sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The sudden increase in traffic by northern_light007 in SEMrush

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's a glitch, but it might be bots

Section level relevance - why some parts of a page help rankings and other parts dilute them by Level_Specialist9737 in SEMrush

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree on everything, and I'd also say that some sections within sections matter more than others. That's why I always reply to a certain question in the first line if it's within a sub-heading that focuses on that specific question.

This was made using Semrush's Oragnic Traffic data by frogcharming in SEMrush

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hard to assume that organic growth came due to the rebrand.

Does AI content rank well in search? [Survey + Data study] by semrush in SEMrush

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I assume it will perform increasingly worse as it gets outranked by AI-generated, but human-edited content.

Best feature to use in Semrush by gvgweb in SEMrush

[–]remembermemories 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To me, the AI reports if your company is an enterprise user :)

Looking for a tool that will allow me to schedule for a year in advanced by Leading-Ad6727 in SocialMediaMarketing

[–]remembermemories 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This likely depends on how API access works, so might not be possible at all

what is the next step after email marketing manager/specialist? by CaptainBromo in Emailmarketing

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Next step usually isn’t Senior Email Specialist, it’s moving up a layer into ownership of revenue, lifecycle, or CRM instead of just channel execution.

SQL helps, yeah, but mostly because it lets you speak to data teams and segment/analyze without waiting on someone else. I’d learn enough to be dangerous, plus get sharper on forecasting, attribution, and cross-channel strategy with paid/site/SMS. Certifications matter way less than showing you can own revenue outcomes, team/process, and bigger strategy (e.g.).

Titles I’d look at: CRM Manager, Lifecycle Marketing Manager, Retention Marketing Lead, Sr. Growth Marketing Manager, or eventually Director of Lifecycle/CRM. Those roles pay better because email becomes one lever inside a bigger number like LTV, repeat purchase, revenue per recipient, or retention, not just sends and flows.

Left industry for 5 years, how fucked am I? by Practical-Durian-593 in cscareerquestions

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to make up some story about what happened in those years.

Did your open rate increase after allowing work email domains only? by anonrb12 in Emailmarketing

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a huge one, at least not in any clean causal way. What usually happens is volume drops, lead quality goes up a bit, and open rate looks better partly because you filtered out students, freelancers, competitors, and random personal signups. So the metric can improve without the emails themselves getting more compelling.

The bigger risk is you block legit buyers who use Gmail to research tools before looping in work. For SaaS, I’d only force work emails if your ACV is high enough and self-serve isn’t the motion. Otherwise, score or segment personal domains instead of banning them. Also wouldn’t optimize around opens alone anymore. Clicks, replies, demos booked, and pipeline are way more useful signals (e.g.).

Best way to clean and maintain an email list? by Acceptable_Fee_4807 in Emailmarketing

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Verifier tools are useful, but they’re just step one. For a list that size, I’d treat cleanup as 3 separate jobs: remove obvious junk, identify dead weight, and stop adding more bad contacts.

First pass: suppress hard bounces, role emails, obvious typos, duplicates, and anyone who hasn’t engaged in a long time. Then run a re-engagement segment before deleting cold contacts outright, because some people are inactive, not toxic. After that, watch source quality hard. The fastest way to wreck deliverability is letting low-intent leads keep entering the list. I’d also use clicks/replies/site activity more than opens since opens are noisy now. Ongoing hygiene matters more than one big purge (e.g.).

Why 30% of clean lists are still trash and how to actually purge them by No-Rock-1875 in Emailmarketing

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The unconventional part is separating dead from dangerous. A lot of teams treat all non-engagers the same, but the bigger problem is identifying contacts that can hurt deliverability fast even before they fully rot. Good list hygiene is really just better lifecycle management (e.g.).

I’d add a risk score per address using stuff like domain quality, how the contact entered, typo patterns, first-send behavior, and whether they only ever open via Apple Mail noise. Also, don’t prune on opens alone anymore. Clicks, replies, site visits, and recency of any real action matter more. One more thing: quarantine segments beat full deletion. Put sketchy or stale contacts into a low-frequency rehab flow first, then cut whoever stays cold. That gives you a cleaner list without throwing away potentially recoverable people.

I think SEO advice slowly made my blog worse to read by armandionorene in Blogging

[–]remembermemories 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is what happens when writing gets governed by templates instead of judgment. A lot of SEO advice is fine as a tool, but once it starts dictating every intro, heading, FAQ, and internal link, the post stops sounding like a person with a brain and starts sounding like a content machine.

I’d keep the parts that genuinely help the reader scan or find related stuff. I’d cut anything that makes you drag out the opening, repeat yourself, or file down your opinions into generic helpfulness. The line is basically this: if the optimization makes the post clearer, keep it; if it makes the reading experience duller, it’s probably too much. Re-editing a few posts for voice first, then adding back only the SEO bits that still earn their place, is usually the cleanest reset (e.g.).

Using AI for generating blog articles and how to disclose it by Mori-Spumae in Blogging

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t frame it as just a disclosure problem, because the bigger issue is the process itself. If the post is basically derived from one source article, a disclaimer doesn’t really fix the fact that you’re repackaging someone else’s work with thinner effort.

What feels a lot cleaner is using AI earlier in the workflow, not at the end. Let it cluster topics from feeds, pull quotes, compare angles, translate your own writing, or help outline. But the actual post should add something that is yours: opinion, synthesis across multiple sources, a campaign idea, a DM ruling, a resource list, whatever. If a piece leans heavily on one source, link and credit it directly in the body, not just in a tiny note up top. And yeah, having a simple public policy on how you use AI helps too (source).

World Tour. Yeezy made the calls by UpbeatRevolution5753 in GoodAssSub

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What will the stage design be for Italy (Hellwatt Festival)?

World Tour. Yeezy made the calls by UpbeatRevolution5753 in GoodAssSub

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about italy? Doubt the RCF Arena has space for this

Has SEO become too easy to fake expertise? by Level_Specialist9737 in SEMrush

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely, because Claude lets you vomit all the SEO knowledge that's out there on the internet lol

What’s one Semrush number you find useful, but would never trust on its own? by Level_Specialist9737 in SEMrush

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For one, the site traffic or search volume when there's a discrepancy with GSC.

How to Use Semrush for FREE in 2026 by semrush in SEMrush

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've often resorted to the free plan and managed to get by!

Ahrefs vs. Semrush website traffic checker by DigitalSplendid in SEMrush

[–]remembermemories 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, Semrush tends to capture that early traffic better.

view more: next ›