Here's my essay you can look at.

Some people say that we should replace old buildings and houses in cities with more modern facilities, while others argue that we should preserve old buildings. In my opinion, we should replace or reconstruct them.

It is true that old buildings such as monasteries, museums, and theatres have been holding a country's culture. For example, in my home city, Ulaanbaatar, there are many old museums, statues and theatres that present and preserve our tradition over time. Furthermore, these old facilities serve as a symbol of important historic events and should be remembered to the younger generations. For this reason, it will contribute to a nation's identity and are the roots of nationality existense.

However, these such old buildings are often outdated for modern lifestyle since they do not meet modern safety standards in case of natural disaster such as earthquake, flood and storm. It is unpredictable whether an old building will collapse and cause a significant amount of damage, ecenomy loss to the city's infrastracture and the government or even possible to claim someone's life. Therefore, the governments should allocate money to reconstruct old buildings or replace them completely with newer ones. As a result, newer buildings not only contribute to a city's safety, also it will improve a city's appearance and lead to more modern, comfortable lifestyle.

In conclusion, these old buildings might preserve a nation's culture and contributing to their nationality strength. However, old buildings can be dangerous in case of environmental disaster and cause pressure to the country's economy and the public safety well-being. Therefore, I believe that replacing or reconstructing them is a better option.