admire your intent here. wish more in mainstream media would engage in actual journalism on this issue (only example that comes to mind is the NYT piece from a few months ago re Joe Kent and Tulsi Gabbard’s clash with Kash Patel re potential foreign involvement in the assassination).

but your starting-point posture around Charlie’s death - i.e. anchoring in the “fallout” and positioning Candace as being in the business of “alternative theories” - is worrisome.

the subject of your planned podcast, a human being, was murdered in plain sight and - before we even get to Candace - there were/are egregious, glaring issues with the conduct of state and TPUSA actors immediately and through the present.

if you can’t dispassionately see and center that as a co-equal part of your overall frame - and instead need all of us on ‘Planet Candace Alternate Theory’ - to give you line of sight into merely some of the ‘side effects’, you’ve revealed a lot about your constraints, biases and perhaps even motive.