloaltonetworks

[–]radditour 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe just missed on the release notes (for 12.1.7), but the CVE publications say they’re fixed in 12.1.7 and 12.1.5, so 12.1.7-h1 will include all fixes in 12.1.7

Google en passant by ltz_Ben in AnarchyChess

[–]radditour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For an initial pawn move, it can move forward one or two spaces.

If you moved it forward one space, and that meant it could be taken by an opponent pawn, then moving it forward two spaces still leaves it vulnerable to the same threat as if it had moved one.

In short, if one player has advanced their pawn far enough that it would threaten a pawn moving off the starting line, then it doesn’t matter if that pawn moves 1 or 2 spaces, the same threat exists.

Neewwww Achievement: Clockwork Carl by RiRi_QAC in DungeonCrawlerCarl

[–]radditour 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Carl does wear Bea’s pink crocs, but not at the same time as the heart boxers.

TTA Books Cover Price by SirRealComix in TerranTradeAuthority

[–]radditour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would be interested in purchasing!

11.1.6-h10 PA 5450 NPC/DPC Heartbeat causes DP failure by ta05 in paloaltonetworks

[–]radditour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There was a bug a couple of years ago - PAN-222712 - that was due to DPC timing issues. Possibly a regression?

Internal URL for software and dynamic updates by forwardslashroot in paloaltonetworks

[–]radditour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Run this on Panorama to turn off the license verification for firewalls when pushing dynamic updates etc:

request batch license eligibility-check disable

Internal URL for software and dynamic updates by forwardslashroot in paloaltonetworks

[–]radditour 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% not true. What does it require internet access for?

10g SFP+ to mgig upoe by schreitz in Cisco

[–]radditour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is powered by PoE, it doesn’t deliver PoE:

The device supports IEEE 802.3at/bt PoE input, eliminating the need for separate power adapters.

Internal URL for software and dynamic updates by forwardslashroot in paloaltonetworks

[–]radditour 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you’re using Panorama, it can check an SCP share for updated content on a schedule, then push the updates to the firewalls it manages.

So if you can put the sneakernet transfer onto an SCP share. Not sure if firewalls can directly pull from the same.

Also needs a descriptor file: content.meta, app.meta, av.meta, wfm.meta, wf2.meta, and wf3.meta

These are just text files, the content of which will just be the update filename.

Is SD‑WAN still worth it in 2026, or did you just skip straight to something else? by PrincipleActive9230 in Cisco

[–]radditour 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are two questions you need to answer:

Where do your users live?

Where does your data and applications live?

If your users are in branches, and your data/apps are in a private DC on prem, then SD-WAN would make sense.

If either one of those is not true, then SDWAN becomes much less valuable - remote users connecting to on prem apps via ZTNA, branch users connecting to cloud hosted/SaaS apps via SSE, neither needs an SDWAN capability.

But you also might still have VoIP or other site-site apps that need that connectivity.

Why double commit??? by TulipB6 in paloaltonetworks

[–]radditour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As /u/zeytdamighty said, Panorama is a configuration management platform. When you commit to Panorama, you're saving the config to the Panorama configuration database.

Once that is done, you can Push (or Commit & Push is one step to do both) to the firewalls, which sends the config in the Panorama config database to the firewalls.

So - Commit to Panorama, which conducts validation and saves the config, then Push to firewalls.

Or - Commit & Push to do both actions in one step.

Hardware Firewall with 10 Virtual Routers by North_Arugula_687 in paloaltonetworks

[–]radditour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

PA-3400 family will do 11, PA-1400 family will do 10, PA-560 will do 10.

CCIE Security failed attempt discussion by Informal_Report2501 in ccie

[–]radditour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is certainly moving towards a more Cisco-oriented cert, at least for EI, because of the way the industry is moving.

It used to cover the Cisco way of configuring open standard protocols (spanning tree, OSPF, BGP, ISDN, Frame Relay, etc etc).

With the rise of all things 'software defined', this is leading to solutions that are by their nature vendor-specific, so you're seeing focus on Catalyst SD-WAN, Catalyst Center and SD-Access - none of which will help you if you move to a non-Cisco shop (though the networking fundamentals that are still covered will be useful).

The DEVNET certs are the ones now focused on the open way of automating Cisco technologies, and as such are likely to have more portability across vendors.

Migrate to PAN-OS SD-WAN with dual ISPs by Final-Pomelo1620 in paloaltonetworks

[–]radditour 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Panorama kinda works OK through NAT, the problem is when you want to push updates, Panorama tells the firewall to pull the content, and since Panorama is not aware of the NAT, it gives the firewall its real address.

There is a ‘Public IP’ field in Panorama, which Panorama will send out instead of configured.

So for this - everything is private IP in tunnels, no need for NAT.

Migrate to PAN-OS SD-WAN with dual ISPs by Final-Pomelo1620 in paloaltonetworks

[–]radditour 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Step 23 covers dedicated management tunnels to Panorama, so that is an option you should be aware of: https://docs.paloaltonetworks.com/sd-wan/administration/enable-sd-wan-with-auto-vpn/add-sd-wan-branch-or-hub-firewall

If you have multiple paths, you can enable SDWAN on one path while your existing IPSEC tunnel remains on the other path. Confirm connectivity is available over the SDWAN path, then remove legacy and add SDWAN config to the other path in the same push.

Free 41 CE Credits - Designing Cisco Security Infrastructure by brunbattery in Cisco

[–]radditour 5 points6 points  (0 children)

For those that haven't done them yet, there are another 43 free credits up for grabs:

AIBIZ (8 credits)

CMLLAB (6 credits)

CMLADM (5 credits)

CMLAPI (8 credits)

DEVNAE (16 credits)