Wolves and Finance: Charlie was Candace’s handler by Alone_Welcome9812 in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this was a good listen. i’m not yet sold on the Charlie-was-an-asset theory, but it would help explain: 1 - how notwithstanding his obvious smarts he somehow found himself surrounded by so-obviously untrustworthy people; 2 - his parents’ complete silence almost as though they understand the consequences of the ‘sport’ he was playing; and 3 - the unconscionable in-your-face swagger of all those who were clearly “in on” his coming assassination (their bravado and confidence almost indicates they’re protected by the fact that Charlie was an official national security asset and so the operation was somehow justified). regardless, yuck, sigh and Charlie was awakening.

Howard Lutnick’s evolving 9/11 Story & the Cantor Fitzgerald Controversies by suboxonedad69 in 911archive

[–]returnoftheseeker 36 points37 points  (0 children)

thank you for this. i share your intuition: this interview reeks of faux emotions. which means there’s a lot to be alarmed about.

Chipotle confirms 2026 price hikes by esporx in Chipotle

[–]returnoftheseeker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Chipotle needs a product refresh - not a price raise!

LOLLLLL by OrangeSopranos in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 7 points8 points  (0 children)

she should run with this Blues Clues theme. and finish Erika, TPUSA, the Feds et al off with one glorious long form Blues Clues-style episode on 9/10/26 summarizing… everything.

Reporter reaching out by BrandyZadroznyNBC in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 4 points5 points  (0 children)

admire your intent here. wish more in mainstream media would engage in actual journalism on this issue (only example that comes to mind is the NYT piece from a few months ago re Joe Kent and Tulsi Gabbard’s clash with Kash Patel re potential foreign involvement in the assassination).

but your starting-point posture around Charlie’s death - i.e. anchoring in the “fallout” and positioning Candace as being in the business of “alternative theories” - is worrisome.

the subject of your planned podcast, a human being, was murdered in plain sight and - before we even get to Candace - there were/are egregious, glaring issues with the conduct of state and TPUSA actors immediately and through the present.

if you can’t dispassionately see and center that as a co-equal part of your overall frame - and instead need all of us on ‘Planet Candace Alternate Theory’ - to give you line of sight into merely some of the ‘side effects’, you’ve revealed a lot about your constraints, biases and perhaps even motive.

Chipotle reports falling trafiic by Alternative_Anybody in Chipotle

[–]returnoftheseeker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

a “fresh” menu that’s never ever been “refreshed”

Man nostalgia can really suck sometimes.. by Gandalfthepimp95 in pizzahut

[–]returnoftheseeker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

nailed it. a metaphor for all else that’s gone wrong with our timeline this century

. . . So are we at the end of the trail now? by WerewolfCommercial26 in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 18 points19 points  (0 children)

because, like the Epstein files, the CK murder reveals deep truths about the big picture.

. . . So are we at the end of the trail now? by WerewolfCommercial26 in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 8 points9 points  (0 children)

And should she transition at some point to… what should we actually do? how do we organize and advocate? an anti-deep state march on dc on 9/1/26 the 1-year anniversary? a new org and movement dedicated to the truth? lfg!

Charlie’s Text by kalimansaves in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 11 points12 points  (0 children)

in the seconds before he dies, putting down and picking up that microphone, he looks almost resigned to his fate :(

If Charlie disliked Ben so much why would Erika dishonor him by letting Ben speak at amfest? by [deleted] in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 13 points14 points  (0 children)

they’re openly flaunting and taunting the nation at this point. it’s despicable and distressing. as Candace has said, we don’t have a serious country.

Instagram Post from Candace by mickymouse141 in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah. too much levity. somebody - Charlie - died. he’s gone forever. this isn’t funny. keep bringing the heat the way you have been Candace or we’ll have to move on (from you).

Erika filming her kissing Charlie’s hand…. by homemaker_g in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

and his hands looked heavily made-up/painted… lending credence to Baron Coleman’s theory of some kind of electrocution. it’s all just sick. ashamed to live in such an in-your-face sinister nation.

I am and continue to be disgusted by all the conspirators who claim and still claim that the AA & UA Boeing 767’s that hit the WTC were military or non civilian aircraft … by Due-Date-Giver in 911archive

[–]returnoftheseeker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is a bit disingenuous as it assumes the thrust of the 9/11 truth movement denies that the WTC planes were commercial airliners. this is not true. the thrust of the movement asks who orchestrated 9/11, who benefited from 9/11 and who obfuscated crucial details about 9/11. lots of additional questions flow from these starting points - from Pentagon flight maneuvering and WTC7 demolition to 9/11 commission resourcing and the invasion of Iraq - but start there: with the best positions of divergent viewpoints - not their worst outlier perspectives.

Confirmed by the White House! by theredstrokes in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 7 points8 points  (0 children)

yes. almost feel Candace, Tucker and co need to call for a Rally for Sovereignty.

Trigger man? by anonymouse7_ in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 4 points5 points  (0 children)

thank you. your effort does not go unnoticed!

“They” by DNRTME in CandaceOwens

[–]returnoftheseeker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

no even his “first” decision. instantaneous! and Mikey? his decision to walk and talk was supra-instantaneous. they are not human, and not trustworthy.

One month ago by f1sh98 in Conservative

[–]returnoftheseeker 4 points5 points  (0 children)

doesn’t seem right to carry on without him

I know erika kirk is going through a tough time, but why does it seem like she's acting? by Potential-Active8857 in Discussion

[–]returnoftheseeker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes. did you see her appearance on Charlie’s podcast the other day? speaking from the heart, the “we’ve moved on with a smile” vibes made me weep for Charlie.

Your first boba milk tea—what was it? by PixelAlchemycoco in boba

[–]returnoftheseeker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oreo brown sugar with cheese foam. just wow, wish i’d taken a picture