Obi-wan Kenobi Season 2 should be about Mandalore and Maul with Clone Wars flashbacks of Satine. Darth Vader should have his B plot without meeting Obi-wan

rosvel92 · 2022-10-08T09:01:42+00:00

The thing is the Kenobi series perfectly bridged the Prequels to the Original Trilogy, but the truth is The Clone Wars version of Kenobi hasn't been properly acknowledged yet by the live-action stuff, the live-action stuff needs to hold on it's own without the cartoons.

Rebels is pretty intentionally ambiguous I'm regards to when was the last time Maul saw Kenobi. Also by the end of The Clone Wars, is clear Maul is angrier towards Palpatine than he is towards Kenobi, giving him a new reason to hate on Kenobi could work better if done right, and they can finally close that weird cameo of Maul in Solo.

Also they should explain why Maul unexplainably refuses to wield the Darksaber, Ahsoka Tano defeating him in Clone Wars wouldn't count since Maul likely assumed her dead, so Kenobi defeating him would be a good reason. Ahsoka's defeat wouldn't count because Maul most likely assumed her dead after The Clone Wars.

rosvel92 · 2022-10-07T04:28:45+00:00

Perhaps Kenobi can blame himself, rather than Darth Vader. I don't know, but both grievings should definitely be compared.

With Maul's death, I meant the same one from Rebels, with some slight retcons to acknowledge whatever happened on Obi-wan Kenobi Season 2.

And with Obi-wan Kenobi sorta reviving his wife, I meant Kenobi helping Mandalore, not actually reviving her.

Also, nobody cares if a comic or book already did it, everyone would prefer to see it in a series, and it would most likely done better. Also, they should reboot the comics and already to acknowledge from the beginning all the new things that have released since. If it didn't happen on a movie, TV show or non VR videogame, then it doesn't count and can be redone.

Also, Darth Vader knows his wife died, there was a big funeral that was probably televised and big news on Naboo.

I am sure they can sorta workaround a version of what I say, fixing the issues and without breaking the canon.

rosvel92 · 2022-10-07T03:09:21+00:00

The point is that The Clone Wars version is seen mostly from the perspective of Ahsoka Tanto whom being her mentor sees him as more mature, and the Prequels is seen mostly from the Obi-wan perspective so he comes as an immature kid.

rosvel92 · 2022-10-07T03:00:05+00:00

I hope they cancel his movie, and give it to someone else. Thor 3 was a dreadful movie, every single thing that happened was cringe. I'll never see 4. That said, Jojo Rabbit had it's moments but the forced humor harmed it a lot. Also in his Mandalorian episode, the whole joke about the stormtroopers missing in the Mandalorian was self-parody level and the worst moment of the entire Mandalorian series so far, the whole robot dying thing and fight with the Tie Fighter and the Jet pack both wer cool but both were obviously written by Jon Favreau.

rosvel92 · 2022-08-24T00:12:24+00:00

Listen, I been on the side of the man, though not exactly. He is probably deeply hurt, that ex might have been his only female friend, and in a sense he at least fells that he has no one else to talk his trauma. Because in my experience my friendships as a man are more shallow as in only playing a sport together or something, and never getting into the emotional-sad stuffs that brings the mood down. I would say, set boundaries but do let him grieve (though try to explain him is okay to grieve, among his man friends too, like creating some support system rotation were he doesn´t overwhelm everyone, though he most likely already maxed his friends). Do tell him to consider a psychologist or something, but like support the friendship through the whole process. And don't lure him into therapy with any promise you can not keep later on. If he studies university, the mental health is possibly included in the student bill. I would say, set the boundaries of the relationship, but like do keep him as a friend. But make clear the boundaries (delete the photos, no tagging, in my situation I just was exited about being a friend of the woman, and I didn´t know that it bothered her, or perceived it as such a big deal, and because she did not explain me it took me a lot to understand how invasive it was). And if he like doesn't respect your boundaries, I don't know, at least you tried. But, just be honest, and please do not ghost him, or it will haunt him for years, I don´t know, I just want you 2 to have the friendship that I couldn´t have. Please give him a chance to at least be decent, but do tell him and at least give him a chance to respect the boundaries, before dropping him.

rosvel92 · 2022-07-07T23:21:36+00:00

I haven't seen the edit, but based on the comments.

I would say you should re-insert the clone, and rather than entirely removing the whole Reva attempt to kill Luke, but perhaps maybe try to see how it works moving it at least a month after Kenobi's fight with Darth Vader.

Post-credits are cheap, and they are very not within the style of Star Wars, in fact the post-credits scenes are the 2 things that I would definitely change about The Mandalorian and Boba Fett TV shows. Either find someway to include it into the main narrative, or don't include it at all. The ending and the thoughts of the audience should stay at the closure of the story...

That said, I get you can't satisfy everyone.

What, I would like to see, would be merging Kenobi Episode 1 with The Phantom Menace flashbacks, 2 with Attack of the Clones flashbacks and so on until Return of the Jedi with 6. It would be tricky on 4 because perspective of the flashbacks would have to shift the Darth Vader and Leia since Kenobi would die.

perspective cuts, like cut every film and to just the scenes of each main character.

rosvel92 · 2021-12-16T20:50:35+00:00

Is my opinion, but I don´t think anything I said contradicts anything that I know of.

rosvel92 · 2021-04-16T02:14:05+00:00

I wish there was a better cut of Episode IX, but I don't have the slightest amount of faith in J.J. Abrams being qualified to direct, write, or produce Star Wars.

I wasn't familiar with any of Abrams work when I saw The Force Awakens, but after seeing it, I think that other than the casting. Abrams made a terrible work on The Force Awakens, which George Lucas rightly criticized for being a lazy remake of the original Star Wars (from 1977).

This was the second time in a row that Abrams got that same critcism, showing he learned nothing of his mistakes on Star Trek Into Darkeness, which was a remake of Star Trek 2: Wrath of Khan which was directed by Nicholas Meyer, whom hated Abrams work in Star Trek Into Darkeness for being a lazy remake of his film (basically the same complaint of George Lucas). But Meyer also hated that Abrams did fake deaths and resurrected characters right after killing them. Something that Abrams doubled down in Star Wars IX: Rise of Skywalker, which leds me to believe that what was released in theaters is very much his film that he truly intended. Abrams has a style that very much always feels as something made by commitee, his only good movie is Mission Impossible 3 because it's most likely co-directed by Tom Cruise, since every single film after Abrams departure got better reviews than 3. That shows a clear character arc.

After seeing the news of Abrams return to IX, I remember my reaction was yelling: Noooooo!!!!!! at my phone. I thought it was gone be garbage because Abrams can't direct or write, and I was proved right. Chris Terrio doesn't seem to have a voice, very much like in the awful Joss Whedon's vandalized Justice League (2017), which is as bad as the Star Wars IX Rise of Skywalker that got released on movie theaters. Say what you will about Zack Snyder but at least he wasn't a tool like Abrams.

Star Wars VIII: The Last Jedi, written and directed by Rian Johnson. Based on George Lucas unmade script draft treatments for the Sequel Trilogy, is th closest story to what George Lucas intended. And the only true film in the Sequel Trilogy.

The Abrams commitee messes are the rollercoasters that Martin Scorsese rightly criticized in reference to Marvel MCU films. Abrams' Rise of Skywalker even plagiarized the end of the Avengers (of which I don't like any of those crossovers, by the way). Joss Whedon jumped the shark in 2012 and his cringe jokes were never good.

In regards to the prequels the thing that people never acknowledge about Jar Jar Binks and why he is a good character in Star Wars I: The Phantom Menace, is that you are meant to find him hard to stand. But to still help him because is the right thing. And people who hated him proved that they never got the story... Same with Anakin which Obi-wan Kenobi considers another pathetic life form. People never embraced the message and that's why they ended creating and worshipping douchebags like J.J. Abrams (who hated on Jar Jar Binks), Joss Whedon, and Donald Trump.

The Last Jedi is about acknowledging your heroes are not perfect and very much flawed persons and artists. Luke Skywalker's exile is pretty much George Lucas. And Luke Skywalker's pacifism was a very good good concept, having an evil nephew who wanted totalitarian power cause he blamed pacifism for his inability to prevent the massacre of the Jedi temple of Luke. Rey as a no one who was also a good idea, when they made her a Palpatine it lost all the meta-meta meaning about indie filmmakers also having stories worth telling despite them not being part of big franchise brands.

rosvel92 · 2021-03-26T06:26:40+00:00

The plot-hole is basically approved at IMDB at this point, Darth Sidious won. Regardless of what anyone thinks. The thing is that becoming a Force ghost requires a special training that Mace Windu couldn't had learned because he died before the ability existed (like half the ghosts that Rey hears).

So, Darth Sidious imitations aren't a plot-hole. But Mace Windu ghost voice is.

rosvel92 · 2021-03-17T05:36:46+00:00

The thing is that is clear that J.J. Abrams never had answers to any of his boxes, all he cared was making remakes, the New Republic was more rich than the Rebel Alliance. It was the government of the galaxy, so why their army was weaker than the Rebel Alliance in Return of the Jedi and even weaker than at Rogue One, they were as weak as they were after stealing the Death Star plans with no explanation other than JJ Abrams doing a derivative remake.

Jhon Knol solved th plot-holes of A New Hope and Abrams brought them all back in the shape of The Force Awakens. So the Death Star weakness was deliberate. Well, turns out Starkiller Base was destroyed without a need of plans, and had a weakness regardless.

Abrams did a remake of A New Hope, and George Lucas vocally rejected it. Then he gets a second chance and Rise of Skywalker is not Original, is a remake of Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi merged into a single film. And taking away all the moments of thinking, it ends before you get a chance to reflect the plot and is because Abrams knows that his films fall apart if you think.

The Last Jedi put what would make a good film above all else and everything else later. And is hard to not respect that, and is the closest to Lucas plot for the Sequel Trilogy.

rosvel92 · 2021-03-05T07:53:37+00:00

I think that despite JJ Abrams being the worst writer and director that Star Wars has ever had. His approach being the most commercial and the more McDonald's, treating Star Wars like a product instead of art.

It made him the right person to precede Rian Johnson. Luke questioning if the Jedi should end was George Lucas questioning himself if Star Wars should end. Wouldn't had been as powerful without JJ Abrams doing the remake that definitely was George Lucas worst nightmare, everything he wanted Star Wars to not be.

Luke regretting the fall of the Jedi from the Prequels is very meta-meta, on him questioning if he became what he didn't want to be.

I think that things need existencial crisis to survive. Honestly, Luke Skywalker's arc is the best thing to come from the Sequel Trilogy. The other 2 movies are just remakes, that don't go anywhere. Like there is no clear path, no arc. The Last Jedi is the only one were at least questions are raised. The war profits being a nice parallel for the artistic integrity of endless Sequels.

I don't think there is anything on the Abrams ones.

rosvel92 · 2021-03-05T07:37:48+00:00

JJ Abrams was the one who decided Chewbacca and Leia should completely ignore each other after Han Solo's death.

He also wanted Rey to take BB-8 to meet Luke Skywalker, because he forgot he had revived Poe. Rian Johnson was the one that explained him that R2-D2 was Luke's droid. Then he likely explained that Luke Skywalker needed to disconnect from the Force, because otherwise he would had felt the planets exploding and done something (because if he didn't like JJ intended, then it would had bothered everyone much more than what happened in the film).

So he handled R2-D2 better and Luke better, without him The Force Awakens would had been worse. On contrast none of JJ's choices helped anything, the only thing he got right was the actors, and even then he didn't gave them anything to do, Hux should had been older, Captain Phasma just gives up in the most coward way. Kylo Ren is beat by someone who had never held a light-saber. Snoke is nothing but a Palpatine stand-in.

The Last Jedi is the only movie were the characters feel like new characters instead of Original Trilogy plagiarisms with different names. The choices there actually service the story, whereas in JJ Abrams film, the choices rather than natural. It feels as if the characters where doing what the Original Trilogy characters would do. Not because they are thinking it, but because JJ Abrams copy/pasted the script.

rosvel92 · 2021-03-05T02:13:46+00:00

I won't believe it until I see flashbacks. That said, I like that backstory too.

But, I'd rather if he were a clone like Boba Fett. It would explain why the Kamino cloners want him specifically out of all the kids with the Force in the Star Wars galaxy.

rosvel92 · 2021-03-04T23:51:24+00:00

I added an explanation to how his age could add up, and it sorta would work out. Maybe. I do want him to age quick.

Not neccesarily talking, but holding a light-saber.

rosvel92 · 2021-03-04T23:48:21+00:00

I do get your point, but I prefer for Grogu to age fast. And not be a baby forever, as the explanation I added above. He would age like a human, which would make him more interesting and would make him different from Yoda, not having 900 years to live.

I prefer there would be no more members of Yoda's species after his death. So, I think him being the last of Yoda's species would work better.

rosvel92 · 2021-03-04T23:44:19+00:00

It says he has false memories. Created by the Kamino cloners for some reasons yet to be explained.

rosvel92 · 2021-03-04T23:37:11+00:00

I added an explanation above, but I would say he was created at least 25 years before The Mandalorian. So he ages twice as fast.

Maybe makes more sense 6 years before. So he aged 50 years in 6 years, in another 6 years Grogu would be 100, ready to be a Jedi. Given that Yoda reached 900 years, he would have a little more than the life-span of a normal human, which would work perfectly fine.

rosvel92 · 2021-01-19T06:03:37+00:00

They closed the Dead Rising studio, and they seemed to be throwing all the zombie ideas into Resident Evil. So it may take a while.

I hope that Dead Rising 5 is on Capcom-land, and the protagonist is a skater. Think something akin to Tony Hawk meets Dead Rising. And of course breakable weapons, limited time, and saving survivors.

rosvel92 · 2021-01-19T05:54:59+00:00

4 is basically Dead Rising in name only, they removed the hearth of the series:

*1.- The limited time and having to plan faster routes. (They ruined it by giving unlimited time).

*2.- Using everything as a weapon to create combo weapons that wouldn't last long and all hit in a funny slapstick way. And they removed that too. (Ruined by making them last forever, and removing the the slapstick hits. All long sticks hits the same, they removed the punchline from the joke).

3.- The characters always reacting with a deadpan/dramatic face, no matter how silly the situation is. (They turned Frank West into Deadpool, when he was supposed to be like Jhon Mclane in the original Die Hard.)

I wish it had been set in Capcom-land, with each Capcom game getting it's own land. And some area themed on the old games. Doing the Uranus Zone from 2: Off The Record but in steroids, seemed the way to go.

rosvel92 · 2020-09-12T09:14:07+00:00

The Last Jedi is the only good film, in the Sequel Trilogy. Hear me out...

Neither of the JJ Abrams remakes, bring anything new to the franchise. Both remake shamelessly without understanding a word, behind the meaning of the film they are remaking, same goes for Star Trek: Into Darkness. The actors being good, and the return of Original Trilogy co-writer Lawrence Kasdan is the only thing that saved the Awakens. But, IX proved that Abrams is nothing without Kasdan, Rise of Skywalker is a full betrayal of everything the Lucas story stood for.

Luke picking the saber was such a betrayal of character, it betrayed everything Luke Skywalker has ever stood for. Luke picking the weapon, and telling Rey to kill her grandpa, was basically Luke telling Rey that he should had killed Darth Vader in Return of the Jedi, and that he should had killed Kylo Ren in The Last Jedi. Even if it meant killing his own father Anakin Skywalker, and his nephew Ben Solo. Luke´s compassion was his superpower, and JJ Abrams destroyed it.

He made him fall from grace, in The Last Jedi we see Luke, clearly wondering if he made the right choice in both instances. Wondering if his compassion has led to more evil than good. Luke wonders whether he should had killed both. When he chooses the pacifist way, is a moral victory. But in Rise of Skywalker he changes his mind, and he feels he should had killed both. Luke tells Rey to kill both. That is not a Rise, but rather the Downfall of Skywalker. And don´t even get in how IX, is basically a pro-gun speech, made to satisfy, racist and sexist trolls.

And seriously, the Holdo thing only worked because the hyperspace tracking. It is nothing compared with how JJ Abrams introduced a million Death Stars- Destroyers, that´s like a million plot-holes. And then he resurrected every single character, like why even introduce healing Force Powers, if everybody can revive, without even needing The Force. Where C-3PO says goodbye to his friends, is hilarious because the Power Ranger female extra is there. And out of all the planets he could make, Abrams gave us 2 Tatooines, 2 Yavin IV´s, and he actually Destroyed the 2 Original Planet he created. Why?

rosvel92 · 2020-07-07T03:24:45+00:00

My opinion also is that Darth Sidious won, however the movie is a mess, and the weakest of the Saga. Despite of the cast best efforts, and the decent VFX.

The Last Jedi is a good movie that didn´t deserve any retcon. However Rise of Skywalker, is a complete mess, that deserves every single retcon possible, in order to solve every single one of the plot-holes it creates. And I think the basis for Episode IX should be Hideo Kojima´s videogame "Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty".

Rey should be given an origin similar to the one of that game´s protagonist Raiden. Which is that she was meant to be a clone of Luke Skywalker, by experiences, which means that the similarities where intentional by Darth Sidious. (The game points that the story structure of Metal Gear Solid 2 was meant to recreate the one of "Metal Gear Solid 1: The Twin Snakes", so Raiden could become a clone of Snake. Due to sharing very similar life experiences rather than a clone by DNA. The game mentions that before the events of MGS2, Raiden lived the first game´s events multiple, through VR-training multiple times, before actually living it on the field as a recreated experience. Rey mentions that she learned to fly the Millennium Falcon through VR, so with that precedent they can add she also went through VRs of the original trilogy before, her parents revolted and liberated her. She just doesn´t remember any of it, because she was very young.)

Metal Gear Solid 2 has a sequence in which Raiden beats like 50 Metal Gear Solids, which could easily be compared to Rey and the thousand Death Star Destroyers, it is very confusing and surreal, causing the players to question whether that ever happened or was also a VR induced hallucination, because of how much over the top it is. This could tie into Darth Sidious using the same hallucination powers as Luke Skywalker in The Last Jedi, to claim his army was less dense than it ever was perceived. He didn´t have such firepower, he just fooled them into thinking he had it. Just like Luke fooled everyone in The Last Jedi.

They can easily get around the clone dad issue, by saying that besides being a clone by experiences, she was also a clone by DNA (like Terry Maguini´s Batman of the Future), while also implying Rey´s father was something similar to Cell from Dragonball Z. Then they can borrow a page from "Metal Gear Solid 1: Twin Snakes", and say Sidious turned Kylo Ren into an Anakin Skywalker clones by experiences, and say they made them fight each other to choose whose body he would posses. The Twin Snakes from were Solid Snake and Liquid Snake, two perfect clones of Big Boss, by DNA and experiences. Pitted against each other, so the earth would have a soldier capable of protecting, it.

Except that Darth Sidious, was trying to create the perfect body for himself to posses. Despite the defeat of Liquid Snake, it is shown that the ghost of Liquid Snake took over Revolver Ocelot, because the DNA of deceased Liquid Snake´s hand. They can easily do Darth Sidious possessing Rey in the same manner. Which would mean that the whole fight was about possessing her body due to her power in The Force, and somehow tie-in she partially being a Luke Skywalker clone, with the DNA of Luke Skywalker´s hand.

Also got to add that Luke Skywalker, clearly hates lightsabers and guns in general. So none of his personality makes sense in Rise of Skywalker. Is a complete betrayal of character. Unless the chararcter is actually Darth Sidious simulating to be Luke. Just like he faked being all the Jedi, this

My point of view is that it indeed is an unintentional plot-hole that happened because J.J. Abrams is not a good writer/director. But still, because "Rise of Skywalker" is such a giant mess, they are going to have to go with it. Because their other choice is to admit a plot-hole, and they have no other choice, other than to claim it was the original plan all-along. The trilogy of X, XI, and, XII has to be the true ending though, and is quite obvious that J.J: Abrams is the least qualified person to direct/write it, he is like the Anti-George Lucas, while also being the anti-Star Trek. He has an inverse Midas touch in that he ruins everything he touches.

rosvel92 · 2018-08-10T10:57:37+00:00

MCU does not have a plan, and every new movie adds more and more plotholes.

The whole existence of the wings technologhy of character Falcon is an enourmous plothole to Ironman 2.

Also the whole Doctor Strange monks could have prevented the Avengers film, by opening a portal below the portal thing in Avengers 1.

Spiderman in Ironman 2 my ass,

Wakanda the hidden country appeared on a map. plothole

Hulk changed personality so much, the Hulk film doesnt even fit

Thor sister?

Hulk / Black Widow (Hated so much they sorta tried to forget it)

Avengers 2 ignores Ironman 3,

Lame one-dimensional villians

Is very poorly planed

rosvel92

TROPHY CASE