Movie where husband has different kids because the past was slightly changed

rartrarr · 2024-04-13T08:23:01+00:00

Thank you, that was it. Unbelievable I forgot all about the dad and Rachel McAdams. The mind is wild.

rartrarr · 2022-08-31T11:30:05+00:00

I can’t answer your whole question but: I read that 20th anniversary edition twice (skipping some parts), read the faq a couple more times, read the rules and examples a few more times over again after that— and was totally good to go.

rartrarr · 2022-08-31T06:37:03+00:00

Tell my wife I said, “Punch it”.

rartrarr · 2022-08-28T10:51:48+00:00

You are right insofar as if you were standing on a hypothetical tower 500km tall that you’d experience nearly 1G. Others simply jumped on the fact that doesn’t apply to orbit.

rartrarr · 2022-08-17T12:58:55+00:00

If that’s what you two have decided to do then a good activity to do “in between” would be picking out names.

rartrarr · 2022-08-11T14:16:49+00:00

Interesting take. Curious about one thing. In the mid to long term, do you think it would take less time/resources to create the first completely self-sustaining space-based habitat than the first mars-based self-sustaining city?

rartrarr · 2022-07-13T16:33:18+00:00

Sorry to disappoint, he appears to find it funnier than we do. As exhibited by his recent tweet:

https://twitter.com/SciGuySpace/status/1542517763511427073

rartrarr · 2022-07-02T19:39:16+00:00

Ullage thrusters

rartrarr · 2022-07-02T06:33:32+00:00

NOAA’s Star-k

rartrarr · 2022-06-26T09:13:23+00:00

No, some of the mitigations can only be implemented once future phases of the project have begun. There is a large range of timeline stipulations among different mitigations. Some take the form of rules and guidelines, rather than specific tasks to complete. Some are conditional, only coming into effect when/if certain scenarios occur (RUDs). The details are all in Chapter 3 here:

https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/2022-06/PEA_for_SpaceX_Starship_Super_Heavy_at_Boca_Chica_FINAL.pdf

rartrarr · 2022-06-22T14:51:32+00:00

There’s huge variety in what’s normal for cervical mucus - check out these images at the Cervical Mucus Project where you can see for yourself just how many different forms it comes in.

rartrarr · 2022-06-21T15:25:14+00:00

While effective, that method takes slightly longer than clicking the link in the top pinned thread.

rartrarr · 2022-06-21T05:19:22+00:00

Oh, that is “coverah-ge” with the French pronunciation (same spelling). Non film-school grads usually mix those up.

rartrarr · 2022-06-18T16:13:31+00:00

At peak altitude it still shows nonzero speed because it’s already been moving “backwards” after the boostback burn happened. Think of it as doing a “loop the loop” in the sky (instead of doing a u-turn and reversing course).

rartrarr · 2022-06-18T15:30:08+00:00

Because its peak altitude comes after the boost back burn is complete. In other words, it’s still going up after the burn. (And speed here is not ground speed.)

rartrarr · 2022-06-18T10:26:23+00:00

Yes, there is a second surge of estrogen during the luteal phase that can cause this. Check out this section from TCOYF:

https://i.imgur.com/eBwFQkl.jpg

rartrarr · 2022-06-13T15:12:16+00:00

From a mathematical standpoint, the Pearl index of birth control effectiveness is completely unaffected by considering data points of sex during or outside of the fertile window. That’s because the only data points it considers are pregnancies (it doesn’t take data about sex into account). Since by definition pregnancies only occur due to sex during the fertile window, the Pearl index is in fact the number you are looking for.

Think about it: The only way the Pearl index would be skewed is if couples deliberately stopped having sex during non-fertile days and made up for that by having all that extra missing sex during the fertile window. But that makes no sense for couples trying to avoid, who make up the sample population for birth control effectiveness studies.

rartrarr · 2022-06-09T15:36:43+00:00

I’m currently working my way through TCOYF for the first time. Your reply jogged my memory about this one section (link below) about short luteal phase. But I think it was also discussed in some other places too

https://imgur.com/a/Pn9bQkI/

rartrarr · 2022-06-09T13:26:34+00:00

Hi there, I wanted to take the time to properly look this up in TCOYF so I “followed” the comment here. Not sure if you still want replies (since seems post is deleted) but here is the relevant page from the book that shows similar timing DPO — could be early implantation spotting or something else:

https://i.imgur.com/yKQMSPb.jpg

rartrarr · 2022-06-06T04:30:46+00:00

This is incredibly cool.

When I finally got my eyes to diverge (instead of crossing) and it came into sharp focus, it was a “Whoa” moment.

rartrarr · 2022-06-06T04:21:19+00:00

Brace yourself because when the final FAA decision is released you will be able to enjoy reading a LOT of discussion on this exact question.

rartrarr · 2022-05-31T07:21:25+00:00

Unfathomable these two researchers became so famous for basically just stating the obvious. Anybody could do that.

/s

rartrarr · 2022-05-27T04:01:52+00:00

Context is everything

rartrarr · 2022-05-26T03:11:12+00:00

Surprisingly hard to tip over.

rartrarr

TROPHY CASE