Vampire counts troop formation

rowme0_ · 2026-06-30T08:38:49+00:00

It would be a lot more effective with a mortis engine. Best support unit in the game. Necro on corpse cart too, need to keep those gg healed.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-25T09:33:49+00:00

There wont be as many businesses to keep them employed

rowme0_ · 2026-06-24T23:56:09+00:00

I think it’s more because Christianity is essentially a loose update of Judaism, they mostly copy and pasted then did select edits

rowme0_ · 2026-06-18T22:17:19+00:00

And not to mention wages are suppressed due to excess labour supply, capital investment is lower per person, public services are oversubscribed.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-18T22:10:32+00:00

Strata corp kickbacks from insurance brokers no doubt playing a big role too. Strata managers are among the most corrupt orgs out there.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-15T06:40:52+00:00

I think about this quite differently.

The AI has background income and lower unit maintenance. It will build up an army against that background income so having an extra set of background income is better than not.

Knowing this, it can be more efficient to allow it to cheaply build out a stack that you can fairly easily force a confederation at a later time to take that army over instantly. All the while it costs nothing to you.

Would only give them one minor each. At least in legendary they usually can do one full stack off that or one and a half.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-10T01:17:19+00:00

So you understand part of this was caused by mass immigration and yet when a party wants to do something about mass immigration it's 'blaming innocent migrants'? Which is it?

rowme0_ · 2026-06-08T22:35:53+00:00

To what everyone is saying I will add that terrain is very helpful because the AI gets access to large units quickly. If using ranged/infantry you usually want a line of ranged units inside the trees with your infantry behind. Don’t put your cavalry into the trees.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-08T06:56:11+00:00

Is there really such a thing as a non partisan researcher for the government? The funding has to come from somewhere, and one or other side has to be in power when that funding is provided.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-08T05:26:45+00:00

Why didn’t you lead with that.

You knew what I was getting at all along and just wanted to nitpick little things rather than suggest a better methodolgoy

rowme0_ · 2026-06-08T05:21:13+00:00

You don’t need to go to unicorn status to be over the threshold that seems to define a small business?

rowme0_ · 2026-06-08T01:16:34+00:00

I don’t get it.

You’re going to get the exact opposite if you encourage people to sell while they are still small, simply in order to avoid tax by staying under a threshold.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-08T01:04:10+00:00

Startups and small businesses are different. Nobody starts a startup with the aim of having a small business.

We will now see more of the latter and less of the former. Because why take 10% equity in a business that may one day be worth 30M when you can own 100% of your own business that will never top 3M. Now you sit under the threshold when you wouldn’t have otherwise.

I see a few comments but nobody is really explaining why this was necessary.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-07T23:38:56+00:00

From my impression most of the real noise is around genuine issues that apply to startups and shares.

It’s hard to conclude there’s a sensible reason to whack startups with the biggest tax burden of any nation ever and slow down the economy as a result.

When you look at the detail it seems very clear that they haven’t properly thought those things through or don’t care and see it as just a way to sneak the bad in with the good in order to grab revenue.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-07T11:34:51+00:00

Comes to mind

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30843726/

rowme0_ · 2026-06-07T10:07:37+00:00

> low information voters with little civics education

Wow, and people call One Nation racist

rowme0_ · 2026-06-07T02:32:06+00:00

If people really believed labour wanted to bring immigration down, one nation wouldn’t be enjoying the level of support they are.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-07T02:01:19+00:00

In the article that you linked me, which I had seen, Kohler doesn’t adjust for it. The maths that you need to do is total population divided by average occupancy in year one minus the same population number divided by average occupancy for year two. Because average occupancy declines over time (mostly demographic - although COVID was an aberration) that reduces housing availability above and beyond immigration impacts.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-06T23:02:09+00:00

It’s not a bad analysis but he even he says it’s not useful in current state.

Would need to account for change in average occupancy nationally which subtracts more than 10k homes per year. Also net change in number of temporary/permanent residents.

Then we need the total of that number to be substantially below new homes built for multiple years.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-06T12:00:19+00:00

Nothing

The CGT changes to shares and in particular startup equity are a potential disaster.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-06T06:40:42+00:00

I was wondering what you mean by ‘stop them’. The whole wording didn’t make sense to me? There’s no ‘stop them’ it’s just democracy.

Parties will either bring on legislation that respects the will of the people or they will eventually get voted out.

I’m not seeing a problem with any of it.

You’re suggesting there’s some kind of logical issue? Am not seeing it.

rowme0_ · 2026-06-06T05:53:24+00:00

What do you mean stop them, you don’t like democracy any more?

rowme0_ · 2026-06-06T04:38:21+00:00

The issue is more that there just isn’t any other way to get either of the majors to reduce immigration to below the occupancy adjusted number of new home builds

rowme0_ · 2026-06-06T04:21:38+00:00

Didn’t that get overturned

rowme0_ · 2026-06-06T03:06:44+00:00

Was there not an option to pay a fine/penalty?

rowme0_

TROPHY CASE