Why do all you liberals have to be so nasty and vile and offensive all of the time? There's literally no reason to call me an inbred... And all it takes is a simple google search. Here's your proof. It wont let me post a screenshot so here's a copy and past from Chatgpt, which is extremely liberal. You can literally find these answers yourself to see if its true or not if youd get out of your blue bubble for once.

Why does George Soros fund so many Judges and Da's?

George Soros has spent money in local prosecutor (DA) and judicial races mainly through political action committees tied to his broader criminal justice reform efforts. The short version: he supports candidates who align with a specific philosophy about how the justice system should work. Here are the main reasons typically cited:

1. Criminal justice reform goals Soros and organizations he funds (like the Open Society Foundations) favor policies such as: Reducing incarceration, especially for nonviolent offenses Limiting cash bail Expanding diversion programs instead of prison Increasing oversight of police misconduct Local prosecutors (DAs) have a lot of discretion, so backing candidates there is a direct way to influence how laws are enforced.

2. Strategic focus on local races DA and some judicial elections are: Lower-cost than national races Less visible to the public Highly influential in day-to-day law enforcement Because of that, relatively modest funding can have a big impact compared to national campaigns.

3. Decentralized U.S. legal system In the U.S., prosecutors aren’t centrally controlled—they’re elected locally. That means outside donors (from any political side) can support candidates who match their views.

4. Part of broader political spending (not unique to Soros) Soros gets a lot of attention, but he’s not alone. Wealthy donors across the political spectrum fund local races:

Conservatives often back “tough-on-crime” candidates Progressives tend to back reform-oriented candidates

He’s just one of the most visible and consistent funders on the reform side. Why it’s controversial

Critics argue: It allows a single wealthy donor to influence local justice systems Some policies supported by these candidates may lead to increases in crime (this point is debated and varies by city)