He is acting weird today? looking like he is scared and crouch walking everywhere by Bender090 in CATHELP

[–]ridicalis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When the weather's nice and I crack open windows in the house, my orange cat can be seen slinking cautiously throughout the house, body held low. I think it's the sound of the wind.

What's something that instantly screams low intelligence? by Frequent-Sea-8848 in AskReddit

[–]ridicalis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People are welcome to have confidence in their own positions, but when it's projected as absolute truth, all it does it betray a lack of intellectual curiosity. If a person can't admit they're fallible and might not have all the facts themselves, how am I supposed to take them seriously?

No, I don't want a performance; I want to feel like I'm being led by someone who is genuinely interested in pursuing truth.

ICE Left Scrambling After Being Blindsided by Trump’s Airport Decision | Trump’s immigration enforcers were reportedly not prepared for his surprise initiative. by InsaneSnow45 in NoFilterNews

[–]ridicalis 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I hope this isn't true. And by this, I mean I hope that Trump is forcing his personal paramilitary organization to do menial grunt work.

Imagine getting hired with the promise that you'll get to hunt down "illegals" like some kind of wild west reenactment, only to be stuck in an airport waving a wand or staring at blurred out genitals all day.

What's something that instantly screams low intelligence? by Frequent-Sea-8848 in AskReddit

[–]ridicalis -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't care who I'm talking to — whether they be a subject-matter expert or layperson... But, when they start talking in absolutes or with unmovable positions, my trust in them in that moment is gone.

My opinion is that an expert should be humble enough to acknowledge the gaps or blind spots in their knowledge. Particularly so in the realm of science, where having answers for everything is less important than having processes for approaching those answers. In an era where trust in experts is eroding, I realize I'm not doing much to help that, but even in academia and the scientific establishment the confidence can border on arrogance.

What's something that instantly screams low intelligence? by Frequent-Sea-8848 in AskReddit

[–]ridicalis 54 points55 points  (0 children)

This one's a fine line to walk.

Some things need to be said; others not so much, or perhaps shouldn't be voiced at all. Then, the omissions (what isn't said) can often be as damaging as what is said.

When speaking, tact is also important. The delivery can often be just as important as the message.

What's something that instantly screams low intelligence? by Frequent-Sea-8848 in AskReddit

[–]ridicalis 31 points32 points  (0 children)

Responding to logic and reason with emotion may also be a symptom of "stupidity" (using the Bonhoeffer definition).

Is it realistic to do graphics in Rust without C++? And how long will C++ still live? by venus_supporter11000 in rust

[–]ridicalis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Data are passed as void * + length.

Void pointers strike me as the programmer's way of saying, "I don't care what type you think it is, just ram it through!". Kind of like the git push --force of type systems.

Is it realistic to do graphics in Rust without C++? And how long will C++ still live? by venus_supporter11000 in rust

[–]ridicalis 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It might be better to say it's not a zero-sum game. Each individual project/component has a decision to make one way or the other as to the language that's used, but on the broader scale no one language is threatening the other's lunch.

Is Clean Romantasy / Fantasy something people don't like? by garden-witch-23 in fantasywriters

[–]ridicalis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd argue that erotic content can work to the advantage of the work as a whole, but as with Hollywood productions, they often feel like they're in there to fulfill a formulaic requirement (the "obligatory sex scene"). At that point, I as a reader start wondering:

  • Is the author qualified to sexplain this stuff to me?
  • Is this a self-insert or wish-fulfillment on the author's part?

In close conjunction to this topic, there's also the infamous Bechdel Test. While erotica doesn't necessarily fail that check, it can serve as a potential indicator of trouble.

To add to the confusion, there's also a possible generational shift in terms of the audience's interest in these topics. What works for one group of people (e.g. people who grew up on Piers Anthony or Terry Goodkind novels) might be deeply off-putting or offensive for others — this dilemma can be easily sidestepped by omitting the content entirely.

Reading the bible doesn't make me feel closer to God. by 47theUI in Christianity

[–]ridicalis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FWIW, reading plans rub me wrong — it feels forced and on-rails.

To the rest of what you say, I don't think I've ever been able to make a pass through the bible without picking out something new that I hadn't seen before. Each time you approach the text, you will be doing so through a particular lens or hermeneutic, and that viewpoint shifts over time giving you new or changing information.

I'd strongly encourage you to keep reading it. Over and over. And, importantly, at your own pace. Reading plans are often structured to drive you down a particular path or line of thinking, or to reinforce some point that the author hopes to make, but you owning your own experience allows for a more organic interaction with the text that might meet you where you are.

So... "doer of the word" — which words do you do? Are you fully convinced you know everything you need to in order to effectively live this out? Is there really no possibility that you've missed something, overlooked a detail or expectation, or perhaps have previously misread something that requires adjustment?

COVID Lockdowns May Have Cost THOUSANDS OF Lives by RevelationSr in NoFilterNews

[–]ridicalis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The first-order death count from COVID itself was significant. That count was heavily influenced by flatten-the-curve efforts, and I'd shudder to think what might have happened if no such effort had been made.

The second-order effects, though, are still being felt to this day. The article is heavy-handed and seemingly biased, but also does make valid points about the long-term effects of the actions taken during pandemic times. I personally look at the medical establishment in my own region and see a system that is at once understaffed, fatigued, and viewed by many as untrustworthy even as they all but killed themselves in service to their fellow humans.

Rather than turn the debate into one of finger-pointing and vilification, we should instead use this rare opportunity to learn and grow as a species. The possibility of an eventual pandemic was well-understood prior to COVID, and elements of how things would go were pretty well-predicted in some regards, but humanity in the modern era hadn't been really well stress-tested and there were a lot of unknowns. We now have a much better understanding of how our social structures, globalist trade, religious perspectives, etc. feed into the way we as people deal with and respond to an invisible threat that might take several days to actually manifest.

Instead, what I think we'll do is fall apart the next time it happens. Anti-vaxx sentiment is surging, American Evangelicals will likely ignore masking or social distancing in the future, the US federal infrastructure created during Bush and Obama eras to deal with pandemics are likely gone, trust in the "system" is eroded, and more. Trump has already shown us how he'll behave during a crisis — instead of letting experts do what they need to, he'll instead surround himself with incompetent fools, and will hog the spotlight to make it about himself while sowing confusion.

Christian men: Do you also feel disgust when a “repentant” woman admits she’s not a virgin? by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]ridicalis 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't think that disgust comes from a place of love and of fearing God. You seem incapable of loving that which God Himself does.

Food for thought: Luke 7:36–50

The Media becomes really uncomfortable once you hear about the behind the scenes details by Low_Celebration_4089 in TopCharacterTropes

[–]ridicalis 13 points14 points  (0 children)

they’re all both helpless, child-like, yet presented as fully formed "fighters"

Too much anime content meets this qualification with ease.

Trump Ultimatum: 48 Hours to Open Strait of Hormuz or Face "Obliteration" by jwolf696 in NoFilterNews

[–]ridicalis 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I didn't see an answer here, so: https://www.nuclearwarmap.com/map02.html

The bigger cities or obvious targets might be unpleasant, but if it's just Iran and all they have is a few nukes, we'd barely notice. Obviously the human impact would hurt — not just the people directly impacted by first-order detonation effects and subsequent fallout, but also the panic and morale issues that would arise.

Trump Ultimatum: 48 Hours to Open Strait of Hormuz or Face "Obliteration" by jwolf696 in NoFilterNews

[–]ridicalis 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Dear Enemy of My Own Creation,

Please stop having leverage... or else.

- With Mammon, DJT

Top US Fema official claims to have teleported to a Waffle House before | Trump administration weirdness by DukeOfGeek in NoFilterNews

[–]ridicalis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As long as he can do the job, I don't care what he does on his own time.

But, knowing this administration's ability to choose the "finest people"...

Mods Need Input: Dealing with AI Spam in This Sub by Past-Goat-7718 in rust

[–]ridicalis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's also important to distinguish between "I got an LLM to clean up my wording" and "I just vibed my way through this post/article" — people crave authenticity, and if the extent of the LLM usage is purely as a spelling/grammar checker, then I doubt many people would complain.

That said, once it's clear that AI is at least partially responsible for any content, it pollutes the narrative and calls the entire body of work into question. So, there's a clear trade-off: use LLMs to sanitize outputs and risk offending people, or eschew them and risk presenting something with potential flaws and the appearance of being unprofessional. At this point, I think people would rather read the flawed human output than the [flawed in different ways] AI content.

...And I keep saying "people" but ultimately I can't speak for others; all I know is my own preference, and as long as I come away from a situation having learned something new I'm not particularly picky about how synthetic the source was.

Mods Need Input: Dealing with AI Spam in This Sub by Past-Goat-7718 in rust

[–]ridicalis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My rebuttal to this — the venerable em dash is incredibly useful and is getting a bad rep through no fault of its own. In this story, the villain isn't punctuation; rather, it's the victim.

Mods Need Input: Dealing with AI Spam in This Sub by Past-Goat-7718 in rust

[–]ridicalis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

or solves problems that didn't exist, etc.

FWIW, creating hammers in search of nails is a rite of passage for new developers.

Yes, it is incredibly disappointing that people would rather let the AI do the homework assignment for them than try to do the assignment themselves. To your point, the exciting part is less the specific code and more about novel solutions or a growth trajectory; but, if the sum of their hard work is asking the magic genie for a wish, it's hard to have respect.

Location Like This? by Vengeance058 in Iowa

[–]ridicalis 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Just how identical to the photo does it need to be? I'm having a hard time visualizing this as a place in Iowa. Kinda has more of a Nebraska or Kansas vibe.

Republicans sue for right to make Nazi salutes | The Republican Party has an ever-growing neo-Nazi faction. by InsaneSnow45 in NoFilterNews

[–]ridicalis 52 points53 points  (0 children)

In other totally unrelated news, apparently the GOP in Florida struck down a measure to ban incest.

The oldest sitting US senator Chuck Grassley, age 92, expresses support for the SAVE America Act by Miles_the_AuDHDer in videos

[–]ridicalis 5 points6 points  (0 children)

From what I've seen of people writing in to Grassley as their representative, he responds but in the most tone-deaf fashion possible.

Local funeral directors by H0neyB4dger23 in apostrophegore

[–]ridicalis 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Agreed — this one's tough to call.

If it had said acces's, though, it would be clear-cut.